Natural Syntax: Stylistic contrast between two syntactic variants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/JZ.22.1.6948Keywords:
English, Natural Syntax, syntactic variant, stylistic contrast, dependent clauseAbstract
In the framework of Natural Syntax (the basics of which are summarized in the Appen‑ dix), this article focuses on certain pairs of syntactic variants between which a stylistic contrast obtains (e.g., one variant being formal, the other informal). Natural syntax can predict the assignment of stylistic contrasts within two variants. The language material is English. Altogether, sixteen cases of stylistic contrast are discussed.
Downloads
References
Andersen 1972 = Henning Andersen, Diphthongization, Language 48 (1972), 11–50.
Collins Cobuild 1990 = Collins Cobuild English Grammar, London: Collins, 1990.
Havers 1931 = Havers, Wilhelm, Handbuch der erklärenden Syntax, Heidelberg: Winter, 1931.
Huddleston – Pullum 2002 = Rodney Huddleston – Geoffrey K. Pullum, The Cambridge grammar of the English language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Mayerthaler 1981 = Willi Mayerthaler, Morphologische Natürlichkeit, Wiesbaden: Athenaion, 1981.
Quirk idr. 1985 = Randolph Quirk – Sidney Greenbaum – Geoffrey Leech – Jan Svartvik, A comprehensive grammar of the English language, London: Longman, 1985.
Siebenreich 2016 = Nika Siebenreich, Delovanje naravnega oblikoslovja: doktorska disertacija, Filozofska fakulteta v Ljubljani, Ljubljana: [N. Siebenreich], 2016. – Razmnoženo.
SSKJ = Slovar slovenskega knjižnega jezika, Ljubljana: SAZU oz. ZRC SAZU, 1970–1991
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter