Towards an Affective Understanding of Pure Judgments of Taste
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.45.1.08Keywords:
Kant, Arendt, natural humanity, moral humanity, policial/aesthetic humanity, pure judgement of taste, pleasure, desire, affectAbstract
In this article, we argue that “affect” should be an important notion in political philosophy. We do this, firstly, by tracing the notion of affect through the philosophical system of Immanuel Kant. We find that affect plays a threefold role for Kant, which can be mapped onto Hannah Arendt’s distinction between natural humanity, moral humanity, and political/aesthetic humanity (our rephrasing). Affect clearly plays a role on the level of natural humanity, and it is arguably to be pinpointed from within moral humanity. With regard to political/aesthetic humanity, we argue that in order to understand how pure judgments of taste can vouch for the ‘bridging’ of the gap between natural and moral humanity, an understanding of the role of aesthetic affection is essential. Secondly, we broaden the Kantian scope of affect by discussing how Žižek, in Lacan’s wake, has tried (but failed) to systematically examine the political relevance of pure judgments of taste. To understand how humans are able to come together politically, we need a better understanding of affect as that which allows pure form to effectuate a subjectively but universally shareable proclivity for (dis)pleasure and desire.
Downloads
References
Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Edited by Ronald Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Borges, Maria. “Emotion and the Beautiful in Art.” Con–Textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy 15 (2022): 263–71.
Frierson, Patrick. “Affects and Passions.” In Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide, edited by Alix Cohen, 94–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Gardner, Sebastian. “Kant’s Third Critique: The Project of Unification.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 78 (July 2016): 161–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246116000254.
Godess–Riccitelli, Moran. “The Cipher of Nature in Kant’s Third Critique: How to Represent Natural Beauty as Meaningful?” Con–textos Kantianos: International Journal of Philosophy 12 (2020): 338–57.
Guyer, Paul, and Allen Wood. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Immanuel Kant, Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood, xiii-lii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Haeck, Levi. “Immanuel Kants transcendentale logica: Singulier, algemeen, heterogeen.” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 83, no. 2 (2021): 217–48.
Haeck, Levi, and Gertrudis Van de Vijver. “Canguilhem’s Divided Subject: A Kantian Perspective on the Intertwinement of Logic and Life.” In Canguilhem and Continental Philosophy of Biology, edited by Giuseppe Bianco, Charles Wolfe and Gertrudis Van de Vijver, 123–46. Cham: Springer, 2023.
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Edited and translated by Robert Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Anthropology. Edited by Allen Wood and Robert Louden. Translated by Robert Clewis, Robert Louden, Felicitas G. Munzel, and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Riha, Rado. Kant in Lacan’scher Absicht: Die Kopernikanische Wende und das Reale. Vienna: Turia + Kant, 2018.
Vandenabeele, Bart. “The Subjective Universality of Aesthetic Judgements Revisited.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 48, no. 4 (October 2008): 410–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayn042.
Van de Vijver, Gertrudis. “Embarrassments of Knowledge. A Philosophical Comment On Lacan’s Formulae of Sexuation,” Psychoanalytische Perspectieven 41, no. 2 (2023): 171–86.
Van de Vijver, Gertrudis, Ariane Bazan, and Sandrine Detandt. “The Mark, the Thing, and the Object: On What Commands Repetition in Freud and Lacan.” Frontiers in Psychology 8, art. no. 2244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02244.
Van de Vijver, Gertrudis, and Eli Noé. “The Constraint is the Possibility: A Dynamical Perspective on Kant’s Theory of Objectivity.” Idealistic Studies 41, no. 1–2 (2011): 95–112.
Zupančič, Alenka. Ethics of the Real: Kant and Lacan. London: Verso, 2011.
Žižek, Slavoj. Tarrying with the Negative. Durham: Duke University Press, 1994.
Žižek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
