The Innateness of Clear and Distinct Ideas

Authors

  • Matija Jan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/9789610505945_03

Keywords:

Descartes, idea, representation, innateness, faculty, implicit knowledge

Abstract

The thesis of the innateness of ideas is one of the fundamental characteristics of Descartes’ epistemology. Because he does not provide us with its explicit definition, we are posed with the following question: Is the innateness of ideas a unitary concept, or rather a word designating elements derived from different theoretical models? In focusing on clear and distinct ideas, the aim of this article is to show that Descartes consistently uses only one theory of innate ideas. In the first part, I form a list of innate ideas and pose a series of problems, which a consistent theory of innate ideas should solve. In the second part, I show one response to these questions that can be found in Descartes’ response to a pamphlet written by his former ally, Henricus Regius. I show that Descartes derives the innate character of ideas from their potential existence in the faculty of thought. In the third part, I take into consideration an account of innateness from the Meditations and show two possible models of innateness. I conclude by noting that the model that Descartes actually follows is the one also found in his response to Regius.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beyssade, Jean Marie Beyssade. »The Idea of God and Proofs of His Existence.« V The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, uredil John Cottingham, 174–99.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Cook, Monte L.. »The Alleged Ambiguity of 'Idea' in Descartes' Philosophy.« The Soutwestern Journal of Philosophy 6, št. 1 (zima, 1975): 87–94.

Costa, Michael J.. »What Cartesian Ideas are not.« Journal of the History of Philosophy 21, št. 4 (oktober, 1983): 537–49.

Descartes, René. Meditacije. Ljubljana: Slovenska matica, 1988.

Descartes, René. »Misli k dokazu bivanja Boga in razlike med dušo in telesom urejeno po geometrijski metodi.« Phainomena, št. 17–18 (1996): 5–13.

Descartes, René. Ouvres de Descartes. Paris: J. Vrin, 1996.

Descartes, René. »Principi filozofije. Prvi del. O principih človeškega spoznanja.« Problemi-Razprave 27, št. 5 (1989): 47–78.

Gueroult, Martial. Descartes selon l'ordre des raisons I., l'âme et dieu. Paris: Aubier, 1953.

Gueroult, Martial. Descartes selon l'ordre des raisons II., l'âme at le corps. Paris: Aubier, 1953.

Kenny, Anthony. Descartes: A study of his philosophy. New York: Random house, 1968.

Lennon, Thomas M.. »The Inherence Pattern and Descartes' Ideas.« Journal of the History of Philosophy 12, št. 1 (januar, 1974): 43–52.

McRae, Robert. »'Idea' as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century.« Journal of the History of Ideas 26, št. 2 (april – junij, 1965): 175–90.

McRae, Robert. »Innate Ideas.« V Cartesian studies, uredil R. J. Butler, 32–52. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972.

Miles, Murray. »The Idea of Extension: Innate or Adventitious? On R. F. McRae's Interpretation of Descartes.« Dialogue (pomlad, 1988): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217300019442.

Nadler, Steven M. Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy of Ideas. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1989.

Nadler, Steven M. Malebranche and Ideas. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

Schmaltz, Tad M. »Descartes on innate ideas, sensation, and scholasticism: The response to Regius«, v Studies in Seventeenth-Century European philosophy, uredil M. A. Stewart, 33–73. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

Yolton, John W. »Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy.« Journal of the History of Philosophy 13, št. 2 (april, 1975): 145–65.

Yolton, John W. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.

Published

2026-05-01

Issue

Section

Prispevki