Geophysical prospecting in Slovenia

An overview from the year 1990 with some observations related to the natural environment

Authors

  • Branko Mušič

Abstract

Decades of geophysical investigations for archaeological purposes at the Department of Archaeology, the University of Ljubljana, have produced a series of useful information for academic archaeological analyses as well as for the protection of the archaeological cultural heritage from construction intervention. It is my opinion that cooperation with the archaeological profession is constructive as it substantially contributes to the attainment of reflective information on the results of archaeological excavations and other archaeological sources, all of which have augmented into a combined research plan for the future. The success of this cooperation is clearly illustrated already by the database including more than 150 locations at home and abroad, also presenting good potential for being incorporated in theoretic discussions concerning the potential of applied geophysics in archaeology. One of the main problems with archaeological prospecting is still the evaluation of the suitability of individual techniques with regard to the various natural environments and the types of archaeological remains. This is a rather ambitious theme that I am opening to discussion with this article. Numerous problems will obviously remain unsolved even with the publishing of this article; the solutions that I am presenting are the result of my own experience and I thus ground them on my own data exclusively. I shall illustrate my thoughts on this theme with the results of select investigations which satisfactorily describe the possibilities provided by geophysical prospecting for the detection of certain characteristic types of archaeological remains in diverse natural environments. The majority of these investigations have already been published in the archaeological literature, for this reason I have limited the scope of this article to those data that contribute, from various points of view, to the clarification of the potential of geophysical prospecting under diverse working conditions. The results from geophysical investigations on prehistoric sites are still lacking of any applicable conclusions, despite the relatively large number of investigations that were carried out within the framework of archaeological prospecting primarily along the routes anticipated for the construction of highways; for this reason I shall for the most part present the research determinations attained through investigations on Roman sites in various natural environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BECKER, H. 1995, From nanotesla to picotesla - a new window for magnetic prospecting in archaeology. - Archaeological prospection 2/4, 217-228.

BEVAN, B. W. 1996a, Geophysical exploration for archaeology. Volume A: Archaeological question and answers. - Geosight technical report 4.

BEVAN, B. W. 1996b, Geophysical Exploration for Archaeology. Volume B: Introduction to geophysical exploration. - Geosight Technical Report 4.

BEVAN, B. W. 1996c, Geophysical Exploration for Archaeology. Volume C: Detailed survey procedures. - Geosight Technical Report 4.

BINTLIFF, J., C. GAFFNEY, A. WATTERS, B. DAVIES and A. SNODGRASS, 1990, Trace metal accumulation in soils on and around ancient settlements in Greece. - In: Man’s role in the shaping of the eastern Mediterranean landscape, 159-172.

BOUCHER, A. R. 1996, Archaeological feedback in geophysics. - Archaeological prospection 3/3, 129-140.

CARR, C. 1982, Handbook on soil resistivity surveying. - Center for American Archaeology press (research series, volume 2), Evanston.

CLARK, A. 1990, Seeing beneath the soil (Prospecting methods in Archaeology). - London.

DABAS, M. and B. MUŠIČ 1997, Bilan des prospections géophy-siques. - In: Rapport annuel d’activite scientifique1997, 199-210, Centre archéologique européen du Mont Beuvray.

DAVIS, J. C. 1973, Statistics and data analysis in geology. - New York.

DIMC, F. and B. MUŠIČ 1996, Usklajevanje metod za ka-rakterizacijo arheoloških materialov z meritvami magnetne susceptibilnosti (Harmonization of the characterization methods for archaeological materials with magnetic suscepti-bility measurements). - In: Kovine, zlitine, tehnologije (Metals, Alloys, Technologies) 30/1-2, 111-115, Ljubljana.

DIMC, F., B. MUŠIČ and R. OSREDKAR 1994, Magnetic susceptibility measurements as a quantitative support for characterization of archaeological materials. - Rudarsko-metalurški zbornik 41, 225-230.

DONEUS, M. and W. NEUBAUER 1998, 2D combination of prospection data. - Archaeological Prospection 5/1, 29-56.

EDER-HINTERLEITNER, A., W. NEUBAUER and P. MELI-CHAR 1996, Restoring magnetic anomalies. - Archaeological prospection 3/4, 185-197.

