The importance of green amenities for small creative actors in Tokyo: Comparing natural and sociocultural spatial attraction characteristics

Matjaž Uršič; Kazushi Tamano

doi:10.3986/AGS.4710

Avtorji

Matjaž Uršič Assistant Professor, Research Scientist Associate
Kazushi Tamano Professor, Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.4710

Ključne besede:

faktorji prostorske privlačnosti, naravne dobrine, zelene dobrine, kreativni sektorji, kreativni ekosistem, mali kreativni akterji, Tokio

Povzetek

V zadnjem desetletju so japonske oblasti vložile veliko truda in ekonomskih virov v izdelavo razvojnih modelov, ki bi pomagali zgraditi prijaznejše okolje za domačo kreativno ekonomijo. Ta prizadevanja so zaradi specifičnih naravnih in družbeno-kulturnih značilnosti Tokija različno vplivala na majhne ustvarjalne skupine. Na podlagi analize faktorjev prostorske privlačnosti za posameznike iz različnih kreativnih poklicev smo v članku ugotovili, kako pomembne so zelene, tj. naravne dobrine v primerjavi z drugimisocialno-kulturnimi značilnostmi, ko gre za majhne ustvarjalne skupine. Analiza podatkov, pridobljenih prek polstrukturiranih intervjujev, razkriva, da zelene dobrine nimajo primarne vloge za prostorsko distribucijo majhnih kreativnih skupin, vendar imajo zelo pomembno sekundarno vlogo v primerih, ko kreativni delavci primerjajo podobne značilnosti prostorske privlačnosti na določenih območjih Tokija.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Biografije avtorja

Matjaž Uršič, Assistant Professor, Research Scientist Associate

Sociology

Kazushi Tamano, Professor, Researcher

Tokyo Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Humanities, Department of Behavioral Social Sciences

Literatura

ACRE 2010. Accommodating creative knowledge – competitiveness of European metropolitan regions within the enlarged Union - Published reports. Internet: http://www.acre.socsci.uva.nl/results/reports.html (15. 5. 2015).

Alfken, C., Broekel, T., Sternberg, R. 2015: Factors explaining the spatial agglomeration of the creative class: empirical evidence for German artists. European Planning Studies 23-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.979767

Atkinson, R., Flint, J. 2004: Snowball Sampling. Encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks.

Bell, D., Jayne, M. 2004: City of quarters: urban villages in the contemporary city. London.

Bole, D. 2008: Cultural industry as a result of new city tertiarization. Acta geographica Slovenica 48-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS48202

Chapain, C., Clifton, N., Comunian, R. 2013: Understanding creative regions: bridging the gap between global discourses and regional and national contexts. Regional Studies 47-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.746441

Clifton, N., Cooke, P., Hansen, H. K. 2013: Towards a reconciliation of the ‘context-less’ with the ‘space-less’? The creative class across varieties of capitalism: New evidence from Sweden and the UK. Regional Studies 47-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.665991

Clifton, N., Kozina, J. 2015: Identifying the locational factors of the creative class: temporal and spatial implications. Lecture at the University of Oxford, 20. 8. 2015. Oxford.

DeNatale, D., Wassall, G. H. 2006: Creative economy research in New England: A reexamination. Boston.

Florida, R. 2005: Cities and the creative class. New York.

Florida, R. 2010: The Great reset: how new ways of living and working drive post-crash prosperity. New York.

Fujita, K., Hill, R. C. 2005: Innovative Tokyo. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3507. Internet: https://www.msu.edu/user/hillrr/InnovativeTokyo%20Text.pdf (16. 8. 2015).

Giddens, A. 1984: The constitution of society – outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge.

Gielen, P. 2013: Creativity and other fundamentalisms. Santa Monica.

Godina, V. 2015: Zablode postsocializma. Ljubljana.

Gottlieb, P. 1994: Amenities as an economic development tool: is there enough evidence? Economic development quarterly 8-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124249400800304

Goto, K. 2014: Creative Sangyo no Sangyososhiki to Seisakukadai. Nihon Seisaku Kinyu Koko Ronshu 22-2.

Hall, P., Soskice, D. 2001: Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford

Hanzawa, S. 2009: Nippon no Sozosangyoshuseki. Creative city and social inclusion. Tokyo.

Huggins, R., Clifton, N. 2011: Competitiveness, creativity, and place-based development. Environment and Planning A 43-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a43559

Karatsu, H. 2001: Small and medium-sized enterprise in Japan. Journal of Japanese Trade and Industry. Internet: http://www.jef.or/jp/en/jti/200111_009.html (5. 6. 2010).

Kenkyujo, N. S. 2015: Nen Project Team 2007. Tokyo.

