The Illyrian Burial Place at Zgornja Hajdina near Ptuj
Abstract
Hie results of the most im portant^ discovery of the Illyrian settlem ent on the C astle of P tu j (1946-47) and of the excavation of the Illyrian-H allstatt necropolis in L jubi ja n a (1948-49) — both m ade by Professor Korošec — w ere a series of im portant archaeological data solving chiefly problem s of the Slavonian culture in its final phases; at the sam e tim e those results are throw ing light upon the origin and the first periods of the Iron Age on our te rrito ry . I lie problem s of th at period will be solved by the help of the m aterial of some necropoles w hich has not been sufficiently treated as yet. In our m useum s the m aterial of those necropoles was labelled as »Earlier H allstatt«. It is chiefly from some burying places in the surroundings of M aribor (Pobrežje, Sp. R advanje, M aribor — Titova ulica, Sv. Benedikt v Slov. goricah), from earlier necropoles of Rifnik, Vače, L jubljana, O strožnih, and, finally, from the burying place at Zg. H ajdina near Ptuj. In 1906 at Zg. H ajdina near P tu j a burial place w ith flat bu rn t graves was excavated; the excavations w ere going on in 1907. Two short reports only (see note 3 and 5) w ere published about those investigations by Škabar. The g reater p a rt of the m aterial becam e the property of the Museum of P tu j; some p o tte ry was divided betw een the Museum of M aribor and the Johanneum in Graz. The author is m ainly referring to the objects displayed in the Museum of P tu j and, partly, to the ones of the Museum of M aribor, w ithout considering the m aterial of the Johanneum in G raz as it was not available. The data about the site being scarce it is im possible either to form an opinion about a more, exact w ay of interm ent o r to arran g e th e m aterial according to the graves. Even the num ber of excavated graves is unknown, b u t judging by the objects, th ere m ust have been at least 150 graves. This is w hy we are com pelled to tre a t the object from typological point of view which at the same tim e is the only resource of the following reflections. F irst of all the necropolis of H ajdina has yielded a m ultitude of pottery. Besides tw o m edium -sized urns the graves contained mostly sm aller vessels none of w hich w ere higher than 20 cm. The pottery m ay b e divided into six m ain types : sm aller tw o-handled urns, egg-shaped oval pots, cups w ith ribbon[1]shaped handles rising above the rim, conical or sem i-spherical vessels, terrines and m edium -sized urns. Of all above-m entioned pottery types the most cha[1]racteristic for the H ajdina b u rial place are sm all urns w ith ribbon-shaped handles, and terrines. A fter having analyzed the shapes we m ay form the opinion th a t th e developm ent has taken place from baggy forms w ith a wide rounded-off m axim al periphery and a low cylindrical neck to vessels w ith a conical neck sharply distinguished from the shoulder, to vessels w ith definitely longitudinal necks; the neck had become higher by th e low er p a rt of the vessel having been lowered. In su d i cases the vessel is very conical and has a shatp m axim al periphery. W hen th ere is an ornam ent it does not rep resen t only a decoration, but develops sim ultaneously w ith the shape of the vessels, helping to form a new shape by localizing on a certain p a rt of the vessel, nam ely on the shoulder; thus it is dependent on the shape of the vessel. The developm ent refers m ostly to the neck w hich finally is high, to the sharply distinguished shoulder w hich is pressed deeply dow nw ards, and to the generally biconical shape of the vessel. The earliest types represent d egenerated rem ains of form s w hich in the inventory of the Slavonian culture are labelled as am phorae w ith cylindrical necks and w ith two small handles. T here is-a rich com parative m aterial for th a t type of H ajdina po ttery from the b u rn t graves of the above-m entioned b u rial places at M aribor and its surroundings. Specimens of very sim ilar shapes w ere yielded by some Bosnian sites (Jezerine). O w ing to slight differences in ornam entation it is possible th at, typologically, th e shapes of the Slavonian culture are either the p re[1]cursors of the urns from Jezerine, or th e ir shape m ay h av e'o rig in ated in the south (Dipylon style). A sim ilar developm ent of shapes w hich in my opinion was going on from the Slavonic am phora w ith a cylindric neck and two small handles to the typologically earliest sm all H ajdina urns w ith two sm all handles has tak en place w ith th e type of the L usatian urn. In its latest phases the la tte r is very sim ilar to the shapes of H ajdina, Typologically, also terrin es a re very im portant; here we m ay notice two stages of developm ent. The e a rlier one has m ore rounded-off shapes in its profile; for th e la te r one — as w ith th e above-m entioned small urns — sharp transitions betw een single p arts of the vessel, and th e biconical scheme are characteristic. Also in ornam entation very sim ilar tendencies of developm ent m ay be traced w hich are characteristic for the sm all handled urns. In earlier specim es on the ornam ental base th e re are m otives in th e stru ctu re of w hich tendencies of v ertical dism em bering are united; in la ter specim es a conse[1]quently horizontal motive, is characteristic. A lm ost all H ajdina po ttery is m ade of a w ell-refined clay w hich is m ore o r less m ixed w ith sand, som etim es also w ith mica. The w alls of the vessels are