Comprehension of rapidly transforming landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe in the 20th century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS44204Keywords:
Central and Eastern Europe, landscape changes, landscape perception, alienation from land-scapesAbstract
The article presents landscapes as natural, historical, cultural, social and political phenom-ena, and above all as a meaningful part of the environment. We will argue – by giving a contextual framework of landscape changes followed by four case studies from Central and Eastern Europe – that comprehen-sion of landscapes has declined in the 20thcentury. Along with urbanization, globalization and other societal processes rapidly varying socio-economic formations have caused alienation: changes in power result in changes in a society's values and thus some landscape elements are disintegrating, fading or disappear-ing and, as a result, these landscapes are taking on new, altered or modified appearances, functions and meanings. Every change in landscape needs some time to become accepted but if this re-coding of what is regarded as valuable is constantly changing, people become confused, with resultant physical conse-quences: land abandonment; illegal dumping; ill fitting infrastructures; inappropriate housing developments; etc. The main question is whether modern development, e.g. tourism, enhances the relationship between people and the landscape.Downloads
References
Alumäe, H., Printsmann, A., Palang, H. 2003: Cultural and historical values in landscape planning: locals' perception. Landscape interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes. Dordrecht.
Antrop, M. 1998: Landscape change: plan or chaos? Landscape and Urban Planning 41, 3–4. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00068-1
Antrop, M. 2000: Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 77. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00089-4
Antrop, M. 2002: Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning 70, 1–2. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002
Appleton, J. 1996: The experience of landscape. Chichester.
Bourassa, S.C. 1991: The aesthetics of landscape. London.
Buraczynski, J. 1997: Roztocze: structure-relief-landscape. Lublin.
Chalupczak, H., Browarek, T. 1998: National minorities in Poland 1918–1995. Lublin.
Claval, P. 2004: The languages of rural landscapes. European rural landscapes: persistence and change in a globalising environment. Dordrecht.
Cosgrove, D.E. 1984: Social formation and symbolic landscape. Madison.
Harteisen, U. 2000: Die Senne. Eine historisch-ökologische Landschaftsanalyse als Plannungsinstrument im Naturschutz. Münster.
Gabrovec, M., Kladnik, D. 1997: Some new aspects of land use in Slovenia. Geografski zbornik 37. Ljubljana.
Gustavsson, R., Peterson, A. 2003: Authenticity in landscape conservation and management: the importance of the local context. Landscape interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes. Dordrecht.
Jääts, I. 1998: Setude etniline identiteet. Studia Ethnologica Tartuensia I. Tartu.
Jones, M. 2003: The concept of cultural landscape: discourse and narratives. Landscape interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes. Dordrecht.
Internet: http://www.coe.int/t/e/Cultural_Co-operation/Environment/Landscape/. (20.12.2004).
Keisteri, T. 1990: The study of changes in cultural landscapes. Fennia 168, 1. Helsinki.
Kladnik, D., Rejec Brancelj, I. 1997: The human geography of Kras. Kras. Ljubljana.
Kohli, M. 1996: The problems of generation: family, economy, politics. Public lectures. http://www.colbud.hu/main/PubArchive/PL/PL14-Kohli.pdf (20.12.2004).
Konkolyné Gyuró, É. 2000: Tájszerkezet vizsgálat Landscape structure analysis. A FHNPark földrajzi információs rendszerének kifejlesztése GIS system of the Ferto´´-Hanság National Park University of Western Hungary. Sopron.
Konkolyné Gyuró, É. 2002: Tájkaraktert formáló történelem Landscape character formed by history. Paper presented on the conference: »Geographical History of Transdanubien«, in Press.
Lefebvre, H. 1991: Production of space. Oxford.
Lowenthal, D. 1997: European landscape transformations: the rural residue. Understanding Ordinary Landscapes. New Haven.
Mikesell, M. 2000: Culture. The dictionary of Human geography. Oxford.
Moore, D.K. 1999: Holdfast: At home in the natural world. New York.
Ogrin, D. 1999: Kulturna krajina: pojmi – problemi – vizija (Cultural landscape: ideas – problems – vision). Kulturna krajina v dinamiki varstva in razvoja. Ljubljana.
Olwig, K.R. 2002: Landscape, nature and the body politic: from Britain's renaissance to America's New world. Madison.
Palang, H., Alumäe, H., Mander, Ü. 2000: Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 50. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00081-5
Palang, H., Fry, G. 2003: Landscape interfaces. Landscape interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes. Dordrecht.
Palang, H., Printsmann, A., Alumäe, H., Kaur, E., Oja, T., Prede, M., Pungas, P., Reimann, M., Sooväli, H. 2003: Local people as shapers of sustainability of rural landscapes. Ecosystems and sustainable deve-lopment, vol. 2. Advances in Ecological Sciences 19. Southampton.
Põldmäe, R. 1938: Rahvakultuurist, eriti rahva lõbutsemis vormidest Setumaal. Eesti Rahvaluule Arhiiv. Tallinn.
Perko, D. 1998: Prebivalstvo. Geografija Slovenije. Ljubljana.
Perko, D., Orožen Adamič, M. 1998: Slovenija – pokrajine in ljudje (Slovenia – landscape and people). Ljubljana.
Ränk, G. 1957: Eesti kultuuri piiripost kagus. Meie maa. Eesti sõnas ja pildis IV. Lõuna-Eesti.
Relph, E. 1986: Place and placelessness. London.
Robertson, I., Richards, P. 2003: Studying cultural landscapes. London.
Sauer, C.O. 1925: The morphology of landscape. Reprinted in Leighly, J. 1963: Land and life: selection from the writing of Carl Ortwin Sauer. Berkeley, Los Angeles.
Schama, S. 1995: Landscape and memory. New York.
Simonsen, K. 1996: What kind of space in what kind of social theory? Progress in Human Geography 20, 4. London. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030913259602000404
Skowronek, E. 1999: Anthropogenic transformations of the Roztocze landscape as exemplified by the Biala Lada and upper Wieprz drainage basins. Doctoral dissertation, manuscript. Lublin.
Skowronek, E., Krukowska, R., Swieca, A. 2003: Transformations of cultural landscape: the case of the Polish-Ukrainian borderland. Landscape interfaces. Cultural heritage in changing landscapes. Dordrecht.
Stenseke, M. 1999: Landscape perspectives on landscape values. Shaping the Land, vol. 3: The future of the past. Proceedings of the Permanent European Conference for the Study of the Rural Landscape. Trondheim.
Town Index for the Polish Republic, vol. 4, 1924. Warsaw.
Town index for the Polish Republic, vol. 13, 1924. Warsaw.
Tuan, Y. 2003: Space and place: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis, London.
Urbanc, M. 2002: Kulturne pokrajine v Sloveniji Cultural landscapes in Slovenia. Ljubljana.
Valk, H. 1996: Aegadest ja ajatunetusest Setomaal. Palve, vanapatt ja pihlakas. Setomaa. Vanavaravedaja 4. Setomaa 1994. Tartu.
Vervloet, A. 1986: Inleiding tot de historische geografie van de Nederlandse cultuurlandschappen. Wageningen.
Vos, V., Meekes, H. 1999: Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landscape and Urban Planning 46. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