Kim, C. 2015: Locating creative city policy in East Asia: neoliberalism, developmental state and assemblage of East Asian cities. International Journal of Cultural Policy 23-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1048242

Kobayashi, Y. 2015: The need for ‘Rebuilding Tokyo’ with the 2020 Tokyo Olympics as Impetus. Tokyo.

Kon, K. 2010: Chiiki niokeru Chushokigyo no Hattensenryaku - Osaka Shiritsu Daigaku Daigakuin Sozotoshi Kenkyujo/Development Strategy of small and medium sized companies in regional areas - Creative Spaces and Urban Regeneration. Kyoto.

Kozina, J. 2016: Demographic characteristics of creative workers: under-activated development potentials in Slovenia? Acta geographica Slovenica 57-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.4602

Krätke, S. 2011: The Creative capital of cities: interactive knowledge creation and the urbanization economies of innovation. Chichester.

Machimura, T. 1997: Building a capital for emperor and enterprise: the changing urban meaning of Central Tokyo. Culture and the City in East Asia. Oxford.

Markusen, A. 2006: Urban development and the politics of a creative class: evidence from the study of artists. Environment and Planning A 38-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a38179

Markusen, A., Wassall, G. H., DeNatale, D., Cohen, R. 2008: Defining the creative economy: industry and occupational approaches. Economic Development Quaterly 22-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242407311862

Martin-Brelot, H., Grossetti, M., Eckert, D., Gritsai, O., Kovács, Z. 2010: The spatial mobility of the ‘Creative Class’: A European perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00960.x

Miyazaki, T. 2008: Garapagosuka suru Nippon no Seizogyo. Tokyo.

Morgan, D. L. 2008: The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. New York.

Moreno-Peñaranda, R. 2011: Japan’s urban agriculture: Cultivating sustainability and well-being. Our world, United Nations University. Internet: https://ourworld.unu.edu/en/japans-urban-agriculture-cultivating-sustainability-and-wellbeing (7. 9. 2016).

Murphy, E., Redmont, D. 2008: Location factors of creative knowledge companies in the Dublin Region The managers’ view. Amsterdam.

Musterd, S., Murie, A. 2010: Making competitive cities. Oxford.

Musterd, S., Gritsai, O. 2012: The creative knowledge city in Europe: Structural conditions and urban policy strategies for competitive cities. European Urban and Regional Studies 20-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412439199

Møller, J. 2008: Villages in Landscapes – the importance of appearance. Annual conference, Nordic-Scottish University for Rural and Regional Development. Copenhagen.

Nemet, G. F. 2009: Demand pull, technology push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy 38-5.

Pain, K., Van Hamme, G., Vinciguerra, S., Quentin, D. 2015: Global networks, cities and economic performance: Observations from an analysis of cities in Europe and the USA. Urban Studies 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015577303

Poljak Istenič, S. 2016: Reviving Public Spaces through Cycling and Gardening. Ljubljana – European Green Capital 2016. Etnološka tribina 39-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15378/1848-9540.2016.39.06

Rausch, S., Negray, C. 2006: Does the creative engine run? A consideration of the effect of creative class on economic strength and growth. Journal of Urban Affairs 28-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2006.00310.x

Ravbar, M., Bole, D., Nared, J. 2005: A creative milieu and the role of geography in studying the competitiveness of cities: the case of Ljubljana. Acta geographica Slovenica 45-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS45201

Ravbar, M. 2011: Creative social groups in Slovenia: Contribution to geographic studying of human resources. Acta Geographica Slovenica 51-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS51204

Rivas, M. 2011: From creative industries to the creative place refreshing the local development agenda in small and medium-sized towns. Internet: http://www2.cetiqt.senai.br/ead/redige/index.php/redige/article/view/112/170 (10. 9. 2015).

Sasaki, M. 2003: Sozosangyo ni yoru Toshikeizai no Saisei. Kikan Keizai Kenkyu 26-2.

Sassen, S. 2001: The Global city, New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton.

Scott, A. J. 2006: Creative cities: Conceptual issues and policy questions. Journal of Urban Affairs 28-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0735-2166.2006.00256.x

Tevfik, N. 1996: Cost-benefit analysis, theory and application. Thousand Oaks.

Tokyo Metropolitan Government 2014: Tokyo-to Choki Vision. Tokyo.

Tokyo Metropolitan Government Bureau of Urban Development 2013. Tokyo no Kokusaikyosoryoku no isso no kyoka ni muketa Toshisaisei no Suishin. Tokyo.

Voicu, M. C. 2011: Using the snowball method in marketing research on hidden populations. Challenges of the Knowledge Society 1.

Yoshimoto, M. 2009: Creative Sangyo no Choryu 2. Nissei Kisoken REPORT (August 2009).

WCCF World Cities Culture Forum 2012, 2015: World cities culture report. London.