Unveiling the cultural ecosystem services of urban green spaces: A case study of Ljubljana, Slovenia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.13788

Keywords:

urban green space, recreation, cultural ecosystem services, quality of life, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Abstract

This paper analyses the value of cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces. A field survey of 900 respondents in Ljubljana, Slovenia, examined cultural ecosystem services in seven types of urban green spaces and compared the results with two types of non-green public spaces (old town, shopping mall). Differences between the types were assessed using one-way variance analysis (ANOVA). Results showed statistically significant differences between the types, with sports facilities standing out as valuable for recreation and education. The old town's cultural heritage and aesthetics were highly valued, while shopping malls ranked lowest. The study emphasises the importance of urban green spaces for quality of life of residents and informs land use planning decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agbenyega, O., Burgess, P. J., Cook, M., Morris, J. 2009: Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands. Land Use Policy 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011

Albrecht, C-M., Hattula, S., Lehmann, D. R. 2017: The relationship between consumer shopping stress and purchase abandonment in task-oriented and recreation-oriented consumers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 45-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0514-5

Antrop, M. 2004: Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 67-1,4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4

Bäckström, K. 2006: Understanding recreational shopping: A new approach. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 16-2. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593960600572167

Bakir, R. A., Sahar A. A. 2021: Changing use of public spaces in Cairo during COVID-19. Urban Research & Practice 14-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.2006897

Bieling, C., Plieninger, T., Pirker, H., Vogl, C. R. 2014: Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: An empirical exploration with short interviews. Ecological Economics 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.013

Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. A., Pullin, A. S. 2010: A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10-1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-456

Brondizio, E. S., Settele, J., Díaz, S., Ngo, H. T. (eds.) 2019: Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Report. IPBES secretariat. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3831673

Collado, S., Staats, H., Corraliza, J. A., Hartig, T. 2016: Restorative environments and health. In: Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_7

Craig, T. P., Fischer A., Lorenzo-Arribas, A. 2018: Shopping versus nature? An exploratory study of everyday experiences. Frontiers in Psychology 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00009

Cvejić, R., Eler, K., Pintar, M., Železnikar, Š., Haase, D., Kabisch, N., Strohbach, M. 2015: A typology of urban green spaces, eco-system provisioning services and demands. Report. Green Surge project.

Daily, G. 1997: Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press.

Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., Costanza, R. et al. 2012: Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109-23. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109

De Groot, R., Brander, L., Solomonides, S. 2020: Update of global ecosystem service valuation database (ESVD). Report. Foundation for Sustainable Development.

Dobbs, C., Kendal, D., Nitschke, C. R. 2014: Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecological Indicators 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.007

Dou, Y., Zhen, L., de Groot, R., Du, B., Yu, X. 2017: Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality. Ecosystem Services 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.011

Escobedo, F. J., Kroeger, T., Wagner, J. E. 2011: Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environmental Pollution 159-8,9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010

European Environmental Agency 2018. Towards a common international classification of ecosystem services – CICES. Report. European Environment Agency.

Falk, P., Campbell, C. 1997: The shopping experience. SAGE Publications.

Field, A. 2009: Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE Publications.

Gavrilidis, A., Zakerhaghighi, K., Popa, A., Akbarian, S., Z., Onose, D., Grădinaru, S. R., Slave, R. 2023: Perceptions of cultural ecosystem services provision by small public urban green spaces: Perspectives from different cultural backgrounds. Urban Ecosystems 27-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01480-3

Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., Montes, C. 2010: The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007

Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Barton, D. N., Langemeyer, J., McPhearson, T., O’Farrell, P., Andersson, E. et al. 2013: Urban ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation 22-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0516-1

Gottwald, S. 2022: Sense of place in spatial planning: Applying instrumental and deliberative approaches at the river Lahn. Landscape Online 97. https://doi.org/10.3097/lo.2022.1100

Grace, M. J., Dickie, J., Bartie, P., Brown, C., Oliver, D. M. 2023: Understanding health outcomes from exposure to blue space resources: Towards a mixed methods framework for analysis. Resources 12-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12110135

Grasseni, C. 2022: From branding to solidarity: The COVID-19 impact on marketing Strachítunt cheese from Val Taleggio, Italy. Acta geographica Slovenica 62-2. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.10577

Grzyb, T. 2024: Recreational use of the urban riverscape: What brings people to the river? Moravian Geographical Reports 32-1. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2024-0002

