Attitudes and perceptions of local residents and tourists – a comparative study of the twin national parks of Aggtelek (Hungary) and Slovak Karst (Slovakia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v51i1.10683Keywords:
protected area, questionnaire, local people, world heritage, geotourism, motivationAbstract
National parks (NPs) are the flagships of protected areas, which primarily serve the protection of nature, but are also important sites for tourism. While karst areas are generally disadvantageous in terms of traditional farming, tourism can provide new livelihoods for those who live there. Therefore, it does matter how the local people relate to the NP and tourism, and the opinion of tourists is also an important factor. In this article, we present the results of a questionnaire survey conducted in the Aggtelek National Park (ANP) and the Slovak Karst National Park (SKNP). Our results show that for locals, the forest is the most important natural resource often visited by them, while for tourists, caves are the first choice. Conflicts between locals and tourists are negligible, and all actors agree to further increase tourism. In both ANP and SKNP, the majority of tourists and locals alike have a rather positive view of the NP. However, there is still a significant group of local residents who have a negative opinion about the NP. One reason for this may be that the locals feel they have only a marginal influence on NP decisions. The ANP plays a more important role in the lives of locals than in SKNP, because ANP has a larger organisational background and more human resources for a smaller population. Although geotourism is still largely missing from the vocabulary of local residents and park management alike, there is a small but significant part of visitors who consider themselves sensu lato geotourists. As for the motivation of tourists, the keyword is “cave”, while the content of the term “karst” is much less known for visitors (especially on the Hungarian side). In Hungary, the tourism to Baradla Cave is largely due to school education. We found that the internet, although one of the most important sources of information for visitors, was not the first port of call, and was not outstanding compared to other factors.
Downloads
References
Allan, M., Dowling, R.K., Sanders, D., 2015. The motivations for visiting geosites: the case of Crystal Cave, Western Australia. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 16 (2): 141–152.
Arnberger, A., Schoissengeier, R., 2012. The other side of the border: Austrian local residents’ attitudes towards the neighbouring Czech Šumava National Park. Journal for Nature Conservation, 20 (3): 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.01.005.
Božić, S., Tomić, N., 2015. Canyons and gorges as potential geotourism destinations in Serbia: comparative analysis from two perspectives–general geotourists’ and pure geotourists’. Open Geosciences, 7 (1): 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2015-0040.
Butler, R.W., Boyd, S.W. (Eds.), 2000. Tourism and national parks: issues and implications. Chichester: Wiley.
Cigna, A.A., Forti, P., 2013. Caves: the Most Important Geotouristic Feature in the World. Tourism and Karst Areas, 6 (1): 9–26.
Csüllög, G., Móga, J., 1997. Geomorphology and drainage of the S-Gömör-Torna karst region in view of an environmental hazard. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie, Supplementband, 110: 255–261.
Day, M., 2010. Human Interaction with Caribbean Karst Landscapes: Past, Present and Future. Acta Carsologica, 39 (1): 137–146. https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v39i1.119.
Dénes, G., 1998. Történeti áttekintés a XIX. század második feléig (Historical review up to the second half of 19th century). In Az Aggteleki Nemzeti Park (Aggtelek National Park), Baross, G. (Ed.), 333–377. 1st ed. Budapest: Mezőgazda Kiadó.
Dowling, R.K., 2011. Geotourism’s Global Growth. Geoheritage, 3 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7.
Frost, W., Hall, C.M., 2015. Tourism and national parks: international perspectives on development, histories and change. London: Routledge.
Gessert, A., 2016. Geomorphology of the Slovak Karst (Eastern Part). Journal of Maps, 12 (sup1): 285–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2016.1202874.
Gessert, A., Nestorová–Dická, J., Sninčák, I., 2018. The dynamics of tourist excursion ratios in Slovakia show caves from 2000 to 2014. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 118 (2): 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2018.1503552.
Getzner, M., 2010. Impacts of protected areas on regional sustainable development: the case of the Hohe Tauern national park (Austria). International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 2 (4): 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2010.035488.
Gordon, J.E., Crofts, R., Díaz-Martínez, E., Woo, K.S., 2018. Enhancing the Role of Geoconservation in Protected Area Management and Nature Conservation. Geoheritage, 10 (2): 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0240-5.
Gruber, P., Gaál, L., 2014. A Baradla-Domica-barlangrendszer: a barlang, amely összeköt. (Baradla-Domica-system - the cave, which connects us). Jósvafő: Aggteleki Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság.
Hall, C.M., Page, S.J., 2014. The Geography of Tourism and Recreation: Environment, Place and Space. 4th ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203796092.