often m echanically polished; it seem s th a t the polishing as well as the ornam entation have taken place in a half-dry stage. The vessels w ere well and intensely bu rn t, the proof thereof being th eir yellow ish brow n and grey colour. Technically, the ornam entation was perform ed by a sim ple cutting-in ; in some cases it was filled by w hite incrustation. Yet also stam ped motives (e. g. im itation of a cord) are found. Among m etal objects are to be m entioned smooth and also torded neck[1]laces w ith backw ards w ound ends, bracelets and finger-rings of tw isted wire, pins w ith conical or round heads, and frequent pins w ith rolled ends (Roll[1]nadel), spectacle fibulae o r fibulae w ith figure 8 loops, one specim en of a double looped violin-bow fibula, and flat bracelets w ith longitudinal ribs. The m ajo rity of pottery shapes of the H ajdina burying place are to be considered as a typological legacy of the Slavonian culture. In the develop[1]m ent of .the shapes of single types we m ay trace certain tendencies of m etam orphosis w hereby single shapes, being characteristic for the earlier Illyrian-H allstatt culture on th a t territory, have developed. W hile w atching this interesting transition of forms we ask: w hat relation is there betw een the representatives of the Slavonian culture and the representatives of the successive culture of the early Iron Age? W hen trying to answ er th at question on the base of typology we have several explanations. F irst: as to the m en[1]tioned typological relation and connection betw een the last Slavonian and early Iron Age culture- we have to do only w ith a sedim entation of earlier forms w hich w ere included into the culture of the representatives of later periods w ith quite an original culture. These later forms w ere transform ed on account of new tendencies of developm ent into types w hich are repre[1]sented at H ajdina, too. In such case w e should have to do w ith two different ethnic groups w hereof the later-arrived one would have taken over some forms from the earlier one on th a t territo ry , and transform ed them in the long run in its own way. Then the tendencies th a t in our w ork have dictated the already m entioned form al m etam orphoses would be the property and characteristics of the second ethnic group, and it would be this group that ought to be considered as the representative of th e Iron Age culture on that territory. Second: the m etam orphosis of a certain shape, e. g. from th e Sla[1]vonian am phora w ith two sm all handles into a double-handled urn from the H ajdina b u rial place m ay be Considered as a continuation of a shape under[1]going a necessary and law ful developm ent, respectively m etam orphosis. In the case of continuity of forms undergoing a developm ent in course of time, we must, bow erer, expect a g reater relation ais to w hat ethnic group the rep re[1]sentatives- of cultural rem ains of the H ajdina and sim ilar b u rial places belong. Beyond doubt it is possible th a t on a certain stage of developm ent the representatives of the Slavonian culture had adopted a new elem ent w hich definitely influenced the typical forms of the Slavonian culture; and it is ju st owing to the tendencies of the new elem ent m aking their infuence felt th at in the long run they lost th eir originality. O nly in th at w ay th e existence of the most elem entary features of the Slavonian culture — which was preserved as a sufficiently convincing elem ent, though degenerated in the transitional and first stages of the Iron Age — can be explained. C on[1]s e q u e n t l y the forms of the S la v o n ia n c u l t u r e w ere t r a n s f o r m e d u n d e r the i n f l u e n c e of new t e n d e n c i e s and owing to the n e c e s s i t y of d e v e l o p m e n t in to ty p e s of vessels w h i c h a r e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of t h e s o - c a l l e d H a l l s t a t t c u l tu r e , or, b e t t e r , of the l a t e r Iron Age c u l t u r e of the Illyrians. This supposition refers, of course, only to our territory. Owing to lack of d ata about the site the chronological definition of the H ajdina b u rial place is rendered rath e r d ifficu lt The relative chronology w ould be the following: The graves of H ajdina are prior to the beginning i. of the burial place at Vače and Rifnik, except some elem ents th at might be chronologically p arallel o r even earlier than th e Illyrian-H allstatt necropolis in L ju b ljan a (1948-49). They are sure to be later than the b u rial place at Pobrežje near M aribor, than the earlier graves from Titova ulica at M aribor, than som e graves from Sp. R adovanja, and th an single specim ens from Sv. Be[1]n ed ik t v Slovenskih goricah. T he low er lim it of absolute chronology is probably represented by the latest elem ents of the H ajd in a b u rial place; these are not p rio r to Benacci II, i. e. to the p erio d of the transition into 8th century. As to the num ber of graves and very different developm ent of shapes in single specim ens of pottery, the b u rial place m ight have originated during th e tran sitio n into 9th century, adm itting th a t some graves m ay be p rio r to th a t date. From typological point of view, m ore especially on account of lack of iron in the graves of H ajdina, we m ay in fe r th a t the m aterial of the H ajdina b u rial place is presenting a p ittu re of the m aterial culture of the transition betw een th e Bronze and Iron Ages.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter