Konceptualni okvir analize politik sprejema: študija primera trenutne usmeritve nemške azilne politike
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/dd.2017.1.02Ključne besede:
prosilci za azil, radikalna politična desnica, begunci, struktura/delovanje, politična debataPovzetek
Nemška azilna politika je leta 2015, ko se je v primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti občutno povečalo število prošenj za azil, doživela presenetljiv premik. V nasprotju s pričakovanji nemška vlada ni zaostrila pogojev sprejema, kot je bilo to v navadi v preteklosti, temveč je beguncem izrazila dobrodošlico. Članek ponuja analizo dogodkov, ki so pripeljali do tovrstne vladne usmeritve, in pri tem uporabi konceptualni okvir, ki upošteva strukturo, delovanje in njun preplet. Osredotoča se na procese znotraj strankarskega političnega sistema in analizo morebitnega vpliva nanj s strani struktur v širšem družbenopolitičnem in ekonomskem okolju, ter percepcij, verovanj in ciljev politikov. Izsledki kažejo, da se je med konzervativno stranko CDU in socialnodemokratsko stranko SPD oblikovala nova zaveza. Obe sta zavzeli stališče, da so nekateri migranti zaščite bolj »potrebni« kot drugi. S hierarhizacijo sta domet humanitarizma v Nemčiji omejili na specifične skupine migrantov in beguncev.
Prenosi
Literatura
Archer, Margaret S. (1995). Realist Social Theory – The Morphogenic Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Boswell, Christina (2009). The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (2016). Das Bundesamt in Zahlen 2015 – Asyl., http://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Publikationen/Broschueren/bundesamt-in zahlen-2015-asyl.pdf (26. 6. 2016).
Castles, Stephen (2007). Twenty-First-Century Migration as a Challenge to Sociology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33/3, 351–371.
Castles, Stephen, Kosack, Godula (1973). Immigrant Workers and Class Structure in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cornelius, Wayne A., Rosenblum, Marc R. (2005). Immigration and Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 8, 99–119.
Edelmann, Murray (1988). Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Federal Ministry of the Interior (2015). Annual Report on the Protection of the Constitution: Facts and Trends, https://www.verfassungsschutz.de/embed/annual-report-2015-summary.pdf (25. 5. 2016).
Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (2016). The distribution of asylum applicants, http://www.bamf.de/EN/Migration/AsylFluechtlinge/Asylverfahren/Verteilung/verteilung-node.html.
Feldenkirchen, Markus, Pfister, René (2016). The Isolated Chancellor: What Is Driving Angela Merkel? Spiegel online, January 25, (25. 5. 2016).
Freeman, Gary. P. (1979). Immigrant Labor and Racial Conflict in Industrial Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Freeman, Gary P. (1995). Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States, International Migration Review 29/4, 881–902.
Freeman, Gary P. (2006) National Models, Policy Types, and the Politics of Immigration in Liberal Democracies. West European Politics 29/2, 227–247.
Geddes, Andrew P. (2003) The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London: Sage.
Gibney, Matthew (2004). Ethics of Political Asylum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guiraudon, Virginie (2000). European Integration and Migration Policy: Vertical Policy-Making as Venue Shopping. Journal of Common Market Studies 38/2, 251–271.
Joppke, Christian (1999). Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Joppke, Christian (2008). Immigration and the Identity of Citizenship: The Paradox of Universalism. Citizenship Studies 12/6, 533–546.
Kay, Diane, Miles, Robert (1992). Refugees or Migrant Workers? London: Routledge.
Lahav, Gallya, Guiraudon, Virginie (2006). Immigration Policy in Europe: The Politics of Control. West European Politics, Special Issue 29/2, 201–223.
Lahav, Gallya, Guiraudon, Virginie (2006). Actors and Venues in Immigration Control: Closing the Gap Between Political Demands and Policy Outcomes. West European Politics 29/2, 201–223.
Levine, Paul (1999). The Welfare Economics of Immigration Control. Journal of Population Economics 12/1, 23–43.
Kelly, Ninette, Trebilcock, Michael (1998). The Making of a Mosaic: A History of Canadian Immigration Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Münch, Ursula (1992). Asylpolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Perlmutter, Ted (1996). Bringing Parties Back In. International Migration Review 30/1, 375–388.
Prantl, Heribert (2011). Asylum in Europe – a mirage across the water. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 3. 8. 2016.
Prantl, Heribert (2015a). How the EU is killing refugees. Süddeutsche Zeitung.
Prantl, Heribert (2015b). Viewpoint: Munich migrant welcome shames Europe. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 7. 9. 2015.
Prantl, Heribert (2015c). Im Namen der Menschlichkeit Rettet die Flüchtlinge! Berlin: Ullstein Buchverlage.
ProAsyl (2016). Despite subsequent improvements: EU-Turkey deal violates fundamental human rights! Frankfurt am Main: ProAsyl, 17. 3. 2016.
Rich, Paul (1986). Race and Empire in British Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rottman, Andy J. et al. (2009). The Path to Asylum in the US and the Determinants for Who Gets in and Why. The International Migration Review 43/1, 3–34.
Sassen, Saskia (1996). Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schain, Martin A. (2006). The Extreme Right and Immigration Policy-Making: Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects. West European Politics 29/2, 270–289.
Schneider, Claudia (2006). Analysing immigration control policy: A case study regarding the amendment of Art. 16 (2) of the German Constitution (Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London), http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.439537.
Schneider Claudia (2009). The use of conceptual frameworks to investigate the structureagency link in comparative immigration policy and its relevance to social work. Theories and Methods in Social Work: International Perspectives (ed. Vesna Leskošek). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Work.
Sen, Amartya (1982). Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.
Simon, Herbert (1982). Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Spector, Malcolm, Kitsuse, John I. (1987). Constructing Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Spiegel online (2015). Mehrheit gegen zusaetzliche Fluechtlinge in Deutschland, http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/mehrheit-gegen-zusaetzlichen-f luechtlinge-in-deutschland-a-927256.html (16. 7. 2016).
Statham, Paul, Geddes, Andrew (2006). Elites and the “Organised Public”: Who Drives British Immigration Politics and in which Direction? West European Politics 29/2, 248–269.
Strauss, Anselm, Corbin, Juliet (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thouez, Colleen, Channac, Frédérique (2006). Shaping International Migration Policy: The Role of Regional Consultative Processes. West European Politics 29/2, 370–387.
UNHCR (2016a). EUROPE: Syrian Asylum Applications – From April 2011 to May 2016, https://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/asylum.php (16. 7. 2016).
UNHCR (2016b). Key Facts and Figures, http://ww2.unhcr.org.uk/about-us/key-facts-andfigures.html (16. 7. 2016).
Verfassungsschutz (2014). Figures and Facts Right Wing Extremism, https://www.verfassungsschutz.de/en/fields-of-work/right-wing-extremism/figures-and-facts-rightwing-extremism/right-wing-extremist-crimes-and-violent-offences-2014.html.
ZDF-Politbarometer (2015), https://presseportal.zdf.de/.
Zincone, Giovanna (2006). The Making of Policies: Immigration and Immigrants in Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32/3, 347–375.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Avtorji jamčijo, da je delo njihova avtorska stvaritev, da v njem niso kršene avtorske pravice tretjih oseb ali kake druge pravice. V primeru zahtevkov tretjih oseb se avtorji zavezujejo, da bodo varovali interese založnika ter da bodo povrnili morebitno škodo.
Podrobneje v rubriki: Prispevki
