Skupnostni razvoj: lokalna priseljenska partnerstva v Kanadi in implikacije za Slovenijo

Avtorji

  • Mitja Durnik University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Ljubljana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.5136

Ključne besede:

geografija, skupnost, razvoj, priseljenci, integracija, Kanada, Slovenija

Povzetek

Kanada je zaradi svojih socialno-ekonomskih prednosti ciljna država za številne begunce in priseljence. Avtor v članku ocenjuje kanadsko prakso naseljevanja priseljencev s stališča skupnostnega razvoja. V ospredju je predstavitev uspešne kanadske politike priseljevanja in njenega učinka na lokalni ravni z uporabo modela lokalnih integracijskih partnerstev. Nasprotno pa je do sedaj Slovenija uveljavljala t.i. restriktivni model integracije priseljencev, pri čemer ni upoštevala potenciala lokalnih skupnosti pri reševanju te kompleksne problematike. V prispevku smo potrdili, da je Kanada zaradi institucionaliziranega večstopenjskega partnerstva uspešnejša v integraciji priseljencev kot Slovenija. V obeh državah je integracija priseljencev v zdravstveni sistem najbolj akuten problem. Za namen raziskave smo uporabili kombiniran pristop, kjer smo izvedli intervjuje in primerjali nekatere kazalce integracije priseljencev. Kanada glede na večino integracijskih parametrov kaže bistveno boljše rezultate kot Slovenija.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Anisef, P., Lanphier, M. 2003: The world in a city. Toronto.

Botrić, V. 2016: Attitudes towards immigrants, immigration policies and labour market outcomes: Comparing Croatia with Hungary and Slovenia. Croatian International Relations Review 22-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2016-0004

Bradshaw, T. K. 2008: The post-place community: Contributions to the debate about the definition of community. Community Development 39-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330809489738

Chen, Y.-Y., Ku, Y.-W. 2017: Community practice at a crossroad: the approaches and challenges in Taiwan. Community Development Journal 52-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsw046

Gibson, R., Bucklaschuk, J., Annis, R. C. 2017: Working together: Collaborative response to welcoming newcomers in Brandon, Manitoba. Canadian perspectives on immigration in small cities. Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40424-0_3

Hardcastle, D. A., Powers, P. R., Wenocur, S. 2011: Community practice: Theories and skills for social workers. New York.

Hou, F. 2005: Recent immigrants and the formation of visible minority neighbourhoods in Canada’s large cities. Analyitical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 221.

How inclusive is my city? 2019. Internet: https://my.citiesofmigration.org/ (3. 8. 2018).

Huddleston, T., Bilgili, Ö., Joki, A.-L., Vankova, Z. 2015: Migrant integration policy index 2015. Barcelona. Internet: http://mipex.eu/sites/default/files/downloads/files/mipex-2015-book-a5.pdf (25. 4. 2018).

Kivisto, P., Faist, T. 2009: Beyond a Border: The Causes and Consequences of Contemporary Immigration. Thousand Oaks.

Kobayashi, A., Ratnayake, A., Newbold, B., Nicholson, C., Andrew, C., Zinga, D., Hagar, D., Acara, E., Taraky, H., Dam, H., Nadeau, J., Rocheleau, J., Pottie, K., Manning, L. M., Tossutti, L., Casagrande, M., Gordon, M., Paquet, M., Rothstein, M., Brisson, N., Cliff-Jungling, S., Satzewich, V., Esses, V. 2012: Analysis of LIP strategic plans: Promising practices. Welcoming community’s initiative. Internet: http://p2pcanada.ca/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2013/05/The-Analysis-of-LIP-Strategic-Plans-Promising-Practices.pdf (8. 5. 2018).

Kozina, J., Clifton, N. 2019: City-region or urban-rural framework: what matters more in understanding the residential location of the creative class? Acta geographica Slovenica 59-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.5137

Kozina, J., Poljak Istenič, S., Komac, B: 2019: Green creative environments: Contribution to sustainable urban and regional development. Acta geographica Slovenica 59-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.7030

Local Immigration Partnerships: Outcomes 2008-2013, 2014: Internet: http://p2pcanada.ca/files/2014/07/Local-Immigration-Partnerships-Outcomes-2008-2013.pdf (3. 4. 2018).

Ma, M. C. K. 2017: Local immigration partnerships. How is Peterborough engaged with immigrant integration? Canadian perspectives on immigration in small Cities. Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40424-0_4

Medvešek, M., Bešter, R. 2010: Državljani tretjih držav ali tretjerazredni državljani? Integracija državljanov tretjih držav v Sloveniji. Ljubljana.

Murdie, R., Gosh, S. 2010: Does spatial concentration always mean a lack of integration? Exploring ethnic concentration and integration in Toronto. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830903387410

Pajnik, M. 2007: Integration policies in migration: Between nationalising states and transnational citizenship, with reference to the Slovenian case. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830701359298

Pero, P. R. 2017: The new local governance of immigration in Canada: Local immigration partnerships and their role in immigrant settlement and integration in small- and medium-sized Ontarian cities. Ph.D. thesis, Queen’s University. Kingston.

Rijavec, D., Pevcin, P. 2018: An examination and evaluation of multilevel governance during migration crisis. The case of Slovenia. Central European Public Administration Review 16-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.v16i1.359

Rothman, J. 1996: The Interweaving of community intervention approaches. Journal of Community practise 3, 3-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v03n03_03

Rothman, J. 2007: Multi modes of intervention at the macro level. Journal of Community Practice 15-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v15n04_02

Segovia, Gomez, A. 2011: Spatial research study of Peruvian immigrants in Santiago de Chile. Acta geographica Slovenica 51-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS51109

Sturdy, S. C. H. 2014: From government to governance: The city of Toronto’s role in immigrant settlement service coordination since the Canada-Ontario Immigration Agreement. MA Thesis, Simon Fraser University. Burnaby.

The North York East Local Immigration Partnership: Strategic plan and report, 2013: Internet: http://torontonorthlip.ca/sites/torontonorthlip.ca/files/northyork_report.pdf (6. 7. 2019).

Tibe Bonifacio, G., Drolet, J. L. 2016: Canadian perspectives on immigration in small cities. Cham.

Vintar Mally, K. 2018: Regional differences in Slovenia from the viewpoint of achieving Europe’s sustainable development. Acta geographica Slovenica 58-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.3309

Vipond, R. 2017: Making a global city: How one Toronto school embraced diversity. Toronto.

Vižintin, M. A. 2017: Medkulturna vzgoja in izobraževanje: vključevanje otrok priseljencev. Ljubljana.

Waters, M. C., Gerstein Pineau, G. 2016: The integration of immigrants into American society. Panel on the Integration into American society. Washington. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/21746

Maple leaf, the Canadian national symbol

Objavljeno

2020-05-26

Kako citirati

Durnik, M. 2020: Skupnostni razvoj: lokalna priseljenska partnerstva v Kanadi in implikacije za Slovenijo. Acta geographica Slovenica 60-1. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.5136

Številka

Rubrike

Articles