To je stara verzija objvaljena 2021-12-31. Preberite najnovejšo verzijo.

Politika perverzije: rasizirana razlika in skupno dobro

Avtorji

  • Andreja Zevnik University of Manchester, Združeno kraljestvo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.42.3.10

Ključne besede:

perverzija, užitek, protirasistični protesti, politični kipi, rasa

Povzetek

Ko so v Bristolu junija 2020 protirasistični protestniki prevrnili kip Edwarda Colstona, so politične elite vzdolž celotnega političnega spektra levo-desno, kljub pripoznanju, da kip trgovca s sužnji ne sme imeti svojega mesta v sodobni politiki, pozvale k odločni uveljavitvi zakona in reda. Članek skozi primer Colstonovega kipa raziskuje, kaj nam lahko Lacanova ideja perverzije razkrije glede razmerja moči med političnimi elitami in protirasističnimi protestniki. Uvodoma razpravlja o nemožnosti etike v kontekstu političnega, nato pa se posveti vprašanju užitka in njegove vloge pri ustvarjanju rasiziranega drugega in političnih institucij (ter mitov o belski nadvladi). Če je užitek drugega tisto, kar drugega rasizira kot deviantnega, pa je užitek perverzneža razosebljen užitek, ki  naj bi sledil »višjemu dobru«. Na ta način članek trdi, da perverzija razkriva logiko rasnih hierarhij, ki podpirajo in ohranjajo sodobne družbe.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Ahmed, Sara, »A phenomenology of whiteness«, Feminist Theory, 8 (2/2007), str. 149–168.

Badiou, Alain, Ethics: an essay of the understanding of evil, London in New York, Verso, 2013.

Choksey, Lara, »Colston Falling«, Journal of Historical Geography (2020), DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2020.07.007.

Dolar, Mladen, »Onstran interpelacije«, v Razpol 4 (1988), str. 265–274.

Eyres, Zosia in PA, »Prime Minister Boris Johnsonʼs reaction to Edward Colston statue being torn down«, Bristol Post, 8. junij 2020, https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/prime-minister-boris-johnsons-reaction-4204340.

Freud, Sigmund, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, New York, W.W. Norton, 1990.

Hesse, Barnor, »White Sovereignty (…), Black Life Politics: ‘The N****t They Couldnʼt Killʼ«, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 116 (3/2017), str. 581–604.

Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, New York, Macmillan, 1993.

Lacan, Jacques, Televizija, prev. A. Zupančič, Ljubljana, DTP, 1993.

Lacan, Jacques, The Seminar, Book I, Freud’s Papers on Technique, 1953–1954, ur. J.-A. Miller, New York, W.W. Norton in Company, 1991.

Lacan, Jacques, Etika psihoanalize, prev. E. D. Bahovec in drugi, Ljubljana, Delavska enotnost, 1988.

Lacan, Jacques, »Kant s Sadom«, prev. S. Pelko, v Spisi, Ljubljana, DTP, 1994, str. 243–270.

Lacan, Jacques, Hrbtna stran psihoanalize, prev. A. Zupančič, S. Tomšič in A. Žerjav, Ljubljana, DTP, 2008.

Leib, Jonathan in Webster, Gerard, »On Remembering John Winberry and the Study of Confederate Monuments on the Southern Landscape?, Southeastern Geographer, 55 (1/2015), str. 9–18.

Miller, Jacques-Allan, »Extimité«, Prose Studies, 11 (3/1998).

Nedoh, Boštjan »Nadjaz in užitek transgresije: od Hanka Voighta do kapitolskega bizona «, Problemi, 59 (9-10/2021), (v tisku).

Nasar, Saima, »Remembering Edward Colston: histories of slavery, memory, and black globality«, Women’s History Review, 29 (7/2020), str. 1218–1225.

Newman, Saul, From Bakunin to Lacan: an Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power, Lanham, Lexington Books, 2001.

Okundaye, Jason, »What Starmer Should Have Said About the Colston Statue«, Tribune, 6. junij 2020, https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/06/what-keir-starmer-should-have-said-about-the-colston-statue.

Seshadri-Crooks, Kaplana, Desiring Whiteness: A Lacanian Analysis of Race, London in New York, Routledge, 2000.

Stewart, Heather in Proctor, Kate, »Labour’s left uneasy with leader's view on tearing down Colston statue«, The Guardian, 8. junij 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/08/labour-left-uneasy-with-leaders-view-on-tearingdown-colston-statue.

Syal, Rajeev, »Priti Patel to enable police to stop disruptive protesters going to demos«, The Guardian, 5. oktober 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/oct/05/priti-patel-to-enable-police-to-stop-disruptive-protesters-going-to-demos.

Šumič-Riha, Jelica, Avtoriteta in argumentacija, Ljubljana, DTP, 1995.

Westwater, Hannah, »How Priti Patel’s new policing bill threatens your right to protest«, The Big Issue, 13. september 2021, https://www.bigissue.com/news/activism/how-priti-patels-new-policing-bill-threatens-your-right-to-protest/.

Winberry, John, »Symbols in the landscape: The Confederate memorial«, Pioneer America Society Transactions, 5 (1982), str. 9–15.

Zevnik, Andreja, »Post-Racial Society as Social Fantasy: Black Communities Trapped between Racism and a Struggle for Political Recognition«, Political Psychology, 38 (4/2017), str. 621–635.

Zevnik, Andreja in Russell, Andrew, »The problem of asymmetric representation: The marginalisation, racialisation, and deservedness of Roma in Slovenia«, Politics (2021).

Zupančič, Alenka, »The Subject of the Law,« v Cogito and the Unconscious, ur. Slavoj Žižek, Durham, Duke University Press, 1998.

Zupančič, Alenka, Ethics of the Real: Kant and Lacan, London in New York, Verso, 2011.

Zupančič, Alenka, »Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself?!«, Problemi International, 3 (3/2019), str. 89–108, https://problemi.si/issues/p2019-3/05problemi_international_2019_3_zupancic.pdf.

Žižek, Slavoj, The Sublime Object of Ideology, London in New York, Verso, 1992.

Žižek, Slavoj, »Superego by Default«, Cardozo Law Review, 16 (3-4/1995), str. 925–942.

Žižek, Slavoj, The Indivisible Remainder, London in New York, Verso, 1996.

Žižek, Slavoj, The Ticklish Subject: the Absent Centre of Political Ontology, London in New York, Verso, 2000.

Žižek, Slavoj, For They Don’t Know What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor, London in New York, Verso, 2002.

Žižek, Slavoj, Enjoy your symptom! Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out, London in New York, Routledge, 2008.

Prenosi

Objavljeno

2021-12-31

Verzije

Kako citirati

Zevnik, A. (2021). Politika perverzije: rasizirana razlika in skupno dobro. Filozofski Vestnik, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.42.3.10