FINETTI, I. R. 1992, Monograph on the geophysical exploration of the Selinunte archaeological park. - Bolletino di geofisica, teorica ed applicata 34, 83-232.

GABROVEC, S. 1966, Latensko obdobje na Gorenjskem. - Arh. vest. 17, 243-262.

GABROVEC, S. 1975, Ajdovski gradec. - In: ANSl, 164, Lju-bljana.

HEATHCOTE, C. and A. ASPINALL 1981, Some aspects of the use of fluxgate magnetometers (gradiometers) in geophysical prospection in archaeology. - Revue d’Archéo-métrie 5, 61-70.

KUZMA, I., J. HANZELYOVÁ, J. RAJTÁR and J. TIRPÁK 1996, New results in aerial archaeology in Slovakia: ex-perience with reconnaissance, geophysical measurement and follow-up excavations. - Archaeological prospection3/2, 71-80.

LADEFOGED, T. N., S. M. McLACHLAN, S. C. L. ROSS, P. J. SHEPPARD and D. G. SUTTON 1995, GIS-based image enhancement of conductivity and magnetic susceptibility data from Ureturituri Pa and Fort Resolution, New Zealand. - American Antiquity 60, 3, 471-481.

LAZAR, I. 1997, The Roman tile factory at Vransko near Celeia (Noricum). Part one: excavation report. - Acta Rei Cret. Rom. Faut. 35, 159-164.

LEBEN, A. 1975, Škocjan. - In: ANSl, 132, Ljubljana.

LINFORD, P. and P. COTTRELL 1994a, The English heritage geophysical survey database (short report). - Archaeological prospection 1/1, 71-72.

LINFORD, P. and P. COTTRELL 1994b, The English heritage geophysical survey database: an update (short report). - Ar-chaeological prospection 1/2, 133-134.

MARCHESETTI, C. 1903, I castellieri preistorici di Trieste e della Regione Giulia. - Trieste.

MARTON, P. 1998, Magnetic directional data for Hungary and their application for archaeomagnetic dating. - In: Kolto, L. and L. Bartosiewicz (eds.), Archaeometrical research in Hungary 2, 71-74.

MIKL CURK, I. 1970, Zapažanja ob orientacijskem raziskovan-ju arheološkega terena na Vrhniki z merjenjem specifične upornosti tal. - Var. spom. 13-14, 39-40.

MUŠIČ, B. 1993, Odkrivanje arheoloških ostalin pred gradbenimi posegi v prostor z nedestruktivnimi metodami. - In: Cestarski dnevi’93. Zbornik kratkih vsebin referatov, 189-191.

MUŠIČ, B. 1994, Geophysikalische Untersuchungen und ar-chäologische Denkmalpflege. - Arch. Austr. 78, 9-19.

MUŠIČ, B. 1994-1995, Geofizika in varovanje arheološke dediščine. - Var. spom. 36, 59-72.

MUŠIČ, B. 1996, Geofizikalne raziskave antičnega podeželja Slovenije. - In: Rimsko podeželje / Roman countryside, Raz-prave FF, 83-137, Ljubljana.

MUŠIČ, B. 1997, Magnetic susceptibility measurements in dolinas. - Annales 10, 37-42.

MUŠIČ, B. and F. DIMC 1994, Magnetna susceptibilnost kot kvantitativni kriterij za razvrščanje arheoloških materialov. - Arheo 16, 37-44.

MUŠIČ, B. and L. ORENGO 1998, Magnetometrične raziskave železnodobnega talilnega kompleksa na Cvingerju pri Meniški vasi. - Arh. vest. 49, 157-180.

MUŠIČ, B. and B. SLAPŠAK 1998, GIS in on-site analysis: Rodik, Slovenia. Cost action G2: Paysages antiques et structures rurales. - In: The use of geographic information systems in the study of ancient landscapes and features related to ancient land use, 81-93.

MUŠIČ, B., B. SLAPŠAK and V. PERKO 1999, The Roman site of Rodik: surface distributions and geophysical prospec-tions. - In: Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages, Populus project (Siena colloquium), 132-146.

MUŠIČ, B., B. SLAPŠAK, S. PIRC, N. ZUPANČIČ, F. DIMC and L. TROJAR 1995, On-site prospection in Slovenia: the case of Rodik. - Archaeological Computing Newsletter 43, 6-15.

