Preoblikovanje tvornosti v luči globalnih izzivov
Problem plastičnih odpadkov
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/Traditio2020490102Ključne besede:
kriza z odpadki, plastični odpadki, tvornosti, miazma, krožno gospodarstvo, trgovine brez embalaže, SlovenijaPovzetek
Avtorica obravnava vprašanje tvornosti v času skupnih izzivov, ki se kažejo na lokalni in globalni ravni. Posebej razpravlja o razpršeni, nelinearno pojmovani individualni tvornosti, ko gre za globalno krizo plastičnih odpadkov, kot načinu obravnave in spodbujanja strategij sprememb.
Prenosi
Literatura
Bajuk Senčar, Tatiana. 2017a. Kultura udobja in razvoj trajnostne prometne infrastrukture. Glasnik Slovenskega etnološkega društva 57 (3/4): 66–74.
Bajuk Senčar, Tatiana. 2017b. Researching the Culture of Comfort: The Use of Interviews in Ethnographic Studies of Mobility. In: Dan Podjed, Simona Bezjak and Saša Babič (eds.), Research on the Road: Methodology and Practice of Studying Traffic, Driving Habits, and Sustainable Mobility. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, 43–61.
Bulow, Jeremy. 1986. An Economic Theory of Planned Obsolescence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101 (4): 729–749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884176.
Cigler, Primož. 2019. Palomin WC papir brez plastične embalaže. June 13. https://rifuzl.si/objave/paloma-wc-papir-brez-plasticne-embalaze/ (January 19, 2020).
Cullen, Jonathan M. 2017. Circular Economy: Theoretical Benchmark or Perpetual Motion Machine? Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (3): 483–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12599.
Davis, Heather. 2015. Life & Death in the Anthropocene: A Short History of Plastic. In: Heather Davis and Etienne Turpin (eds.), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters Among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies. Open Humanities Press, 347–358. http://heathermdavis.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Life-and-Death-in-the-Anthropocene.pdf (February 2, 2020).
De Decker, Kris. 2018. How Circular is the Circular Economy? Uneven Earth. November 27. http://unevenearth.org/2018/11/how-circular-is-the-circular-economy/.
Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concept of Pollution and Taboo. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Dowling, Tim. 2001. Inventor of the Disposable Culture – King Camp Gillette 1855–1932. London: Short Books.
EPA. 1999. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guide for Industrial Waste Management. Washington DC: EPA.
European Commission. 2018. A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/plastics-strategy-brochure.pdf (January 19, 2020).
Gardner, Gerald T., and Paul C. Stern. 2002. Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. New York: Pearson Custom Publishing.
Halden, Rolf U. 2010. Plastics and Health Risks. Annual Review of Public Health 31 (1): 179–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103714.
Hawkins, Gay. 2005. The Ethics of Waste: How We Relate to Rubbish. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefields Publishers.
Hawkins, Gay. 2013. Made to be Wasted: PET and Topologies of Disposability. In: Jennifer Gabrys, Gay Hawkins and Mike Michael (eds.), Accumulation: The Material Politics of Plastic. London and New York: Routledge, 49–67.
Hawkins, Gay. 2019. Disposability. Discard Studies. May 21. https://discardstudies.com/2019/05/21/disposability/ (January 19, 2020).
Hawkins, Gay, David Boarder Giles, Catherine Philips, and Alex Zahara. 2019. Myths of the Circular Economy. Discard Studies. November 18. https://discardstudies.com/2019/11/18/myths-of-the-circular-economy/ (January 19, 2020).
Humes, Edward. 2013. Garbology: Our Dirty Love Affair with Trash. Penguin.
Leonard, Annie. 2010. The Story of Stuff: The Impact of Overconsumption on the Planet, Our Communities, and Our Health-And How We Can Make It Better. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Liboiron, Max. 2013. Plasticizers: A Twenty-First Century Miasma. In: Jennifer Gabrys, Gay Hawkins and Mike Michael (eds.), Accumulation: The Material Politics of Plastic. London and New York: Routledge, 148–163.
Liboiron, Max. 2016. Municipal versus Industrial Waste: Questioning the 3-97 Ratio. Discard Studies. March 21. https://discardstudies.com/2016/03/02/municipal-versus-industrial-waste-a-3-97-ratio-or-something-else-entirely/.
MacBride, Samantha. 2011. Recycling Reconsidered: The Present Failure and Future Promise of Environmental Action in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Moreau, Vincent, Marlyne Sahakian, Pascal van Griethuysen, and François Vuille. 2017. Coming Full Circle: Why Social and Institutional Dimensions Matter for the Circular Economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (3): 497–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12598.
Nagle, Robin. 2013. Picking Up: On the Streets and Behind the Trucks with the Sanitation Workers of New York City. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Polajnar Horvat, Katarina. 2015. Okolju prijazno vedenje. Ljubljana: ZRC Publishing House.
Prijatelj Videmšek, Maja, and Borut Tavčar. 2019. Glavni okoljski izzivi, ki jih Slovenija mora rešiti. Delo, January 7. https://www.delo.si/novice/okolje/glavni-okoljski-izzivi-ki-jih-slovenija-mora-resiti-135785.html (January 19, 2020).
Royte, Elizabeth. 2006. Garbage Land: On the Secret Trail of Trash. New York: Back Bay Books.
Siol.net. 2009. V Medvodah prvi “mlekomat” v Sloveniji. April 28. https://siol.net/novice/novice/v-medvodah-prvi-mlekomat-v-sloveniji-110160 (February 4, 2020).
Strasser, Susan. 1999. Waste and Want: A Social History of Trash. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Tisserant, Alexandre, Stefan Pauliuk, Stefano Merciai, Jannick Schmidt, Jacob Fry, Richard Wood, and Arnold Tukker. 2017. Solid Waste and the Circular Economy: A Global Analysis of Waste Treatment and Waste Footprints. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (3): 628–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12562.
Valenzuela, Francisco, and Steffen Böhm. 2017. Against Wasted Politics: A Critique of the Circular Economy. ephemera: theory & politics in organization 17 (1): 23–60.
Vance, Packard. 1963. The Waste Makers. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Winans, Kiara, Alissa Kendall, and Hui Deng. 2017. The History and Current Applications of the Circular Economy Concept. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68: 825–833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.123.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Avtorji jamčijo, da je delo njihova avtorska stvaritev, da v njem niso kršene avtorske pravice tretjih oseb ali kake druge pravice. V primeru zahtevkov tretjih oseb se avtorji zavezujejo, da bodo varovali interese založnika ter da bodo povrnili morebitno škodo.
Podrobneje v rubriki: Prispevki