Guo, R. Z., Song, Y. B., Dong, M. 2022: Progress and prospects of ecosystem disservices: An updated literature review. Sustainability 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610396

Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M. 2010: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Ecosystem Ecology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007

Hartig, T., Evans, G., W., Jamner, L., D., Davis, D., S., Gärling, T. 2003: Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00109-3

Hofmann, M., Westermann, J., R., Kowarik, I., Van der Meer, E. 2012: Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.001

Ichsan, A. M., Harisah, A., Radja, A. M. 2019: The visitors’ perception toward the comfort of social interaction in public space (A case study in Karebosi field Makasar). EPI International Journal of Engineering 2-2. https://doi.org/10.25042/epi-ije.082019.10

Ito, K., Kang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, F., Biljecki, F. 2024: Understanding urban perception with visual data: A systematic review. Cities 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105169

Jabbar, M., Yusoff, M. M., Shafie, A. 2022: Assessing the role of urban green spaces for human well-being: A systematic review. GeoJournal 87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-021-10474-7

Jones, L., Anderson, S., Læssøe, J., Banzhaf, E., Jensen, A., Bird, D. N., Miller, J. et al. 2022: A typology for urban green infrastructure to guide multifunctional planning of nature-based solutions. Nature-Based Solutions 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100041

Joye, J., Van den Berg, A. 2013: Restorative environments. In: Environmental psychology: An introduction. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241072.ch7

Karmanov, D., Hamel, R. 2008: Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environment(s): Beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy. Landscape and Urban Planning 86-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.004

Kenward, R., Sharp, R. 2008: Use nationally of wild resources across Europe (UNWIRE). Report. Anatrack Ltd.

Kozina, J., Poljak Istenič, S., Komac, B. 2019: Green creative environments: Contribution to sustainable urban and regional development. Acta Geographica Slovenica 59-1. https://doi.org/10.3986/ags.7030

Krosnick, J. A. 1991: Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305

Lyytimäki, J. 2014: Bad Nature: Newspaper representations of ecosystem disservices. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.04.005

Lyytimäki, J., Kjerulf Petersen, L., Normander, B., Bezák, P. 2008: Nature as a nuisance? Ecosystem services and disservices to urban lifestyle. Environmental Sciences 5-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430802055524

Lyytimäki, J., Sipilä, M. 2009: Hopping on one leg – the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003

Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Conde, S., Vallecillo Rodriguez, S., Barredo Cano, J. I., Paracchini, M. et al. 2020: Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An EU ecosystem assessment. https://doi.org/10.2760/757183

Matos Márquez, L. A, Nunes Rezende, E. C., Borges Machado, K., Martins do Nascimento, E. L., Bardella Castro, J. D., Nabout, J. C. 2023: Trends in valuation approaches for cultural ecosystem services: A systematic literature review. Ecosystem Services 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101572

McAllister, C., Lewis, J., Murphy, S. 2012: The green grass grew all around: Rethinking urban natural spaces with children in mind. Children, Youth and Environments 22-2. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.22.2.0164

Meško, G., Fallshore, M., Muratbegović, E., Fields, C. 2008: Fear of crime in two post-socialist capital cities – Ljubljana, Slovenia and Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Criminal Justice 36-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.09.008

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005: Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Report.

Miller, D. 1998: A theory of shopping. Cornell University Press.

Noszczyk, T., Gorzelany, J., Kukulska-Kozieł, A., Hernik, J. 2022: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the importance of urban green spaces to the public. Land use policy 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105925

Pakfetrat, A., Taghvaei, M., Zarrabi, A. 2020: A comprehensive approach in green space site planning: An application of a three-stage multi-criteria decision support system. Urban Research & Practice 13-1. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1495757

Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landscape and Urban Planning 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.014

Plieninger, T., Áargarð av Rana, H., Fagerholm, N., Ellingsgaard, G. F., Magnussen, E., Raymond, C. M., Olafsson, A. S., Verbrugge, L. N. H. 2018: Identifying and assessing the potential for conflict between landscape values and development preferences on the Faroe Islands. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.006

Plieninger, T., Bieling, C., Fagerholm, N., Byg, A., Hartel, T., Hurley. P., López-Santiago, C. A. et al. 2015: The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.02.006

Plieninger, T., Dijks, S., Oteros Rozas, E., Bieling, C. 2013: Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013

