Praetorius Versus Zarlino: The Question of Modes

Authors

  • Nejc Sukljan Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/dmd15.1-2.05

Keywords:

Gioseffo Zarlino, Michael Praetorius, music theory, modes

Abstract

This article deals with the question of modes as it is discussed in Gioseffo Zarlino’s Istitutioni harmoniche and Michael Praetorius’s Syntagma musicum. First, Gioseffo Zarlino’s adoption of Heinrich Glarean’s system of twelve modes is presented, along with the changes he introduced. Gioseffo Zarlino’s system is then compared to that of Michael Praetorius.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barker, Andrew. Greek Musical Writings II: Harmonic and Acoustic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585753.

Bélis, Annie. “Aristoxenus”. In Grove Music Online. Accessed 25 March 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.01248.

Calvisius, Sethus. Exercitationes musicae duae. Leipzig: Schnell, Apel, 1600.

Dahlhaus, Carl. Studies on the Origin of Harmonic Tonality. Translated by Robert O. Gjerdingen. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. http://doi.org/10.1515/9781400861316.

Glarean, Heinrich. Dodecachordon I. Translated by Clement A. Miller. [Dallas, TX]: American Institute of Musicology, 1965.

Judd, Christle Collins. “Renaissance modal theory: theoretical, compositional, and editorial perspectives.” In The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory, edited by Thomas Christensen, 364–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Lester, Joel. Between Modes and Keys: German Theory 1592–1802. Stuyvesant: Pendragon Press, 1989.

Palisca, Claude V. Humanism in Italian Renaissance Musical Thought. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.

Palisca, Claude V. Music and Ideas in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Edited by Thomas J. Mathiesen. Studies in the History of Music Theory and Literature. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2006. http://doi.org/10.5406/j.ctt1xcmq8.

Plato. The Republic. Translated by Tom Griffith. Edited by G. R. F. Ferrari. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Powers, Harold S. et al. “Mode. III. Modal theories and polyphonic music”. In Grove Music Online. Accessed 21 September 2019. https://doi-org.nukweb.nuk.uni-lj.si/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.43718.

Praetorius, Michael. Syntagma musicum I: Musicae artis analecta. Wittenberg: J. Richter, 1614/15. Facsimile edition, edited by Wilibald Gurlitt. Documenta musicologica 1, Druckschriften-Faksimiles 21. Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1959.

Praetorius, Michael. Syntagma musicum III: Termini musici. Wolfenbüttel: Elias Holwein, 1619. Facsimile edition, edited by Wilibald Gurlitt. Documenta musicologica 1, Druckschriften-Faksimiles 15. Kassel: Bärnreiter, 1958.

Praetorius, Michael. Syntagma musicum III. Translated and edited by Jeffery Kite-Powell. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.

Wiering, Frans. The Language of the Modes: Studies in the History of Polyphonic Modality. New York: Routledge, 2001.

Zarlino, Gioseffo. L’istituzioni armoniche. Edited by Silvia Urbani. Treviso: Diastema, 2011.

Zarlino, Gioseffo. Le istitutioni harmoniche. Venice, 1558.

Zarlino, Gioseffo. De tutte l’opere del R. M Gioseffo Zarlino da Chioggia I: L’istitutioni harmoniche. Venice: Francesco de’ Francesci Senese, 1589.

Zarlino, Gioseffo. De tutte l’opere del R. M Gioseffo Zarlino da Chioggia II: Le dimostrationi har-moniche. Venice: Francesco de’ Francesci Senese, 1589.

Zarlino, Gioseffo. On the Modes. Translated by Vered Cohen. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-30

How to Cite

Sukljan, N. (2019). Praetorius Versus Zarlino: The Question of Modes. De Musica Disserenda, 15(1-2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.3986/dmd15.1-2.05

Issue

Section

Articles