Gibljive meje v Slovenskem Porabju
Zgodba o dveh infrastrukturnih razvojnih projektih
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/Traditio2019480110Ključne besede:
meja, narodni park, krajina, infrastrukturni razvoj, antropocenPovzetek
Nacionalni parki in zavarovana območja so rezultat socialnega prostorjenja; podobno kot v drugih srednje- in vzhodnoevropskih primerih so varovana območja tudi na madžarsko-slovenski meji. Na podlagi zgodbe o dveh razvojnih infrastrukturnih projektih na tem območju avtor trdi, da so lokalne ekologije in meje same po sebi družbenonaravne stvaritve.
Prenosi
Literatura
Amilhat Szary, Anne-Laure. 2015. Boundaries and Borders. In: John Agnew et al. (eds.), Handbook of Political Geography. London: Wiley-Blackwell, 13–25.
Andreychouk, Viacheslav. 2015. Cultural Landscape Functions. In: M. Luc et al. (eds.), Landscape Analysis and Planning: Geographical Perspectives. Heidelberg et al.: Springer, 3–20.
Arias-Maldonado, Manuel. 2015. Environment and Society Socionatural Relations in the Anthropocene. London: Springer.
Balázs Pál. 2017. Az őrségi táj változásának és karakterének elemzése. PhD Dissertation. University of Sopron.
Baranyai, Olga. 2012. A változó Őrség fejlesztésének természeti és társadalmi alapjai. PhD Dissertation. University of Pécs.
Barth, Fredrik. 1961. Nomads of South Persia. Oslo: Oslo University Press.
Barth, Fredrik. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Biermann, Frank et al. 2016. Down to Earth: Contextualizing the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 39: 341–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.004
Boscoboinik, Andrea. 2014. And the Farmer Became a Gardener: Methodological Challenges of Anthropological Research in the Swiss Alps. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica. 49: 29–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2014.12
Bucher, Gudrun. 2002. “Von Beschreibung der Sitten und Gebräuche der Völcker”: Die Instruktionen Gerhard Friedrich Müllers und ihre Bedeutung für die Geschichte der Ethnologie und der Geschichtswissenschaft. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Cadenasso, Mary L. et al. 2003. A Framework for a Theory of Ecological Boundaries. BioScience 53: 750–758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0750:AFFATO]2.0.CO;2
Candea, Matei. 2018. Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carneiro, Robert L. 2003. Evolutionism in Culture: A Critical History. Boulder: Westview Press.
Cole, John W., and Eric R. Wolf. 1974. The Hidden Frontier: Ecology and Ethnicity in an Alpine Valley. New York: Academic Press.
Cosgrove, Denis. 1984. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. London: Croom Helm.
Cosgrove, Denis. 2008. Geography and Vision: Seeing, Imagining and Representing the World. London: Tauris.
Cosgrove, Denis, and Stephen Daniels. 1988. Introduction: Iconography and Landscape. In: Denis Cosgrove and Stephen Daniels (eds.), The Iconography of Landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–10.
Csapó, Olga. 2008. Az Őrség területi elhatárolási problémái. Földrajzi Értesítő 57 (3–4): 313–333.
Denisiuk, Zygmun, Stepan Stoyko, and Jan Terray. 1997. Experience in Cross-border Cooperation for National Park and Protected Areas in Central Europe. In: James Gordon Nelson and Rafal Serafin (eds.), National Parks and Protected Areas: Keystones to Conservation and Sustainable Development. Berlin: Springer, 145–150.
Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Dijksterhuis, Fokko Jan. 2012. The Mutual Making of Sciences and Humanities: Willebrord Snellius, Jacob Golius and the Early Modern Entanglement of Mathematics and Philology. In: Rens Bod, Jaap Maat and Thijs Weststeijn (eds.), The Making of the Humanities: Volume II: From Early Modern to Modern Disciplines. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 73–92.
Dömötör, Sándor. 1960. Az Őrség. Budapest: Gondolat.
Ember, Melvin. 1997. Evolution of the Human Relations Area Files. Cross-Cultural Research 31: 3–15.
Fall, Juliet. 2005. Drawing the Line: Nature, Hybridity and Politics in Transboundary Spaces. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Fikfak, Jurij, and Tatiana Bajuk Senčar. 2015. Triglav National Park: Actors, Strategies, Problems, Solutions. Traditiones 44 (1): 7–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/Traditio2015440101
Flynn, Donna K. 2008. “We Are the Border”: Identity, Exchange, and the State along the Bénin-Nigeria Border. American Ethnologist 24 (2): 311–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1997.24.2.311
Gupta, Akhil, and James Ferguson. 1997. Culture, Power, Place: Ethnography at the End of an Era. In: Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson (eds.), Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1–32.
Hann, Chris. 2004. The Cartography of Copyright Cultures Versus the Proliferation of Public Properties. In: Erich Kasten (ed.), Properties of Culture – Culture as Property. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag, 289–304.
van Houtum, Henk, and Ton van Naerssen. 2002. Bordering, Ordering and Othering. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 93 (2): 125–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00189
Ingold, Tim. 1993. The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology 25 (2): 152–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235
Ispán, Ágota Lídia et al. 2018. Complex Ethnographic Research Methods for the Study of Protected Areas and Border Communities at the Slovenian-Hungarian Border. Acta Ethnographica Hungarica 63 (2): 471–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/022.2018.63.2.12
Knippenberg, Hans, and Jan Markusse. 1999. 19th and 20th Century Borders and Border Regions in Europe: Some Reflections. In: Hans Knippenberg and Jan Markusse (eds.), Nationalising and Denationalising European Border Regions, 1800–2000: Views from Geography and History. Dodrecht: Springer, 1–21.
Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kopytoff, Igor. 1987. The Internal African Frontier: The Making of African Political Culture. In: Igor Kopytoff (ed.), The African Frontier: The Reproduction of Traditional African Societies. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 3–84.
Kossits, József. 1828. A Magyar Országi Vendus Tótokról. Tudományos: Gyűjtemény 5.
Kozorog, Miha. 2019. “They Feed Here and Live There”: Borderwork with Wildlife in Slovenia’s North-East Corner. Traditiones 48 (1): 191–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/Traditio2019480108
Lamont, Michèle, and Virág Molnár. 2002. The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
Lederman, Rena. 1998. Globalization and the Future of Culture Areas: Melanesianist Anthropology in Transition. Annual Review of Anthropology 27 (1): 427–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.427
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1982. The Way of the Masks. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Linde-Laursen, Anders. 2010. Bordering: Identity Processes between the National and Personal. Farhnam: Ashgate.
Lovell, Nadia (ed.). 1998. Locality and Belonging. London: Routledge.
Low, Setha M. 2009. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Space and Place. Semiotica 175: 21–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2009.041
Löwis, Sabine. 2015. Phantom Borders in the Political Geography of East Central Europe: An Introduction. Erdkunde 69: 99–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2015.02.01
Mitchell, William, and John Thomas. 1994. Imperial Landscape. In: John William and Thomas Mitchell (eds.), Landscape and Power. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 5–34.
Moore, Amelia. 2015. Anthropocene Anthropology: Reconceptualizing Contemporary Global Change. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 22 (1): 27–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12332
Mukicsné Kozár, Mária. 1999. A magyarországi szlovének: Letelepedésük, múltjuk, jelenük. Vasi szemle 53 (4): 492–510.
Mukicsné Kozár, Mária. 2003. A magyarországi szlovének. Budapest: Press Publica.
Munda Hirnök, Katalin. 2013. Represija nad Slovenci v Porabju v času Rákosijevega režima (1948–1956). Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino 53 (1): 201–212.
Murcia, Carolina. 1995. Edge Effects in Fragmented Forests: Implications for Conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10 (2): 58–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88977-6
Murdock, George. 1949. Social Structure. New York: MacMillan.
Needham, Rodney. 1975. Polythetic Classification: Convergence and Consequences. Man (N. S.) 10 (3): 349–369.
Nemesnépi, Zakál György. 1985 [1818]. Eőrséghnek Leírása. Szombathely: Őrségi Baráti Kör.
Purdy, Jedediah. 2015. After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rytter, Mikkel, and Karen Fog Olwig (eds.). 2011. Mobile Bodies, Mobile Souls: Family, Religion and Migration in a Global World. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Sahlins, Marshall. 2012. What Kinship is: And What it is Not. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Sahlins, Peter. 1989. Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Santini, Carlotta. 2018. Can Humanity be Mapped? Adolf Bastian, Friedrich Ratzel and the Cartography of Culture. History of Anthropology Newsletter 42. https://histanthro.org/notes/can-humanity-be-mapped/
Sauer, Carl Ortwin. 1963. Land and Life: A Selection from the Writings of Carl Ortwin Sauer. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Scott, James W. 2018. Globalization and Border Studies. In: Robert C. Kloosterman, Virginie Mamadouh and Pieter Terhorst (eds.), Handbook on the Geographies of Globalization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 62–82.
Thomas, Keith. 1984. Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England 1500-1800. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Tilley, Christopher, and Kate Cameron-Daum. 2017. An Anthropology of Landscape: The Extraordinary in the Ordinary. London: UCL Press.
Vermeulen, Han. 2008. Early History of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German Enlightenment: Anthropological Discourse in Europe and Asia, 1710-1808. PhD Dissertation. University of Leiden.
Więckowski, Marek. 2018. Political Borders under Ecological Control in the Polish Borderland. Geographia Polonica 91 (1): 127–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0105
Wiens, John A. 1995. Landscape Mosaics and Ecological Theory. In: Hansson Lennart, Lenore Fahrig and G. W. Merriam (eds.), Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes. London: Chapman and Hall, 1–26.
Wilson, Thomas M., and Hastings Donnan (eds.). 1998. Border Identities: Nation and State at International Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yarrow, M. M., and V. H. Marin. 2007. Toward Conceptual Cohesiveness: A Historical Analysis of the Theory and Utility of Ecological Boundaries and Transition Zones. Ecosystems 10: 462–476.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorji jamčijo, da je delo njihova avtorska stvaritev, da v njem niso kršene avtorske pravice tretjih oseb ali kake druge pravice. V primeru zahtevkov tretjih oseb se avtorji zavezujejo, da bodo varovali interese založnika ter da bodo povrnili morebitno škodo.
Podrobneje v rubriki: Prispevki
