Politics of Perversion: Racialised Difference and Common Good

Authors

  • Andreja Zevnik University of Manchester, Združeno kraljestvo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.42.3.10

Keywords:

perversion, jouissance, anti-racist protest, political statues, race

Abstract

When anti-racist protestors toppled the statue of Edward Colston in Bristol in June 2020, British political elites across the left-rights spectrum, despite acknowledging that a statue of a slave trader has no place in the contemporary politics, called to firm the application of law and order. Through the example of Edward Colston, the essay examines what Lacan’s idea of perversion can reveal about the power relations between political elites and anti-racist protestors. It opens by discussing the impossibility of ethics in political contexts, before turning to the question of jouissance and its role in the creation of a racialised other and political institutions (and myths of white supremacy). If jouissance of the other racialises the other as deviant, pervert’s jouissance is de-personalised and made to follow “a greater good”. In doing so, the essay argues that perversion reveals the logics of racial hierarchies, which underpin and maintain modern society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, Sara, »A phenomenology of whiteness«, Feminist Theory, 8 (2/2007), str. 149–168.

Badiou, Alain, Ethics: an essay of the understanding of evil, London in New York, Verso, 2013.

Choksey, Lara, »Colston Falling«, Journal of Historical Geography (2020), DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2020.07.007.

Dolar, Mladen, »Onstran interpelacije«, v Razpol 4 (1988), str. 265–274.

Eyres, Zosia in PA, »Prime Minister Boris Johnsonʼs reaction to Edward Colston statue being torn down«, Bristol Post, 8. junij 2020, https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/prime-minister-boris-johnsons-reaction-4204340.

Freud, Sigmund, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, New York, W.W. Norton, 1990.

Hesse, Barnor, »White Sovereignty (…), Black Life Politics: ‘The N****t They Couldnʼt Killʼ«, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 116 (3/2017), str. 581–604.

Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason, New York, Macmillan, 1993.

Lacan, Jacques, Televizija, prev. A. Zupančič, Ljubljana, DTP, 1993.

Lacan, Jacques, The Seminar, Book I, Freud’s Papers on Technique, 1953–1954, ur. J.-A. Miller, New York, W.W. Norton in Company, 1991.

Lacan, Jacques, Etika psihoanalize, prev. E. D. Bahovec in drugi, Ljubljana, Delavska enotnost, 1988.

Lacan, Jacques, »Kant s Sadom«, prev. S. Pelko, v Spisi, Ljubljana, DTP, 1994, str. 243–270.

Lacan, Jacques, Hrbtna stran psihoanalize, prev. A. Zupančič, S. Tomšič in A. Žerjav, Ljubljana, DTP, 2008.

Leib, Jonathan in Webster, Gerard, »On Remembering John Winberry and the Study of Confederate Monuments on the Southern Landscape?, Southeastern Geographer, 55 (1/2015), str. 9–18.

Miller, Jacques-Allan, »Extimité«, Prose Studies, 11 (3/1998).

Nedoh, Boštjan »Nadjaz in užitek transgresije: od Hanka Voighta do kapitolskega bizona «, Problemi, 59 (9-10/2021), (v tisku).

Nasar, Saima, »Remembering Edward Colston: histories of slavery, memory, and black globality«, Women’s History Review, 29 (7/2020), str. 1218–1225.

Newman, Saul, From Bakunin to Lacan: an Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power, Lanham, Lexington Books, 2001.

Okundaye, Jason, »What Starmer Should Have Said About the Colston Statue«, Tribune, 6. junij 2020, https://tribunemag.co.uk/2020/06/what-keir-starmer-should-have-said-about-the-colston-statue.

Seshadri-Crooks, Kaplana, Desiring Whiteness: A Lacanian Analysis of Race, London in New York, Routledge, 2000.

Stewart, Heather in Proctor, Kate, »Labour’s left uneasy with leader's view on tearing down Colston statue«, The Guardian, 8. junij 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/08/labour-left-uneasy-with-leaders-view-on-tearingdown-colston-statue.

Syal, Rajeev, »Priti Patel to enable police to stop disruptive protesters going to demos«, The Guardian, 5. oktober 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/oct/05/priti-patel-to-enable-police-to-stop-disruptive-protesters-going-to-demos.

Šumič-Riha, Jelica, Avtoriteta in argumentacija, Ljubljana, DTP, 1995.

Westwater, Hannah, »How Priti Patel’s new policing bill threatens your right to protest«, The Big Issue, 13. september 2021, https://www.bigissue.com/news/activism/how-priti-patels-new-policing-bill-threatens-your-right-to-protest/.

Winberry, John, »Symbols in the landscape: The Confederate memorial«, Pioneer America Society Transactions, 5 (1982), str. 9–15.

Zevnik, Andreja, »Post-Racial Society as Social Fantasy: Black Communities Trapped between Racism and a Struggle for Political Recognition«, Political Psychology, 38 (4/2017), str. 621–635.

Zevnik, Andreja in Russell, Andrew, »The problem of asymmetric representation: The marginalisation, racialisation, and deservedness of Roma in Slovenia«, Politics (2021).

Zupančič, Alenka, »The Subject of the Law,« v Cogito and the Unconscious, ur. Slavoj Žižek, Durham, Duke University Press, 1998.

Zupančič, Alenka, Ethics of the Real: Kant and Lacan, London in New York, Verso, 2011.

Zupančič, Alenka, »Love Thy Neighbor as Thyself?!«, Problemi International, 3 (3/2019), str. 89–108, https://problemi.si/issues/p2019-3/05problemi_international_2019_3_zupancic.pdf.

Žižek, Slavoj, The Sublime Object of Ideology, London in New York, Verso, 1992.

Žižek, Slavoj, »Superego by Default«, Cardozo Law Review, 16 (3-4/1995), str. 925–942.

Žižek, Slavoj, The Indivisible Remainder, London in New York, Verso, 1996.

Žižek, Slavoj, The Ticklish Subject: the Absent Centre of Political Ontology, London in New York, Verso, 2000.

Žižek, Slavoj, For They Don’t Know What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor, London in New York, Verso, 2002.

Žižek, Slavoj, Enjoy your symptom! Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out, London in New York, Routledge, 2008.

Published

2021-12-31 — Updated on 2022-04-06

Versions

How to Cite

Zevnik, A. (2022). Politics of Perversion: Racialised Difference and Common Good. Filozofski Vestnik, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.42.3.10 (Original work published December 31, 2021)