Commons, collective actions and landscapes: A short introduction




sustainable governance, management, landscapes, natural resources, alternative approaches, commons, collective actions


In the face of worldwide population growth, increasingly intensive agriculture, depopulation of marginal and less favoured areas, and growing rural-urban migration, two contrasting trends are becoming more pronounced: land abandonment on one hand and intensification of agricultural land on the other hand. Considering the complexity of mentioned issues, which result in landscape impoverishment, biodiversity loss, and a decline in crucial ecosystem services, it is essential to prioritise sustainable governance and management of landscapes and natural resources. Alternative approaches are needed to address these challenges. In this special issue, we focus on the potentials of commons and collective actions in sustaining landscape management and natural resource governance. The term "commons" refers to the way communities collectively manage local resources. Collective action refers to the coordinated efforts and cooperation of a community.


Download data is not yet available.


Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. 2013: Sustaining the Commons. Tempe.

Bogataj, N., Krč., J. 2023: Towards the efficient response of forest owners to large-scale forest damage: An example of forest commons. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI:

Dowding, K. 2013: Collective action problem. Encyclopedia Britannica. Internet: (20. 1. 2021).

Hashimoto, S., Dasgupta, R., Kabaya, K., Matsui, T., Haga, C., Saito, O., Takeuchi, K. 2018: Scenario analysis of land-use and ecosystem services of social-ecological landscapes: Implications of alternative development pathways under declining population in the Noto Peninsula, Japan. Sustainability Science 14-1. DOI:

Hirokawa, Y. 2013: The exploration of a new commons adapted to modern society. Commons & Public Space. Kyoto.

Klein, J., Tucker, C. M., Steger, C., Nolin, A., Reid, R., Hopping, K., Yeh, E., et al. 2019: An integrated community and ecosystem-based approach to disaster risk reduction in mountain systems. Environmental Science & Policy 94. DOI:

Laerhoven, F. 2010: Governing community forests and the challenge of solving two-level collective action dilemmas—A large-N perspective. Global Environmental Change 20-3.

Landis, D. 2017: Designing agricultural landscapes for biodiversity-based ecosystem services. Basic and Applied Ecology 18. DOI:

Martin, P., Williams, J. 2016: Next generation rural natural resource governance: A careful diagnosis. Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development. Cham. DOI:

McKean, M. A. 2000: Common property: What is it, what is it good for, and what makes it work? People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance. Cambridge. DOI:

Nogueira, J., Araújo, J. P., Mamede Alonso, J., Simões, S. 2023: Common lands, landscape management and rural development: A case study in a mountain village in northwest Portugal. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI:

Ombogoh, D., Tanui, J., McMullin, S., Muriuki, J., Mowo, J. 2018: Enhancing adaptation to climate variability in the East African highlands: a case for fostering collective action among smallholder farmers in Kenya and Uganda. Climate and Development 10. DOI:

Palšová, L., Machničová, Z. 2023: Common lands as a system of joint management to contribute to community resilience? Case from Slovakia. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI:

Pipan, P., Šmid Hribar M., Urbanc, M. 2023: Motivation, robustness and benefits of water commons: Insights from small drinking water supply systems. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI:

Renes, H., Kruse, A., Potthoff, K. 2023: Transhumance, commons, and new opportunities: A European perspective. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI:

Ribeiro, D., Šmid Hribar, M. 2019: Assessment of land-use changes and their impacts on ecosystem services in two Slovenian rural landscapes. Acta geographica Slovenica 59-2. DOI:

Šmid Hribar, M., Bole, D., Urbanc, M. 2015: Public and common goods in the cultural landscape. Geografski vestnik 87-2. DOI:

Šmid Hribar, M., Hori, K., Urbanc, M., Saito, O., Zorn, M. 2023: Evolution and new potentials of landscape commons: insights from Japan and Slovenia. Ecosystem Services 59. DOI:

Šmid Hribar, M., Urbanc, M., Zorn, M. 2023: Commons and their contribution to sustaining Slovenian cultural landscapes. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI:

Šumrada, T., Erjavec, E. 2023: Will farmers collaborate to conserve biodiversity? The use of collective bonus in the High Nature Value farmland in Slovenia. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI:

Tucker, C. M., Šmid Hribar, M., Urbanc, M., Bogataj, N., Gunya, A., Rodela, R., Sigura, M., Piani, L. 2023: Governance of interdependent ecosystem services and common-pool resources. Land Use Policy 127. DOI:

Williams, B., Grantham, H., Watson, J., Alvarez, S., Simmonds, J., Rogéliz, C., Silva, M., et al. 2020: Minimising the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in an intact landscape under risk of rapid agricultural development. Environmental Research Letters 15-1. DOI:




How to Cite

Urbanc, M., Hori, K., & Šmid Hribar, M. (2023). Commons, collective actions and landscapes: A short introduction. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 63(3), 9–14.