Leksikalno procesiranje morfološko zapletenih slovenskih besed pri testu presojanja besedišča: vloga psevdobesed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/17.1.04Ključne besede:
psevdobesede, leksikalno odločanje, leksikografija, slovenščina, psiholingvistikaPovzetek
Ta študija raziskuje, kako struktura psevdobesed vpliva na pravilnost leksikalne odločitve in reakcijski čas pri slovenskih izpeljankah. Preizkusili smo tri načine tvorjenja: ročno spreminjanje z ohranjenimi priponami, ročno spreminjanje s spremenjenimi priponami in algoritemsko tvorjenje z ohranjenimi priponami; za slednje smo prilagodili in uporabili aplikacijo Wuggy (Keuleers and Brysbaert 2010). Posamezne vrste psevdobesed so se razlikovale v odzivnih časih, ne pa tudi v pravilnosti leksikalne odločitve. Vendar te razlike niso vplivale na pravilnost leksikalne odločitve in odzivni čas pri obstoječih slovenskih besedah, zato lahko rečemo, da morfološka kompleksnost oziroma ročno/algoritemsko tvorjenje prevdobesed nista ključni za leksikalno odločanje.
Prenosi
Literatura
Aguasvivas, Jose Armando, Carreiras, Manuel, Brysbaert, Marc, Mandera, Paweł, Keuleers, Emmanuel, Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni. 2018. Spalex: A Spanish Lexical Decision Database From a Massive Online Data Collection. Frontiers in Psychology 9. <https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02156>.
Angele, Bernhard, Baciero, Ana, Gómez, Pablo, Perea, Manuel. 2023. Does online masked priming pass the test? The effects of prime exposure duration on masked identity priming. Behavior Research Methods, 55/1: 151–167.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2012. Mixed-effects models in psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., Hutchison, Keith A., Cortese, Michael J., Kessler, Brett, Loftis,
Bjorn, Neely, James H., Nelson, Douglas L., Simpson, Greg B., Treiman, Rebecca. 2007. The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods 39/3: 445–459. <https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014>.
Balota, David A., Chumbley, James I. 1984. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 10/3: 340–357.
Barca, Laura, Pezzulo, Giovanni. 2012. Unfolding visual lexical decision in time. PLoS One, 7/4: e3593. <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035932>.
Brown, Roger et al. 1987. Letter Substitution in Pseudoword Generation. Linguistic Research Review 5/2: 45–67.
Brysbaert, Marc, Stevens, Michael, Mandera, Paweł, Keuleers, Emmanuel. 2016. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 42. 441–458. <https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000159>.
Brysbaert, Marc, Mandera, Paweł, Keuleers, Emmanuel. 2018. The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current directions in psychological science, 27/1: 45–50.
Brysbaert, Marc, Mandera, Paweł, McCormick, Samantha F., Keuleers, Emmanuel. 2019. Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods 51. 467–479. <https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9>.
Collins, Allan M., Quillian, M. Ross. 1969. Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8/2. 240–247.
Coltheart, Max, Davelaar, Eileen, Jonasson, Jon Torfi, Besner, Derek. 11977, 2022. Access to the internal lexicon. In: S. Dornič (ed.). Attention and performance VI. London: Routledge. 535–555. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003309734>.
Diependaele, Kevin, Lemhöfer, Kristin, Brysbaert, Marc. 2013. The word frequency effect in firstand second-language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 66/5. 843–863.
Dołżycka, Dominika et al. 2022. Evaluating pseudowords: The influence of word class and pseudoword generation method. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51/5. 1027–1045.
Dorffner, Georg, Harris, Catherine L. 1997. When pseudowords become words: Effects of learning on orthographic similarity priming. In: M. G. Shafto, P. Langley (eds.): Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 185–190.
Drummond, Alex. 2007. Ibex Farm: A web-based experiment platform. <https://spellout.net/ibexfarm>.
Duyck, Wouter, Desmet, Timothy, Verbeke, Lieven P. C., Brysbaert, Marc. 2004. WordGen: A tool
for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French. Behavior
Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36/3. 488–499. <https://doi.org/10.3758/
BF03195595>.
Ferrand, Ludovic, New, Boris, Brysbaert, Marc, Keuleers, Emmanuel, Bonin, Patrick, Méot, Alain, Augustinova, Maria, Pallier, Christophe. 2010. The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42/2. 488–496. <https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.488>.
Field, John. 2004. Psycholinguistics: the key concepts. London, New York: Routledge.
Formanowicz, Magdalena et al. 2017. The Influence of Word Formation on Semantic Processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46/1. 31–48.
Fraley, R. Chris, Chong, Jia Y., Baacke, Kyle A., Greco, Anthony J., Guan, Hanxiong, Vazire, Simine. 2022. Journal N-pact factors from 2011 to 2019: evaluating the quality of social/personality journals with respect to sample size and statistical power. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 5/4. 1–17. <https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221120217>.
Gold, Brian T., David K., Powell, Xuan, Liang, Jiang, Yang, Hardy, Peter A. 2007. Speed of lexical decision correlates with diffusion anisotropy in left parietal and frontal white matter: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Neuropsychologia, 45/11. 2439–2446.
Guasch, Marc, Boada, Roger, Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni, Ferré, Pilar. 2022. Prevalence norms for 40,777 Catalan words: An online megastudy of vocabulary size. Behavior Research Methods 55. 3198–3217. <https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01959-5>.
Hartshorne, Joshua K. et al. 2019. The meta-science of adult statistical word segmentation: Part 1. Collabra: Psychology, 5/1.
Imbir, Kamil et al. 2015. The Polish Pseudoword Database. Behavior Research Methods 47/3: 952–965.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press.
Jescheniak, Jörg D., Levelt, Willem J. M. 1994. Word frequency effects in speech production: retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, Memory, and cognition, 20/4. 824–843.
Keuleers, Emmanuel, Brysbaert, Marc. 2010. Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42/3. 627–633. <https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.627>.
König, Peter, Christian K. Friedrich, Gregor Schmid. 2019. Constructing Pseudowords with Constraints on Morphological Features: The Software Tools MorphoWordGen and jMorph. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48/4. 899–913.
Krek, Simon, et al. 2020. Gigafida 2.0: the reference corpus of written standard Slovene. V: N. Calzolari (ur.): LREC 2020: Twelfth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation: May 11-16, 2020, Marseille, France. Paris: ELRA - European Language Resources Association. 3340-3345. <http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2020/LREC-2020.pdf>.
Levelt, Willem. J. M., Roelofs, Ardi., Meyer, Antje S. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22/1. 1–75. < https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776>.
Longtin, Catherine-Marie, Meunier, Fanny. 2005. Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53/1: 26–41. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008>.
Luce, Paul A., Pisoni, David B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19/1. 1–36.
Manouilidou, Christina, Dolenc, Barbara, Marvin, Tatjana, Pirtošek, Zvezdan. 2016. Processing complex pseudo-words in mild cognitive impairment: The interaction of preserved morphological rule knowledge with compromised cognitive ability. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30/1: 49–67. <https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2015.1102970>.
Marjanovič, Katarina, Manouilidou, Christina, Marvin, Tatjana. 2013. Word-formation rules in Slovenian agentive deverbal nominalization: A psycholinguistic study based on pseudo-words. Slovenski jezik / Slovene Linguistic Studies 9. 93–109. <https://hdl.handle.net/1808/11432>.
Marslen-Wilson, William D. 1987. Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25/1–2. 71–102 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9>.
Marslen-Wilson, William, Tyler, Lorraine K., Waksler, Rachelle, Older, Lianne. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological review, 101/1. 3–33. <https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3>.
Matuschek, Hannes, Kliegl, Reinhold, Vasishth, Shravan, Baayen, Harald, Bates, Douglas. 2017. Balancing type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 94. 305–315. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001>.
McRae, Ken, Ferretti, Todd R., Amyote, Liane. 11997, 2010. Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12/2–3. 137–176. <https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386835>. Medler, David A., Binder, Jeffrey R. 2005. Mcword. An on-line orthographic database of the English language. <http://www.neuro.mcw.edu/mcword/>.
Meyer, David E., Schvaneveldt, Roger W. 1971. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90/2. 227–234. <https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031564>.
Morrison, Catriona M., Ellis, Andrew W. 1995. Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 21/1. 116–133.
Oldfield, Richard C., Wingfield, Arthur. 1965. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17/4: 273–281. <https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216508416445>.
Pavlič, Matic, Andreetta, Sara, Stateva, Penka, Stepanov, Arthur. 2022. Vpliv koaktivacije italijanščine kot drugega jezika na fonološko presojanje besedišča v slovenščini kot prvem jeziku. N. Pirih
Svetina, I. Ferbežar (eds.): Na stičišču svetov: slovenščina kot drugi in tuji jezik. Obdobja 41. Ljubljana: Založba Univerze v Ljubljani. 261–270.
Peer, Eyal, Brandimarte, Laura, Samat, Sonam, Acquisti, Alessandro. 2017. Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of experimental social psychology 70: 153–163. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006>.
Perdih, Andrej, Gabrovšek, Dejan, Pavlič, Matic. 2025. Izdelava seznama besed za množično raziskavo razširjenosti slovenskih besed. Slavistična revija, 73/1. 121–138. <https://doi.org/10.57589/srl.v73i1.4231>.
Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 1999. Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22/2. 253–336.
Rastle, Kathleen, Davis, Matthew H., New, Boris. 2004. The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morphoorthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review 11. 1090–1098.
Ratcliff, Roger, Hendrickson, Andrew T. 2021. Do data from mechanical Turk subjects replicate accuracy, response time, and diffusion modeling results? Behavior Research Methods, 53/6. 2302–2325.
Rodd, Jennifer M. 2024. Moving experimental psychology online: How to obtain high quality data when we can’t see our participants. Journal of Memory and Language 134. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2023.104472>.
Roxbury, Tracy, McMahon, Katie, Coulthard, Alan, Copland, David A. 2016. An fMRI study of concreteness effects during spoken word recognition in aging. Preservation or attenuation?. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 7. <https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00240>.
Sassenberg, Kai, Ditrich, Lara. 2019. Research in social psychology changed between 2011 and 2016: Larger sample sizes, more self-report measures, and more online studies. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2/2. 107–114. <https://doi.org/10.1177/251524591983878>.
Seidenberg, Mark S., Waters, Gloria S., Barnes, Marcia A., Tanenhaus, Michael K. 1984. When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 23/3. 383–404. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90270-6>.
Solso, Robert L., Barbuto, Paul F., Juel, Connie L. 1979. Bigram and trigram frequencies and versatilities in the English language. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 11/5. 475–484.
Suen, Ching Y. 1979. N-gram statistics for natural language understanding and text processing. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 2. 164–172. <https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766902>.
Trost, Stefan. 2002. WordCreator. <https://www.sttmedia.com/wordcreator>.
White, Corey N., Ratcliff, Roger, Vasey, Michael W., McKoon, Gail. 2010. Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders. Journal of mathematical psychology, 54/1: 39–52.
Whiting, Charles et al. 2013. The role of phonology in visual word recognition. Psychological Bulletin 139/5: 988–1021. <https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033877>.
Yarkoni, Tal, Balota, David, Yap, Melvin. 2008. Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15/5. 971–979. <https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971>.
Zehr, James, Schwarz, Florian. 2018. PennController for Internet Based Experiments (IBEX). <https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MD832>.
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Avtorji jamčijo, da je delo njihova avtorska stvaritev, da v njem niso kršene avtorske pravice tretjih oseb ali kake druge pravice. V primeru zahtevkov tretjih oseb se avtorji zavezujejo, da bodo varovali interese založnika ter da bodo povrnili morebitno škodo.
Podrobneje v rubriki: Prispevki
