Skupno, skupnostne prakse in pokrajine: kratek uvod

Avtorji

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.13206

Ključne besede:

trajnostno upravljanje, gospodarjenje, pokrajina, naravni viri, alternativni pristopi, skupno, kolektivni ukrepi

Povzetek

Zaradi rasti prebivalstva na globalni ravni, vse bolj intenzivnega kmetijstva, praznjenja obrobnih in za življenje manj ugodnih območij ter naraščajočih selitev s podeželja v mesta sta vse bolj izrazita dva nasprotujoča si trenda: opuščanje zemljišč na eni strani in povečanje intenzivnosti kmetijstva na drugi strani. Upoštevajoč kompleksnost omenjenih problemov, ki vodijo v siromašenje pokrajine, izgubo biotske raznovrstnosti in upadanje bistvenih ekosistemskih storitev, je jasno, da sta trajnostno upravljanje ter gospodarjenje s pokrajinami in naravnimi viri nujna. Za reševanje omenjenih izzivov so potrebni alternativni pristopi. V tej posebni številki se osredotočamo na možnosti, ki jih nudijo skupno in skupnostne prakse pri trajnostnem upravljanju pokrajin in naravnih virov. Izraz »skupno« se nanaša na način, kako skupnosti družno upravljajo z lokalnimi viri. Kolektivni ukrepi pa se nanašajo na usklajena prizadevanja in sodelovanje skupnosti.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. 2013: Sustaining the Commons. Tempe.

Bogataj, N., Krč., J. 2023: Towards the efficient response of forest owners to large-scale forest damage: An example of forest commons. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11084

Dowding, K. 2013: Collective action problem. Encyclopedia Britannica. Internet: https://www.britannica.com/topic/collective-action-problem-1917157 (20. 1. 2021).

Hashimoto, S., Dasgupta, R., Kabaya, K., Matsui, T., Haga, C., Saito, O., Takeuchi, K. 2018: Scenario analysis of land-use and ecosystem services of social-ecological landscapes: Implications of alternative development pathways under declining population in the Noto Peninsula, Japan. Sustainability Science 14-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0626-6

Hirokawa, Y. 2013: The exploration of a new commons adapted to modern society. Commons & Public Space. Kyoto.

Klein, J., Tucker, C. M., Steger, C., Nolin, A., Reid, R., Hopping, K., Yeh, E., et al. 2019: An integrated community and ecosystem-based approach to disaster risk reduction in mountain systems. Environmental Science & Policy 94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2018.12.034

Laerhoven, F. 2010: Governing community forests and the challenge of solving two-level collective action dilemmas—A large-N perspective. Global Environmental Change 20-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2010.04.005

Landis, D. 2017: Designing agricultural landscapes for biodiversity-based ecosystem services. Basic and Applied Ecology 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAAE.2016.07.005

Martin, P., Williams, J. 2016: Next generation rural natural resource governance: A careful diagnosis. Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development. Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26021-1_30

McKean, M. A. 2000: Common property: What is it, what is it good for, and what makes it work? People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance. Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5286.003.0008

Nogueira, J., Araújo, J. P., Mamede Alonso, J., Simões, S. 2023: Common lands, landscape management and rural development: A case study in a mountain village in northwest Portugal. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11081

Ombogoh, D., Tanui, J., McMullin, S., Muriuki, J., Mowo, J. 2018: Enhancing adaptation to climate variability in the East African highlands: a case for fostering collective action among smallholder farmers in Kenya and Uganda. Climate and Development 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2016.1174665

Palšová, L., Machničová, Z. 2023: Common lands as a system of joint management to contribute to community resilience? Case from Slovakia. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11102

Pipan, P., Šmid Hribar M., Urbanc, M. 2023: Motivation, robustness and benefits of water commons: Insights from small drinking water supply systems. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11592

Renes, H., Kruse, A., Potthoff, K. 2023: Transhumance, commons, and new opportunities: A European perspective. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11097

Ribeiro, D., Šmid Hribar, M. 2019: Assessment of land-use changes and their impacts on ecosystem services in two Slovenian rural landscapes. Acta geographica Slovenica 59-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.6636

Šmid Hribar, M., Bole, D., Urbanc, M. 2015: Public and common goods in the cultural landscape. Geografski vestnik 87-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/gv87203

Šmid Hribar, M., Hori, K., Urbanc, M., Saito, O., Zorn, M. 2023: Evolution and new potentials of landscape commons: insights from Japan and Slovenia. Ecosystem Services 59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101499

Šmid Hribar, M., Urbanc, M., Zorn, M. 2023: Commons and their contribution to sustaining Slovenian cultural landscapes. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11591

Šumrada, T., Erjavec, E. 2023: Will farmers collaborate to conserve biodiversity? The use of collective bonus in the High Nature Value farmland in Slovenia. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11015

Tucker, C. M., Šmid Hribar, M., Urbanc, M., Bogataj, N., Gunya, A., Rodela, R., Sigura, M., Piani, L. 2023: Governance of interdependent ecosystem services and common-pool resources. Land Use Policy 127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106575

Williams, B., Grantham, H., Watson, J., Alvarez, S., Simmonds, J., Rogéliz, C., Silva, M., et al. 2020: Minimising the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in an intact landscape under risk of rapid agricultural development. Environmental Research Letters 15-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ff7

Objavljeno

2023-10-20

Kako citirati

Urbanc, M., Hori, K., & Šmid Hribar, M. (2023). Skupno, skupnostne prakse in pokrajine: kratek uvod. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 63(3), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.13206