A Classification of the Slavic Languages based on the material of the Slavic Linguistic Atlas: A Trial Run (original: Классификация славянских языков на материале Общеславянского лингвистического атласа: пробный шар)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/17.1.07Keywords:
slovanski jeziki, klasifikacija, dialektometrija, Slovanski lingvistični atlasAbstract
This study proposes a classification of Slavic languages based on an objective dialectometric analysis of the materials of the Slavic Linguistic Atlas. Unlike traditional classifications, which rely primarily on literary languages and are influenced by extralinguistic factors, this method focuses on the dialect continuum. The work is based on data from 6 volumes of the phonetic-grammatical series of the Slavic Linguistic Atlas, containing information on the reflexes of 7 Proto-Slavic vowels (*ě, *ę, *ǫ, *ъ, *ь, *o, *e) in 780 localities. For each reflex, linguistic characteristics (height, backness, length, rounding,
nasalization) were determined and presented as vectors. The key stage was a pairwise comparison of reflexes between all locations with the calculation of the Euclidean distance, taking into account structural differences (for example, between monophthongs and diphthongs). Based on the constructed matrix of linguistic distances, hierarchical clustering by Ward’s method was applied. The analysis revealed that, for the material considered, the optimal division of the Slavic area is into 15 clusters. The algorithm confirmed established views in Slavic dialectology, as it correctly separated the East, West, and South Slavic areas and accurately attributed locations outside state borders. However, shortcomings associated with relying solely on vocalism were also identified, the most striking of which was the erroneous unification of the Torlak and Sorbian dialects.
The study demonstrates the potential of quantitative methods to reveal the structure of a dialect continuum, free from subjective assessments. The resulting classification serves as an important benchmark but does not replace traditional approaches.
Downloads
References
Васильев, Михаил Е., Саенко, Михаил Н. 2020. Анализ топологии и оценка точности лексикостатистических классификаций (на примере славянских языков). Вопросы языкового родства, 18/3–4. 130–157. [Vasil’jev, Mikhail Je., Saenko, Mikhail N. 2020. Analiz topologii i otsenka tochnosti leksikostatisticheskikh klassifikatsii (na primere slavianskikh iazykov). Voprosy iazykovogo rodstva, 18/3–4. 130–157.]
Кузьмина, Анастасия С., Манусов, Арсений В. 2024. Диалектометрический подход к диалектной классификации восточнославянских языков на материале сборника «Восточнославянские изоглоссы». Вопросы языкового родства, 22/3–4. 342 366. [Kuz’mina, Anastasiia S., Manusov, Arsenii V. 2024. Dialektometricheskii podkhod k dialektnoi klassifikatsii vostochnoslavianskikh iazykov na materiale sbornika «Vostochnoslavianskije izoglossy». Voprosy iazykovogo rodstva, 22/3–4. 342–366.]
Марченко, Игорь А., Ронько, Роман В. 2025. Диалектные различия между востоком и западом на материале данных Диалектологического атласа русского языка: результаты многомерного шкалирования. Исследования по славянской диалектологии 25. 236–259. [Marchenko, Igor’ A., Ron’ko, Roman V. 2025. Dialektnyje razlichiia mezhdu vostokom i zapadom na
materiale dannykh Dialektologicheskogo atlasa russkogo iazyka: rezul’taty mnogomernogo shkalirovaniia. Issledovaniia po slavianskoi dialektologii 25. 236–259.]
ОЛА = Общеславянский лингвистический атлас. Серия фонетико-грамматическая, 1–9. 1988–2019. Београд, Москва, Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków, Zagreb, Скопjе, Мінск, Praha, Bratislava, Санкт-Петербург. [OLA = Obshcheslavianskii lingvisticheskii atlas. Seriia fonetiko-grammaticheskaia, 1–9. 1988–2019. Beograd, Moskva, Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków, Zagreb, Skopjje, Mīnsk, Praha, Bratislava, Sankt-Peterburg.]
Прохоров, Валентин А. 1973. Вся Воронежская земля. Краткий историко-топонимический словарь, Воронеж. [Prokhorov, Valentin A. 1973. Vsia Voronezhskaia zemlia. Kratkii istoriko-toponimicheskii slovar’, Voronezh.]
Пшеничнова, Надежда Н. 1996. Типология русских говоров, Москва. [Pshenichnova, Nadezhda N. 1996. Tipologiia russkikh govorov, Moskva.]
Старостин, Сергей А. 2007. Сравнительно-историческое языкознание и лексикостатистика. В: С. А. Старостин. Труды по языкознанию. М.: Языки славянских культур. 407–447. [Starostin, Sergei A. 2007. Sravnitel’no-istoricheskoje iazykoznanije i leksikostatistika. V: S. A. Starostin. Trudy po iazykoznaniiu. M.: Iazyki slavianskikh kul’tur. 407–447.]
Afanasev, Ilia. 2023. Cipher, transform, get lost: an anti-transparent system for distance measurement in East Slavic lects. Journal of Language Relationship, 21/3–4. 159–177.
Houtzagers, Peter, Nerbonne, John, Prokić Jelena. 2010. Quantitative and Traditional Classifications of Bulgarian Dialects Compared. Scando-Slavica 56. 29–54.
Kenda-Jež, Karmen. 2012. Slovenska narečja v Slovanskem lingvističnem atlasu (OLA). Slavistica Vilnensis, 57/2. 57–76.
Kushniarevich, Alena et al. 2015. Genetic heritage of the Balto-Slavic speaking populations: Asynthesis of autosomal, mitochondrial and Y-chromosomal data. PLoS ONE, 10/9.
Mańczak, Witold. 2006. Pochodzenie języka staro-cerkiewno-słowiańskiego a kodeks Zografski. Warszawa: Zakład Graficzny Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
McMahon, April, McMahon, Robert, 2005. Language Classification by Numbers. Oxford.
Saenko, Mikhail N. 2020. Taxonomy of Slavic Languages, History of the. In: Marc L. Greenberg, ed. Encyclopedia of Slavic Languages and Linguistics Online, Leiden.
Šekli, Matej. 2018. Tipologija lingvogenez slovanskih jezikov. Ljubljana.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-01-14 (3)
- 2026-01-14 (2)
- 2025-12-24 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