NISHIMURA, Y. and H. KAMAI 1991, A study on the appli-cation of geophysical prospection. - In: Archaeometry ‘90, 757-763.

OREHEK, S. 1972, Eocenski fliš Pivške kotline in Brkinov. - In: VII Kongres geologa SFRJ 2, 253-270.

OREHEK, S. and M. SILVESTER 1964, Poročilo o sedimentno petrografski preiskavi eocenskega fliša - list Ilirska Bistrica, 11 p. - Ljubljana (Typed report. Archive of Geološki zavod, Ljubljana).

OREHEK, S. and M. SILVESTER 1967, Sedimentno petro-grafske preiskave eocenskega fliša - list Ilirska Bistrica 51, 52, 24 p. - Ljubljana (Typed report. Archive of Geološki zavod, Ljubljana).

PAPAMARINOPOULOS, P., G. N. TSOKAS and H. WILLIAMS 1985, Magnetic and electric measurements on the island of Lesbos and the detection of buried ancient relics. - Geo-exploration 23, 483-490.

PAPAMARINOPOULOS, P., G. N. TSOKAS and H. WILLIAMS 1986, Electric resistance and resistivity measurements and magnetic mapping of the archaeological relics on the castle of Mytilene. - Bolletino Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata28, 111-112.

PAYNE, A. 1996, The use of magnetic prospection in the ex-ploration of iron age hillfort interiors in Southern England. - Archaeological prospection 3/4, 163-196.

PETRU, P. 1970-1971, Sondi pri Sv. Martinu v Malencah. - Arh. vest. 21-22, 163-166.

SCHURR, M. R. 1997, Using the concept of the learning curve to increase the productivity of geophysical surveys. - Archa-eological prospection 4/2, 69-83.

SLAPŠAK, B. 1978, Rodik - Ajdovščina. - Arh. vest. 29, 546-547.

SLAPŠAK, B. 1985, Ajdovščina nad Rodikom. - Arh. preg. 26, 135-136.

SLAPŠAK, B. 1988, Defining the economic space of a typical Iron Age hillfort: Rodik, Yugoslavia, a case study. - In: Bintliff, J., D. Davidson and E. Grant (eds.), Conceptual issues in environmental archaeology, 95-107.

SMEKALOVA, T., O. VOSS, and N. ABRAHAMSEN 1993, Magnetic investigation of iron-smelting centres at Snorup, Denmark. - Archaeologia Polona 31, 83-103.

STRITAR, A. 1990, Krajina. Krajinski sistemi. Raba in varstvo tal v Sloveniji. - Ljubjana.

TECCO HVALA, S. 1992, Kataster arheoloških najdišč Slovenije ali zgodba o nastanku neke računalniške baze podat-kov (prvi del). - Arheo 15, 62-64.

TELFORD, W. M., L. P. GELDART and R. E. SHERIFF 1990, Applied geophysics. - Cambridge.

TURK, P. 1994-1995, Škocjan. - Var. spom. 37, 306.

VALIČ, A. 1997, Arheološki drobci vojaških prvin pozne rim-ske dobe na Gorenjskem. - Arh. vest. 48, 261-268.

VIDRIH PERKO, V. 1997, Rimskodobna keramika z Ajdovščine pri Rodiku. - Arh. vest. 48, 341-358.

VOGRIN, A. 1990, Situacija arheoloških izkopanin; arheološko najdišče Buče - Groblje. Manuskriptna karta v merilu 1:200. - Archive of ZVNKD, Celje.

WATERS, A. 1989, Merjenje specifične upornosti tal v arheo-loškem terenskem pregledu na področju Slovenije. - Arheo9, 74-77.

ZUPANČIČ, N. 1990, Geokemične lastnosti tal v Istri in Slo-venskem primorju glede na matično kamnino. - Master thesis, Ljubljana

Downloads

Published

1999-01-01

How to Cite

Mušič, B. . (1999). Geophysical prospecting in Slovenia: An overview from the year 1990 with some observations related to the natural environment. Arheološki Vestnik, 50. Retrieved from https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/av/article/view/8228

Issue

Section

Special issue: 50th jubilee of the journal