Bodies, Biopolitical Critique, and Female Agency in Contemporary Bio(medical) Artworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/ahas.30.1.07Keywords:
bioart, human cells, medical art, body, female contemporary artists, HeLa cells, posthuman feminism, gender studiesAbstract
The paper investigates the societal and critical potential of bio(medical) artistic practices by focusing on the ways in which female artists use bodies and living cells as means of biopolitical critique. Using an ecofeminist and posthuman feminist theoretical framework, the author discusses selected bio(medical) works by female contemporary artists that contain living human cells or in which they connect with other species. The paper shows how these works are critical towards many socio-historical and biopolitical issues, such as discrimination associated with blood and blood lineages, the killing of indigenous communities, ecocide, biobanks, racial and gender-based superiority and dominance, human authority over other-than human and more-than-human beings. Such artistic practices are of great relevance for gender studies and studies of artistic research in bioculture and technoscience, where their interdisciplinary nature changes the representation and understanding of bodies in the arts and everyday culture.
Downloads
References
Bäumel, Sonja. Expanded Self (2012). Accessed April 17, 2025, https://www.sonjabaeumel.at/work/expanded+self/.
Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128
Barad, Karen. “Living in a Posthumanist Material World: Lessons from Schrödinger’s Cat.” In Bits of Life: Feminism at the Intersections of Media, Bioscience, and Technology, edited by Anneke Smelik and Nina Lykke, 165–76. Washington: University of Washington Press, 2008.
Battista, Kathy. Renegotiating the Body: Feminist Art in 1970s London. London and New York: I.B.Tauris, 2013.
Best, Susan. It’s Not Personal: Post 60s Body Art and Performance. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021.
Blood Wars - Vampire Study Group. Accessed September 3, 2025, https://vampirestudygroup.com/bloodwars/.
Braidotti, Rosi. “The Politics of Life as Bios/Zoe.” In Bits of Life: Feminism at the Intersections of Media, Bioscience, and Technology, edited by Anneke Smelik and Nina Lykke, 177–92. Washington: University of Washington Press, 2008.
Braidotti, Rosi. Posthuman Feminism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2022.
Byerley, Anne, and Derrick Chong. “Biotech Aesthetics: Exploring the Practice of Bio Art.” Culture and Organization 21, No. 3 (2015): 197–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2013.836
Catts, Oron, and Ionat Zurr. “Semi-Living Art.” In Signs of life: Bio art and beyond, edited by Eduardo Kac, 131–48. Cambridge-Massachusetts-London: The MIT Press, 2006.
Conant, Chrissy. Chrissy Caviar ® (2001). Accessed April 6, 2025, https://www.chrissyconant.com/chrissy-caviar.
Dumitriu, Anna, and Alex May. Super-organism (2014). Accessed April 17, 2025, https://annadumitriu.co.uk/portfolio/super-organism-series/.
Dumit, Joseph. “Foreword: Biological Feedback.” In Tactical Biopolitics – Art, Activism, and Technoscience, edited by Beatriz da Costa and Kavita Philip, xi–xv. Massachusetts: Institute of Technology, 2008.
Farber, Leora. “The Scientific Lab as Studio / The Studio as Scientific Lab: Exploring Practice-Led Microbial Bioart in a Decolonial Context.” In How does Artistic Research Transform Pedagogy and Art Practice in Africa, edited by Christo Doherty, 180–90. Johannesburg: Arts Research Africa, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54223/10539/35903
González Valerio, María Antonia, and Polona Tratnik. Through the Scope of Life: Art and (Bio) Technologies Philosophically Revisited. Cham: Springer, 2023.
Haraway, Donna J. When Species Meet. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press, 2008.
Hauser, Jens. “Some Survive, Few Are Conserved, Even Fewer Can Travel: Paradoxes and Obstacles in Maintaining and Staging Biomedia Art.” In Living Matter: The Preservation of Biological Materials in Contemporary Art, edited by Rachel Rivenc and Kendra Roth, 74–83. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute, 2022.
Hunter, WhiteFeather Christie. “The Witch in the Lab Coat—Doubling, Doubling, Toiling and Troubling the Narratives and Methodologies of Standard Scientific Research Practices.” PhD diss., University of Western Australia, 2023.
Johung, Jennifer. Vital Forms: Biological Art, Architecture, and the Dependencies of Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2019.
Millett-Gallant, Ann. The Disabled Body in Contemporary Art. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
Newman, Emily L. Female Body Image in Contemporary Art: Dieting, Eating Disorders, Self-Harm, and Fatness. New York-London: Routledge, 2018.
Rijsingen, Miriam van. “Framing Interiority: Portraits in the Age of Genomics.” In The Body Within: Art, Medicine and Visualization, edited by Renée van de Vall and Robert Zwijnenberg, 187–205. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2009.
Rijsingen, Miriam van. “Insights and dividing lines: The medical-anatomical body in contemporary art.” Život umjetnosti 70 (2003): 112–16.
Schubert, Theresa. mEat Me (2020). Accessed April 9, 2025, https://www.theresaschubert.com/works/meat-me/.
Sliwinska, Basia, ed. Feminist Visual Activism and the Body. New York-London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.
Smrekar, Maja. I Hunt Nature and Culture Hunts Me (2014). Accessed April 6, 2025, https://www.majasmrekar.org/k9-topology-i-hunt-nature-and-culture-hunts-me.
Smrekar, Maja. Hybrid Family (2016). Accessed April 6, 2025, https://www.majasmrekar.org/k-9topology-hybrid-family.
Wołodźko, Agnieszka Anna. Affect as Contamination: Embodiment in Bioart and Biotechnology. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2023.
Yetisen, Ali, Joe Davis, Ahmet Coskun, George Church and Seok Hyun Yun. “Bioart.” Trends in Biotechnology 33, No. 12 (2015): 724–34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.011
Zurr, Ionat, and Oron Catts. Tissues, Cultures, Art. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