Polajnar Horvat, K., Smrekar, A. 2017: From words to action: Improving drinking water behaviour in the urban environment. Geographia Polonica 90-3. https://doi.org/10.7163/gpol.0094

Poljak Istenič, S. 2019: Participatory urbanism: Creative interventions for sustainable development. Acta geographica Slovenica 59-1. https://doi.org/10.3986/ags.5142

Ribeiro, D., Šmid Hribar, M. 2019: Assessment of land-use changes and their impacts on ecosystem services in two Slovenian rural landscapes. Acta geographica Slovenica 59-2. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.6636

Schumacher, E. F. 1973: Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. New York.

Sen, S., Guchhait, S. 2021: Urban green space in India: Perception of cultural ecosystem services and psychology of situatedness and connectedness. Ecological Indicators 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107338

Shaw, J. 2010: Shopping. Polity Press.

Sielaff, H., Bundschuh, L., Moritz, L., Taubmann, C., Badack, J., Weinhold, K., Hübscher, M. 2024: COVID-19 pandemic and urban green spaces: Shifting usage behaviours and perceptions in Leipzig (Germany)? Moravian geographical reports 32-1. https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2024-0003

Sievänen, T., Arnberger, A., Dehez, J., Jensen, F. 2009: Monitoring of forest recreation demand. In: European Forest Recreation and Tourism. Taylor and Francis.

Šmid Hribar, M., Japelj, A., Vurunić, S. 2021: Systematic mapping of studies on ecosystem services in Slovenia. Geografski vestnik 93-1. https://doi.org/10.3986/gv93101

Smith, N., Georgiou, M., King, A. C., Tieges, Z., Webb, S., Chastin, S. 2021: Urban blue spaces and human health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies. Cities 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103413

Smrekar, A., Breg Valjavec, M., Polajnar Horvat, K., Tiran, J. 2019: The geography of urban environmental protection in Slovenia: The case of Ljubljana. Acta geographica Slovenica 59-3. https://doi.org/10.3986/ags.7638

Smrekar, A., Tiran, J. 2013: Pomen zelenih površin za kakovost bivanja v mestih: razvoj misli skozi čas. Geografski vestnik 85-2.

Suhadolc, M., Govednik, A., Turniški, R., Grčman, H. 2022: Od kakovosti tal do ekosistemskih storitev tal. Geografski vestnik 94-2. https://doi.org/10.3986/gv94205

Sukhdev, P., Wittmer, H., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Nesshöver, C., Bishop, J., Brink, P., Gundimeda, H. et al. 2010: The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Report.

Tengberg, A., Fredholm, S., Eliasson, I., Knez, I., Saltzman, K., Wetterberg, O. 2012: Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006

Tiran, J. 2017: Kakovost bivalnega okolja v Ljubljani. Georitem 28. Založba ZRC. https://doi.org/10.3986/9789612549671

Tiran, J., Ciglič, R., Smrekar, A. 2018: Sprosti se na prostem. Web atlas. Geografski inštitut Antona Melika ZRC SAZU.

Tsunetsugu, Y., Lee, J., Park, B., Tyrväinen, L., Kagawa, T., Miyazaki Y. 2013:

Tyrväinen, L., Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Lanki, T., Tsunetsugu, Y, Kagawa, T. 2014: The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005

Tzortzi (Julia Georgi) N., Ioannou, D. 2022: Greenways in Athens, Greece: Enhancing connectivity through a greenway network in a contemporary European metropolis. Urban Research & Practice 15-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1831049

Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J., James, P. 2007: Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning 81-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001

Urbanc, M., Hori, K., Šmid Hribar, M. 2023: Commons, collective actions and landscapes: A short introduction. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.13206

von Döhren, P., Haase D. 2015: Ecosystem disservices research: A review of the state of the art with a focus on cities. Ecological Indicators 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.027

Wallace, K. J. 2007: Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation 139-3,4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015

Yang, L., Cao, K. 2022: Cultural ecosystem services research progress and future prospects: A review. Sustainability 14-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911845

Downloads

Published

25-11-2024

How to Cite

Smrekar, A., Tiran, J. ., Polajnar Horvat, K. 2024: Unveiling the cultural ecosystem services of urban green spaces: A case study of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Acta geographica Slovenica 64-3. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.13788

Issue

Section

Articles