Hall, D., Richards, G., 2000. Tourism and Sustainable Community Development. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
Hayes, T.M., 2006. Parks, People, and Forest Protection: An Institutional Assessment of the Effectiveness of Protected Areas. World Development, 34 (12): 2064–2075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.03.002.
Hose, T.A., 2008. Towards a history of geotourism: definitions, antecedents and the future. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 300 (1): 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP300.5.
Hutárová, D., Kozelová, I., Špulerová, J., 2021. Tourism Development Options in Marginal and Less-Favored Regions: A Case Study of Slovakia´s Gemer Region. Land, 10 (3): 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10030229.
IUCN, 2022: Protected Areas, Category II. National Park.- [Online] Available from https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/about/protected-areas-categories/category-ii-national-park [Accessed 14th January 2022]
Kalisch, D., Klaphake, A., 2008. The dilemma of recreational use versus nature protection – Responses from National Park authorities in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Management for Protection and Sustainable Development. The Fourth International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas, 404–408.
Karst and National Parks, 2022: Introduction.- [Online] Available from https://karst.elte.hu/knp/ [Accessed 14th January 2022]
Koderman, M., Opačić, V.T. (Eds.), 2020. Challenges of tourism development in protected areas of Croatia and Slovenia. Koper: University of Primorska Press and Croatian Geographical Society.
Korec, P., 2014. Lagging regions of Slovakia in the context of their competitiveness. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 25: 113–133.
Krpina, V., 2015. Analysis of the relation between visitors and protected natural areas in the Zadar County. Šumarski list, 139 (11–12): 535–551.
Leibert, T., 2013. The Peripheralization of Rural Areas in Post- socialist Central Europe: A Case of Fragmenting Development? Lessons from Rural Hungary. In Peripheralization: The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice, Fischer-Tahir, A., Naumann, M. (Eds.), 101–120. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19018-1_5.
McKercher, B., 1996. Differences between Tourism and Recreation in Parks. Annals of Tourism Research, 23 (3): 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(96)00002-3.
Mika, M., Zawilińska, B., Kubal-Czerwińska, M., 2019. Exploring the determinants of local people’s attitude towards national parks in Poland. Folia Geographica, 61 (1): 5–16.
Mose, I., 2007. Google-Books-ID: fl3dR_WiuKwC. Protected Areas and Regional Development in Europe: Towards a New Model for the 21st Century. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
Nestorová Dická, J., 2021. Demographic Changes in Slovak Roma Communities in the New Millennium. Sustainability, 13 (7): 3735. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073735.
Nestorová Dická, J., Gessert, A., Bryndzová, L., Telbisz, T., 2020. Behavioural Survey of Local Inhabitants’ Views and Attitudes about Slovak Karst National Park in Slovakia. Sustainability, 12 (23): 10029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310029.
Nestorová Dická, J.N., Gessert, A., Sninčák, I., 2019. Rural and non-rural municipalities in the Slovak Republic. Journal of Maps, 15 (1): 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2019.1615010.
Nolte, B., 2004. Sustainable tourism in biosphere reserves of East Central European countries–case studies from Slovakia, Hungary and the Czech Republic. Policies, Methods and Tools for Visitor Management, 2005: 349–356.
Papageorgiou, K., Kassioumis, K., 2005. The national park policy context in Greece: Park users’ perspectives of issues in park administration. Journal for Nature Conservation, 13 (4): 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2004.11.001.
Petrić, L., Mandić, A., 2014. Visitor management tools for protected areas focused on sustainable tourism development: the Croatian experience. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 13 (6): 1483–1495.
Ravbar, N., 2004. Drinking Water Supply from Karst Water Resources (The Example of the Kras Plateau, SW Slovenia). Acta Carsologica, 33 (1): 73–84. https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v33i1.316.
Reinius, S.W., Fredman, P., 2007. Protected areas as attractions. Annals of Tourism Research, 34 (4): 839–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2007.03.011.
Ritter, K., 2018. Special features and problems of rural society in Hungary. Studia Mundi - Economica, 5 (1): 98–112. https://doi.org/10.18531/Studia.Mundi.2018.05.01.98-112.
Štrba, Ľ., Kolačkovská, J., Kudelas, D., Kršák, B., Sidor, C., 2020. Geoheritage and Geotourism Contribution to Tourism Development in Protected Areas of Slovakia—Theoretical Considerations. Sustainability, 12 (7): 2979. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072979.
Šulc, I., Valjak, V., 2012. Zaštićena područja u funkciji održivog razvoja hrvatskog otočja–primjer otoka Mljeta. Croatian Geographical Bulletin, 74 (1): 161–185.
Tanács, E., