The Slovene Development of Meanings in Deverbal Nouns,with Particular Reference to the Verbal Noun
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/SLS.1.1.06Keywords:
SVN, Slovene language, Word-formation, deverbativesAbstract
The verbal noun with the word-formational meaning of Action (De) as an ordinary substantival derivative from a verb by suffixation was classifed as early as A. Bohorič, who used the term glagolje. Acertain stagnation and deviation from progress toward a theory of word-formation is the treatment of substantival derivatives based on gender by M. Pohlin and O. Gutsman. Nevertheless, the fact that gender as a distributional criterion of a complex word is such a recurrent feature also demonstrates the importance of the syntactic base with expressed gender -- so the syntactic base represents an intermediate grammatical transformational phase between a complex word and its semantic base.
The true beginning of Slovene word-formation is represented by V.Vodnik with the description of word-formational meanings of substantival derivatives from verbs. Further developments in word-formation are observed in Dajnko's and Metelko's grammars. F. Metelko had taken J. Dobrovsky as a model, and P. Dajnko introduced the term Ableitung for ordinary derivation by suffixation.
A normative view of the treatment of the verbal noun is represented by F. Levstik with the terms glagolšček or glagolsko ime, which may substitute for the infinitive.
Slovene word-formation was recognized as an independent linguistic field by F. Miklošič. His theory of word-formation revealed the relationship meaning : form. A comprehensive inventory of suffixal formants represents all word-formational meanings, including the possible metonymic meaning shifts of derivatives. Miklošič had also pointed out of the relationship between word-formation andsyntax, and thus to him we may ascribe the concept of syntactic word-formation.
The formational peculiarities of verbal nouns and of other substantival derivatives with respect to verbal aspect and (in)transitive verbs are presented by R. Perušek, A. Breznik and A.Bajec. Finally, all suffixal formants are classified in twenty-four groups.
Today the research of J. Toporišič and A. Vidovič Muha are based on the cause and effect relationship between syntax and word-formation and their research opens new possibilities for further research in Slovene word-formation theory.
Downloads
References
Bajec, A., 1950/52: Besedotvorje slovenskega jezika I–IV. Ljubljana.
Bezlaj, F., 1948: Doneski k poznavanju glagolskega aspekta. Slavistična revija 1, 199–220.
Bohorič, A., 1584: Articae horulae succisivae. Wittenberg. Zimske urice proste. Prevedel in spremno besedo napisal J. Toporišič. (Maribor 1987).
Breznik, A., 1916: Slovenska slovnica za srednje šole. Celovec.
Breznik, A., 1944: Zloženke v slovenščini. Ljubljana: AZU 11. 55–76.
Breznik, A., 1982: Jezikoslovne razprave. Izbral in uredil J. Toporišič. Ljubljana: Slovenska matica. 5–458.
Dajnko, P., 1824: Lehrbuch der Windilchen Sprache. Grätz.
Gutsman, O., 1777: Windiʃche Sprachlehre. Grätz.
Janežič, A., 1854: Slovenska slovnica s kratkim pregledom slovenskega slovstva. Celovec (še 2. izd. 1863, 5. izd. 1876, 6. izd. 1889, 7. izd. 1894, 8. izd. 1900).
Kopitar, J., 1808: Grammatik der Slaviʃchen Sprache in Krain, Kärntenn und Steyermark. Ljubljana.
Levstik, F., 1858 a: nav. po izd. 1956. Jezikovni spisi. X. knjiga Levstikovega ZD. Ljubljana: DZS.
Levstik, F., 1858 b: nav. po izd. 1956. Napake slovenskega pisanja. VI. knjiga ZD. Ljubljana: DZS.
Metelko, F., 1825: Lehrgebäude der Sloweniʃchen Sprache im Königreiche Illyrien und in den benachbarten Provinzen. Ljubljana.
Miklošič, F., 1865: Die Verba impersonalia im Slavischen. Wien.
Miklošič, F., 1868–1874: Vergleichende Syntax der slavischen Sprachen. Wien. 125–249.
Miklošič, F., 1875: Vergleichende Stammbildungslehre der slavischen Sprachen. Wien
Perušek, R., 1890: Zloženke v novej slovenščini. Novo mesto. 3–42.
Pohlin, M., 1768: Kraynska grammatika. Ljubljana. 112–117
Prunt, E., 1983: Textologische Grundlagen und lexikologische Untersuchung seiner Sprache. Graz.
Sket, J., 1893: Slovenisches Sprach und Ubungsbuch Nebʃt Chreʃtomathie und sloveniʃch-deutʃchem und deutʃch-sloveniʃchem Wörter-Verzeichnis. Celovec. 296 str.
Sket, J., 1906: Janežičeva Slovenska slovnica v predelavi Jakoba Sketa, 3. del = Besedotvorje. Celovec. 123–134.
Toporišič, J., 1976: Slovenska slovnica. Raba glagolskih oblik. Maribor: Obzorja. 338–339.
Toporišič, J., 1980: Kopitarjeva slovnica – oblikoslovje. SR XXVIIIl4. 395–413.
Toporišič, J., 1981: Norma in predpis v Kopitarjevi slovnici. SR XXIXl2. 123–148.
Toporišič, J., 1983: Pohlinova slovnica. XIX. SSJLK. Ljubljana. 95–128.
Toporišič, J., 1984 a: Oblikoslovje v Bohoritevih Zimskih uricah. XX. SSJLK. 189–222.
Toporišič, J., 1984 b: Gutsmanova slovnica. Dunajski slavistitni almanah. Wien. 209–225.
Vidovič Muha, A., 1984 c: Struktura glagolskih tvorjenk v Trubarjevi Cerkovni ordningi. SR XXXIIl3. 245–256.
Vidovič Muha, A., 1986 a: Neglagolske tvorjenke v Trubarjevi Cerkovni ordningi (16. stoletje v slovenskem jeziku, književnosti in kulturi). Obdobja 6. Ljubljana. 349–374.
Vidovič Muha, A., 1988: SSB ob primerih zloženk. Ljubljana.
Vidovič Muha, A., 1992: Besedotvorna tipologija »novoslovenskega« gradiva pri Miklošiču. Miklošičev zbornik. 173–191.
Vodnik, V., 1811: Piʃmenoʃ ali Grammatika sa Perve Shole, Ljubljana.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
