Commons and their contribution to sustaining Slovenian cultural landscapes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11591Keywords:
commons, new commons, transforming commons, collective actions, nature’s contribution to people, cultural landscape, SloveniaAbstract
The main challenge of cultural landscapes is how to manage them, and the concept of commons through collective actions can help in this regard. Based on a questionnaire, 21 collective actions related to cultural landscapes in Slovenia were examined using descriptive statistics. Results show that 1) traditional and transforming commons deal with forests and pastures, whereas new ones are more diverse regarding land use but in significantly smaller areas; 2) new commons indicate possible future mechanism, but they do not (yet) have an impact on cultural landscapes; 3) the main benefits of commons refer to social aspects followed by non-material and regulative benefits; material benefits are ranked last; and 4) new collective actions, especially in urban areas, have difficulties obtaining lands which threatens their existence.
Downloads
References
Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A. 2013: Sustaining the commons. Internet: http://sustainingthecommons.asu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Sustaining-the-Commons-v101.pdf (1. 3. 2015).
Bogataj, N., Krč, J. 2014: A forest commons revival in Slovenia. Society and Natural Resources 27-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.918225
Bogataj, N., Krč., J. 2023: Towards the efficient response of forest owners to large-scale forest damage: An example of forest commons. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11084
Bromley, D. V. 1992: Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, Policy. San Francisco.
Deisinger, M. 2012: Po poteh dediščine meščanske korporacije. Kamnik.
Delfanti, L., Colantoni, A., Recanatesi, F., Bencardino, M., Sateriano, A., Zambon, I., Salvati, L. 2016: Solar plants, environmental degradation and local socioeconomic contexts: A case study in a Mediterranean country. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.003
Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polasky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bukvareva, E., Davies, K., Demissew, S., Erpul, G., Failler, P., Guerra, C. A., Hewitt, C. L., Keune, H., Lindley, S., Shirayama, Y. 2018: Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359(6373). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826.
Duraiappah, A. K., Asah, S. T., Brondizio, E. S., Kosoy, N., O’Farrell, P. J., Prieur-Richard, A.-H., Subramanian, S. M., Takeuchi, K. 2014: Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem services for human well-being: A conceptual framework for understanding the new commons. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.031
Gatto, P., Bogataj, N. 2015: Disturbances, robustness and adaptation in forest commons: Comparative insights from two cases in the South-eastern Alps. Forest Policy and Economics 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.03.011
Haller, T., Bertogliati, M., Liechti, K., Stuber, M., Viallon F.-X., Wunderli, R. 2021: Transformation and diversity: Synthesis of the case studies. Balancing the Commons in Switzerland: Institutional Transformations and Sustainable Innovations. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003043263-13
Hirahara, S. 2020: Regeneration of underused natural resources by collaboration between urban and rural residents: A case study in Fujiwara district, Japan. International Journal of the Commons 14-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.977
Hrvatin, M., Perko, D. 2008: Landscape characteristics of common land in Slovenia. Acta geographica Slovenica 48-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS48101
Jarzebski, M. P., Elmqvist, T., Gasparatos, A., Fukushi, K., Eckersten, S., Haase, D., Goodness, J., Khoshkar, S., Saito, O., Takeuchi, K., Theorell, T., Dong, N., Kasuga, F., Watanabe, R., Sioen, G. B., Yokohari, M., Pu, J. 2021: Ageing and population shrinking: Implications for sustainability in the urban century. npj Urban Sustainability 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00023-z
Jurman, U., Lovšin, P. 2021: Onkraj vrtičkov: skupnostni vrt Onkraj gradbišča. Ljubljana.
Kissling-Näf, I., Volken, T., Bisang, K. 2002: Common property and natural resources in the Alps: The decay of management structures? Forest Policy and Economics 4-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00013-8
Kristensen, S. B. P. 2016: Agriculture and landscape interaction—landowners’ decision-making and drivers of land use change in rural Europe. Land Use Policy 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.025
Kukovič, S., Brezovšek, M. 2016: The development of local government in Slovenia. Democratisation Processes in Poland and Slovenia: comparative study. Maribor.
Ledinek Lozej, Š. 2013: Paša in predelava mleka v planinah Triglavskega narodnega parka: kulturna dediščina in aktualna vprašanja. Traditiones 42-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/Traditio2013420203
Mauerhofer, V., Ichinose, T., Blackwell, B. D., Willig, M. R., Flint, C. G., Krause, M. S., Penker, M. 2018: Underuse of social-ecological systems: A research agenda for addressing challenges to biocultural diversity. Land Use Policy 72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.003
McGinnis, M. 2011: An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom Workshop: a simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal 39-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x
McKean, M. A. 2000: Common property: What is it, what is it good for, and what makes it work? People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance. Cambridge.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment - MEA, 2005: Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC.
Ostrom, E. 1990: The governing of commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763
Ostrom, E. 2005: Understanding institutional diversity. New Jersey. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7s7wm
Petek, F., Urbanc, M. 2007: Skupna zemljišča v Sloveniji. Geografski vestnik 79-2.
Pipan, P., Šmid Hribar, M., Urbanc, M. 2023: Motivation, robustness and benefits of water commons: Insights from small drinking water supply systems. Acta geographica Slovenica 63-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11592
Poljak Istenič, S., Šmid Hribar, M., Kozina, J. 2023: Nexus of urban gardening and social sustainability in post-socialist cities. Urban Agriculture and Regional Food Systems: Building Resilient Food Systems. London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820286-9.00013-3
Premrl, T. 2013: Analiza stanja agrarnih skupnosti v Sloveniji na podlagi podatkov upravnih enot. Ekspertiza, Gozdarski inštitut Slovenije. Ljubljana.
Premrl, T., Udovč, A., Bogataj, N., Krč, J. 2015: From restitution to revival: A case of commons re-establishment and restitution in Slovenia. Forest Policy and Economics 59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.004
Ribeiro, D., Šmid Hribar, M. 2019: Assessment of land-use changes and their impacts on ecosystem services in two Slovenian rural landscapes. Acta geographica Slovenica 59-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.6636
Rodela, R. 2012: Uvod v skupno lastnino in skupno upravljanje naravnih virov. Soupravljanje naravnih virov: vaške skupnosti in sorodne oblike skupne lastnine in skupnega upravljanja. Wageningen.
Saito, O., Ichikawa, K. 2014: Socio-ecological systems in paddy-dominated landscapes in Asian Monsoon. Social-Ecological Restoration in Paddy-Dominated Landscapes. Tokyo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55330-4_2
Shimada, D. 2014: External impacts on traditional commons and present-day changes: A case study of Iriai forests in Yamaguni district, Kyoto, Japan. International Journal of the Commons 8-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/bmgn-lchr.348
Stritar, A. 2020: Planinski geografski informacijski sistem – PlanGIS. Modeliranje pokrajine. GIS v Sloveniji 15. Ljubljana. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/9789610504696_15
Šmid Hribar, M., Bole, D., Urbanc, M. 2015: Public and common goods in the cultural landscape. Geografski vestnik 87-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3986/GV87203
Šmid Hribar, M., Hori, K., Urbanc, M., Saito, O., Zorn, M. 2023: Evolution and new potentials of landscape commons: insights from Japan and Slovenia. Ecosystem Services 59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101499
Šmid Hribar, M., Kozina, J., Bole, D., Urbanc, M. 2018: Public goods, common-pool resources, and the commons: The influence of historical legacy on modern perceptions in Slovenia as a transitional society. Urbani izziv 29-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-2018-29-01-004
Šmid Hribar, M., Urbanc, M. 2016: Thee nexus between landscape elements and traditional practices for cultural landscape management. Biocultural Diversity in Europe. Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26315-1_28
Šmid Hribar, M., Urbanc, M. 2022: Enclosed landscapes in Slovenia. Enclosed Landscapes as Part of the European Agricultural Heritage. London.
Takeuchi, K., Ichikawa, K., Elmqvist, T. 2016: Satoyama landscape as social–ecological system: Historical changes and future perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.001
Tornaghi, C. 2012: Public space, urban agriculture and the grassroots creation of new commons: lessons and challenges for policy makers. Sustainable Food Planning: Evolving Theory and Practice. Wageningen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-187-3_29
UNESCO 2019: Operational guidelines for the implementation of the World Heritage Convention. Paris.
Urbanc, M., Fridl, J., Resnik Planinc, T. 2021: Landscapes as represented in textbooks and in students’ imagination: stability, generational gap, image retention and recognisability. Children's Geographies 19-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2020.1817333
Urbanc, M., Ledinek Lozej, Š., Šmid Hribar, M. in press: Mountain pastures in the Slovenian Alps: Their role in shaping and sustaining the cultural landscape. Discourses on Mountains of Montenegro and Slovenia. Cham.
Urbanc, M., Šmid Hribar, M., Kumer, P. 2020: Culture in Slovenia. The Geography of Slovenia: Small But Diverse. Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14066-3_13
Woestenburg, M. 2018: Heathland farm as a new commons? Landscape Research 43-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2018.1503236
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ZRC SAZU Anton Melik Geographical Institute
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
