Analysis of the osseous points from Potočka zijalka in relation to their stratigraphic and spatial position. Testing the hypothesis of the evolution of Aurignacian solid-based points on the examples of Potočka zijalka and La Ferrassie

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/AV.76.17

Keywords:

osseous points with a massive base, development, Aurignacien, Potočka zijalka, La Ferrassie

Abstract

The article deals with the flattening quotient (maximum width / maximum thickness) of osseous points with massive base from the sites of Potočka zijalka, Slovenia (117 points) and La Ferrassie, France (91 points) in connection with the assumption about the evolutionary trends of these points in relative time as represented by the original stratigraphy of the two sites. We assume that the development was aimed at increasing the strength of the points used for spears, javelins and perhaps also arrows. While the tendency of flattening quotient of the deer antler points at La Ferrassie is consistent with the evolutionary hypothesis, this is not quite the case with the osseous points from Potočka zijalka. In La Ferrassie, the use of deer antlers, which was transferred from split-based points to points with a massive base, required a different technical solutions of strength than in Potočka zijalka, where bone replaced antler as the raw material for making points. This allowed for better technical results. For various reasons, in which the raw material played an important role, the development of the points in Potočka zijalka was not as straightforward as in La Ferrassie.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ivan Turk

Lunačkova 4
SI-1000 Ljubljana

Matija Turk

Znanstvenoraziskovalni center SAZU
Inštitut za arheologijo
Novi trg 2
SI-1000 Ljubljana

References

ALBRECHT, G. 1977, Testing of materials as used for bone points of the Upper Palaeolithic. – V: H. Champs-Faber (ur.), Méthodologie appliquée à l‘industrie de l‘os préhistorique, Paris, 119–126.

BARCELO, J. A. 2015, Measuring, counting and explaining: An introduction to mathematics in archaeology. – V: J. A. Barcelo, I. Bogdanovic, (ur.), Mathematics and Archaeology, Boca Raton, 3–64.

BOLUS, M., N. J. CONARD 2006, Zur Zeitstellung von Geschossspitzen aus organischen Materialen im späten Mittelpaläolithikum und Aurignacien. – Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 36/1, 1–15.

BRODAR, M. 1985, Die Höhlen Potočka zijalka und Mok-riška jama. – Quartär 35/36, 69–80.

BRODAR, M. 1986, Jama v Lozi (Gravettien in der Höhle Jama v Lozi). – Arheološki vestnik 37, 23–75.

BRODAR, M. 1987, Izrobljene konice (Die Kerbspitzen). – Arheološki vestnik 38, 13–33.

BRODAR, S., M. BRODAR 1983, Potočka zijalka. Visokoalpska postaja aurignacienskih lovcev / Potočka zijalka. Eine hochalpine Aurignacjägerstation. – Dela 1. Razreda SAZU 24/13.

CATTELAIN, P. 2010, Les armes. – V: M. Otte (ur.), Les Aurignaciens, Paris, 113–135.

DOBOSI, V. T. 2002, Bone finds from Istállós-kő cave. – Praehistoria 3, 79–104.

DÖPPES, D. 2004, Carnivores and marmots from the Upper Pleistocene sediments of Potočka zijalka (Slovenia). – V: M. Pacher, V. Pohar, G. Rabeder (ur.), Potočka zijalka. Palaeontological and archaeological results of the campaigns 1997–2000, Mitteillungen der Kommission für Quartärforschung der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 13, 67–80.

DOYON, L. 2013, L‘apport du réaffûtage à la variabilité morphométrique des pointes de projectile aurignaciennes en bois de cervidé. – Magistrsko delo / Master‘s thesis, Département d‘anthropologie, Faculté des Arts et des Sciences, Montréal (neobjavljeno / unpublished). https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/handle/1866/10243

DOYON, L. 2017, La variabilité technologique et morphométrique des pointes de projectile aurignaciennes en matière osseuse. Implications cognitives, sociales et environnementales. – Doktorsko delo / PhD thesis, Université de Bordeaux, Université de Montréal (neobjavljeno / unpublished). https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/handle/1866/20414

DOYON, L. 2019, On the shape of things: A geometric morphometrics approach to investigate Aurignacian group membership. – Journal of Archaeological Science 101, 99–114.

DOYON, L., H. K. KNECHT 2014, The effects of use and resharpening on morphometric variability of Aurignacian antler projectile points. – Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Urgescichte 23, 83–101.

