Encouraging research and development collaboration amidst geographical challenges in less developed regions of the European Union: A systematic literature review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.10934

Keywords:

R&D collaboration, geographical challenges, less developed regions, European Union, systematic literature review, motivational drivers, critical factors

Abstract

This study explores the growing literature on research and development (R&D) collaboration in the context of less developed regions (LDRs) in the European Union (EU) and examines the opportunities for LDRs to successfully collaborate with developed regions. A systematic review of the literature shows that studies on R&D collaboration in LDRs are at the forefront of regional innovation research in the EU and that opportunities to explore this research topic are still wide open. A critical review and synthesis of the selected articles shows that LDRs have equal opportunities to collaborate and build successful relationships with developed regions by paying attention to at least five motivational drivers and critical factors to enhance the success of their R&D collaborations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., McHale, J. 2006: Gone but not forgotten: knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. Journal of Economic Geography 6-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl016

Allen, J., James, A. D., Gamlen, P. 2007: Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D: a case study using social network analysis. R&d Management 37-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00468.x

Amoroso, S., Coad, A., Grassano, N. 2018: European R&D networks: a snapshot from the 7th EU Framework Programme. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 27-5,6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1374037

Arnold, E. 2012: Understanding long-term impacts of R&D funding: The EU framework programme. Research evaluation 21-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs025

Badillo, E. R., Moreno, R. 2018: Does absorptive capacity determine collaboration returns to innovation? A geographical dimension. The Annals of Regional Science 60-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0696-7

Barzotto, M., Corradini, C., Fai, F. M., Labory, S., Tomlinson, P.R. 2019: Enhancing innovative capabilities in lagging regions: An extra-regional collaborative approach to RIS3. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 12-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz003

Bathelt, H., Henn, S. 2014: The geographies of knowledge transfers over distance: toward a typology. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a46115

Bejjani, M., Göcke, L., Menter, M. 2023: Digital entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122372

Berge, L. R. 2017: Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science 96-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12218

Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. 2009: Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of economic geography 9-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp008

Cantner, U., Graf, H. 2006: The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research policy 35-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.002

Capello, R., Cerisola, S. 2021: Catching-up and regional disparities: a resource-allocation approach. European Planning Studies 29-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1823323

Capello, R., Lenzi, C. 2018: Regional innovation evolution and economic performance. Regional Studies 53-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1502421

Capone, F., Lazzeretti, L. 2018: The different roles of proximity in multiple informal network relationships: Evidence from the cluster of high technology applied to cultural goods in Tuscany. Industry and Innovation 25-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1442713

Caragliu, A., Nijkamp, P. 2016: Space and knowledge spillovers in European regions: the impact of different forms of proximity on spatial knowledge diffusion. Journal of Economic Geography 16-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv042

Cecere, G., Corrocher, N. 2015: The intensity of interregional cooperation in information and communication technology projects: An empirical analysis of the Framework Programme. Regional Studies 49-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.759651

Chen, L. C., Lin, Z. X. 2014: Examining the role of geographical proximity in a cluster’s transformation process: the case of Taiwan’s machine tool industry. European Planning Studies 22-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722973

de Barcelos Silva, A., Gomes, M. M., da Costa, C. A., da Rosa Righi, R., Barbosa, J.L.V., Pessin et al. 2020: Intelligent personal assistants: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications 147-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113193

De Noni, I., Orsi, L., Belussi, F. 2018: The role of collaborative networks in supporting the innovation performances of lagging-behind European regions. Research Policy 47-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.006

Di Cataldo, M., Monastiriotis, V., Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2020: How ‘smart’are Smart Specialisation strategies? Journal of Common Market Studies 60-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13156

Dubois, A., Kristensen, I., Teräs, J. 2017: Outsmarting geography: implementing territorial innovation strategies in sparsely populated regions. European Planning Studies 25-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1320355

Filippopoulos, N., Fotopoulos, G. 2022: Innovation in economically developed and lagging European regions: A configurational analysis. Research Policy 51-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104424

Foray, D., 2014. Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773063

Foray, D., Eichler, M., Keller, M. 2021: Smart specialization strategies—insights gained from a unique European policy experiment on innovation and industrial policy design. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy 2-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-020-00026-z

Fritsch, M., Kauffeld-Monz, M. 2010: The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. The Annals of Regional Science 44-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0245-8

Gertler, M. S., Levitte, Y. M. 2005: Local nodes in global networks: the geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry and innovation 12-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710500361981

Ghinoi, S., Steiner, B., Makkonen, T., Hassink, R. 2021: Smart Specialisation strategies on the periphery: a data-triangulation approach to governance issues and practices. Regional Studies 55-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1791321

Grillitsch, M., Nilsson, M. 2015: Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? The Annals of Regional Science 54-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8

Hassink, R., Gong, H. 2019: Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies 27-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898

Hellsmark, H., Mossberg, J., Söderholm, P., Frishammar, J. 2016: Innovation system strengths and weaknesses in progressing sustainable technology: The case of Swedish biorefinery development. Journal of Cleaner Production 131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.109

Janssen, M. J., Bogers, M., Wanzenböck, I. 2020: Do systemic innovation intermediaries broaden horizons? A proximity perspective on R&D partnership formation. Industry and Innovation 27-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1618701

Komlósi, É., Sebestyén, T., Tóth-Pajor, Á., Bedő, Z. 2022: Do specific entrepreneurial ecosystems favor high-level networking while others not? Lessons from the Hungarian IT sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121349

Koschatzky, K. Stahlecker, T. 2010: A new challenge for regional policy-making in Europe? Chances and risks of the merger between cohesion and innovation policy. European Planning Studies 18-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903343492

Lalrindiki, M., O’Gorman, B. 2021: The role of proximity in developing an inter-regional innovation system. Triple Helix 8-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10024

Lata, R., von Proff, S., Brenner, T. 2018: The influence of distance types on co-patenting and co-publishing in the USA and Europe over time. The Annals of Regional Science 61-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-017-0857-y

Lavie, D., Kang, J., Rosenkopf, L. 2011: Balance within and across domains: The performance implications of exploration and exploitation in alliances. Organization Science 22-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0596

Lavoratori, K., Mariotti, S., Piscitello, L. 2020: Location and Intra-firm co-location of MNEs’ activities: Does geographical proximity always matter? Regional Studies 54-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1732901

Lazzeretti, L., Capone, F., Cinti, T. 2010: The regional development platform and “related variety”: Some evidence from art and food in Tuscany. European Planning Studies 18-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903343518

Marek, P., Titze, M., Fuhrmeister, C., Blum, U. 2017: R&D collaborations and the role of proximity. Regional Studies 51-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1242718

Marques, P., Morgan, K. 2021. Innovation without regional development? The complex interplay of innovation, institutions, and development. Economic Geography 97-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2021.1972801

Marrocu, E., Paci, R., Usai, S. 2013: Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: What lessons for innovation policy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.004

McCann, P., Ortega-Argilés, R. 2014: Smart specialisation in European regions: Issues of strategy, institutions and implementation. European Journal of Innovation Management 17-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2014-0052

Meissner, D. 2019: Public-private partnership models for science, technology, and innovation cooperation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 10-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0310-3

Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., Legese, G. 2020: Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX 7-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777

Meyer, C., Gerlitz, L., Klein, M. 2022: Creativity as a Key Constituent for Smart Specialization Strategies (S3), What Is in It for Peripheral Regions? Co-creating Sustainable and Resilient Tourism with Cultural and Creative Industries. Sustainability 14-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063469

Miguelez, E. 2019: Collaborative patents and the mobility of knowledge workers. Technovation 86-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.01.001

Neuländtner, M. 2020: An Empirical Agent-Based Model for Regional Knowledge Creation in Europe. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9080477

Neuländtner, M., Scherngell, T. 2020: Geographical or relational: What drives technology-specific R&D collaboration networks? The Annals of Regional Science 65-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-020-01002-5

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L. et al. 2021: The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic reviews 10-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010

Pandza, K., Wilkins, T.A., Alfoldi, E.A. 2011: Collaborative diversity in a nanotechnology innovation system: Evidence from the EU Framework Programme. Technovation 31-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.05.003

Pires, S. M., Polido, A., Teles, F., Silva, P., Rodrigues, C. 2020: Territorial innovation models in less developed regions in Europe: the quest for a new research agenda? European planning studies 28-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1697211

Proskuryakova, L., Meissner, D., Rudnik, P. 2017: The use of technology platforms as a policy tool to address research challenges and technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer 42-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9421-z

Ranga, M. 2018: Smart specialization as a strategy to develop early-stage regional innovation systems. European Planning Studies 26-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1530149

Ranga, M., Etzkowitz, H. 2013: Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and higher education 27-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165

Razpotnik Visković, N. Logar, E. 2022: Certification, labelling and branding in tourism research: systematic review. Acta geographica Slovenica 62-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.10858

Roehrs, A., Da Costa, C. A., da Rosa Righi, R., De Oliveira, K. S. F. 2017: Personal health records: a systematic literature review. Journal of medical Internet research 19-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5876

Schwartz, M., Peglow, F., Fritsch, M., Günther, J. 2012: What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation?—Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation 32-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.004

Silva, C., Ribeiro, P., Pinto, E. B., Monteiro, P. 2021: Maturity model for collaborative R&D university-industry sustainable partnerships. Procedia Computer Science 181-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.234

Sörvik, J., Teräs, J., Dubois, A., Pertoldi, M. 2019: Smart specialisation in sparsely populated areas: Challenges, opportunities and new openings. Regional Studies 53-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1530752

Tang, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, K., Xu, H., Yi, X. 2020: An analysis on the spatial effect of absorptive capacity on regional innovation ability based on empirical research in China. Sustainability 12-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073021

Tödtling, F., Lehner, P., Kaufmann, A. 2009: Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation 29-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.002

Tödtling, F., Trippl, M. 2005: One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research policy 34-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018

Torre, A. 2008: On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional studies 42-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400801922814

Trippl, M., Zukauskaite, E., Healy, A. 2019: Shaping smart specialization: The role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions. Regional Studies 54-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763

Ulnicane, I. 2022: Artificial Intelligence in the European Union: Policy, ethics and regulation. The Routledge handbook of European integrations. London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429262081-19

Uyarra, E. 2019: Smart Specialization as Place-based Policy: Lessons Learnt? Regional Insights 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2018.00001022

Varga, A., Sebestyén, T. 2017: Does EU Framework Program participation affect regional innovation? The differentiating role of economic development. International Regional Science 40-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017616642821

Wibisono, E. 2022: Smart Specialisation in less-developed regions of the European Union: A Systematic Literature Review. REGION 9-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v9i2.388

Yoon, J., Park, H.W. 2017: Triple helix dynamics of South Korea’s innovation system: a network analysis of inter-regional technological collaborations. Quality & Quantity 51-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0346-x

Downloads

Published

04-08-2023

How to Cite

Wibisono, E. 2023: Encouraging research and development collaboration amidst geographical challenges in less developed regions of the European Union: A systematic literature review. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-1. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.10934

Issue

Section

Articles