GOUTAS, N. 2013, De Brassempouy à Kostienki: l‘exploitation technique des ressources animales dans l‘Europe gravettienne. – V: M. Otte (ur.), Les Gravettiens, Paris – Arles, 105–160.

GOUTAS, N. 2017, Gravettian Projectile Points: Considerations About the Evolution of Osseous Hunting Weapons in France. – V: M. C. Langley (ur.), Osseous Projectile Weaponry. Towards an Understanding of Pleistocene Cultural Variability, Dordrecht, 89–107.

HAHN, J. 1977, Aurignacien. Das ältere Jungpaläolithikum in Mittel- und Osteuropa. – Fundamenta A 9.

HORUSITZKY, F. Z. 2007, Les pointes organiques aurignaciennes et moustériennes de Divje babe I, Slovénie. Reconstruction des pointes par la théorie de flambage.

HORUSITZKY, F. Z. 2008, Reconstruction des pointes organiques aurignaciennes de la Dzeravá skala (Pálffy-barlang), Slovaquie. / Reconstructions of organic Aurignacian points from the Dzeravá skala cave (Pálffy-barlang), Slovakia. – L‘anthropologie 112, 201–246.

LEROY-PROST, C. 1979a, L‘industrie osseuse aurignacienne. Essai régional de classification: Poitou, Charente, Périgord. – Gallia préhistoire 18, 65–156.

LEROY-PROST, C. 1979b, L‘industrie osseuse aurignacienne. Essai régional de classification: Poitou, Charente, Périgord (suite). – Gallia préhistoire 22/1, 205–370.

MALEZ, M. 1967, Paleolit Velike pećine na Ravnoj gori u sjeverozapadnoj Hrvatskoj. / Das Paläolithikum der Höhle Velika pećina auf der Ravna gora (NW Kroatien). – Arheološki radovi i rasprave 4–5, 7–64.

MOREAU et al 2015 = L. Moreau, B. Odar, A. Horvat, T. Higham, P. Turk, D. Pirkmajer 2015. Reassessing the Aurignacian of Slovenia: lithic techno-economic behaviour and direct dating of osseous projectile points. – Journal of Human Evolution 78,158–180.

ODAR, B. 2011, Archers at Potočka zijalka? / Lokostrelci v Potočki zijalki? – Arheološki vestnik 62, 433–456.

ODAR, B. 2014, Potočka Zijavka (Slovenia) – excavation campaign 2012. – Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt, 44/2, 137–148.

OWEN, L. R. 2013, Sewing and Weaving with Osseous Points – A New Look at Upper Paleolithic ‘Projectile’ Points. – Erlangen Studien zur Prähistorische Archäologie 1, 169–175.

PACHER, M. 2010, Raw material analysis of Upper Palaeolithic bone points and the invention of the Olschewian. – Mitteilungen der Prähistorischen Kommission der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 72, 319–325.

PEYRONY, D. 1934, La Ferrassie. Moustérien – Périgordien – Aurignacien. – Préhistoire 3, Fascicule unique, Paris.

PFEIFER et al. 2019 = S. J. Pfeifer, W. L. Hartramph, R. D. Kahlke, F. A. Müller 2019, Mammoth ivory was the most suitable osseous material for the production of Late Pleistocene big game projectile points. – Scientific Reports 9/2303, 1–10. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-38779-1

POHAR, V. 2004, Stone and bone artefacts from the excavations 1927–2000 in Potočka zijalka (Slovenia). – V: M. Pacher, V. Pohar, G. Rabeder (ur.), Potočka zijalka. Palaeontological and archaeological results of the campaigns 1997–2000, Mitteillungen der Kommission für Quartärforschung der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 13, 211–216.

RABEDER, G., V. POHAR 2004, Stratigraphy and chronology of the cave sediments from Potočka zijalka (Slovenia), – V: M. Pacher, V. Pohar, G. Rabeder (ur.), Potočka zijalka. Palaeontological and archaeological results of the campaigns 1997–2000, Mitteillungen der Kommission für Quartärforschung der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 13, Wien, 235–246.

RAKOVEC, I. 1938, Ein Moschusochs aus der Höhle Potočka zijalka. – Prirodoslovne razprave 3, 253–262.

RAMSEY, C. B. 2015, Bayesian approaches to the building of archaeological chronologies. – V: J. A. Barcelo, I. Bogdanovic (ur.), Mathematics and Archaeology, Boca Raton, 272–292.

SKABERNE, D., I. TURK, J. TURK 2015, The Pleistocene clastic sediments in the Divje babe I cave, Slovenia. Palaeoclimate (part 1). – Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 438, 395–407.

TEJERO, J.-M., M. CHRISTENSEN, P. BODU 2012, Red deer antler technology and early modern humans in Southeast Europe: an experimental study. – Journal of Archaeological Science 39, 332–346.

TURK, I. 2002, Morfometrična analiza zgodnjih koščenih konic v povezavi z najdbami koščenih konic iz Divjih bab I. / Morphometric analysis of early bone points in connection with finds of bone points from Divje babe I. – Arheološki vestnik 53, 9–29.

TURK, I. 2005, Zagovor morfometrične analize koščenih konic. / In defence of morphometric analysis of bone points. – Arheološki vestnik 56, 453–464.

TURK, I. (ur.), 2007, Divje babe I. Paleolitsko najdišče mlajšega pleitocena v Sloveniji. 1. Del / Divje babe I. Upper Pleistocene Palaeolithic site in Slovenia. Part I, Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae 13.

TURK, J. 2011a, Klimatostratigrafska umestitev sedimentov v zahodnem sektorju Potočke zijalke na podlagi rekonstrukcije snežnih razmer v času njihovega odlaganja / Climatostratigraphic classification of sediments in the western sector of Potočka zijalka, based on reconstruction of snow conditions at the time of their deposition. – V: B. Toškan (ur.), Drobci ledenodobnega okolja, Zbornik ob življenskem jubileju Ivana Turka / Fragments of Ice Age Environments, Proceedings in Honour of Ivan Turk‘s Jubilee, Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae 21, 209 – 217.

TURK, J. 2011b, Geoarchaeological research into Palaeolithic cave sites as a source of palaeoenvironmental data / Geoarheološke raziskave v paleolitskih jamskih najdiščih kot vir paleookoljskih podatkov. – Arheološki vestnik 62, 9–31.

TURK, M., I. TURK 2020, Aurignacian osseous points from the Potočka zijalka cave (Slovenia). Interpreting the new results of a morphometric statistical analysis. / Orinjasjenske koščene konice iz Potočke zijalke. Razlaga novih rezultatov morfometriče statistične analize. – Arheološki vestnik 71, 7–75.

TURK, M., J. TURK 2023, On the significance of Divje babe I cave for the stratigraphy, sedimentology, and chronology of Palaeolithic cave sites in Slovenia. / O pomenu jame Divje babe I za stratigrafijo, sedimentologijo in kronologijo jamskih paleolitskih najdišč v Sloveniji. – Arheološki vestnik 74, 7–38.

VILLAVERDE et al. 2017 = V. Villaverde, J. E. Aura Tortosa, M. Borao, D. Roman 2017, Upper Paleolithic Bone and Antler Projectiles in the Spanish Mediterranean Region: The Magdalenian Period. – V: M. C. Langley (ur.), Osseous Projectile Weaponry. Towards an Understanding of Pleistocene Cultural Variability, Dordrecht, 109–130.

VERPOORTE, A. 2012, Caching and retooling in Potočka zijalka (Slovenia). Implications for Late Aurignacian land use strategies. – Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 42/2, 135–151.

VUKOSAVLJEVIĆ, N., I. KARAVANIĆ 2017, Epigravettian shouldered points in the eastern Adriatic and its hinterland: reconsidering their chronological position. – Acta Archeologica Carpathica 52, 5–21.

WOLF et al. 2016 = S. Wolf, S. C. Münzel, K. Dotzel, M. M., Barth, N. J. Conard 2016, Projectile Weaponry from the Aurignacian to the Gravettian of the Swabian Jura (Southwest Germany): Raw Materials, Manufacturing and Typology. – V: M. C. Langley (ur.), Osseous Projectile Weaponry. Towards an Understanding of Pleistocene Cultural Variability, Dordrecht, 71–87.

Published

2025-06-27

How to Cite

Turk, I., & Turk, M. (2025). Analysis of the osseous points from Potočka zijalka in relation to their stratigraphic and spatial position. Testing the hypothesis of the evolution of Aurignacian solid-based points on the examples of Potočka zijalka and La Ferrassie. Arheološki Vestnik, 76, 7–32. https://doi.org/10.3986/AV.76.17

Issue

Section

Prehistory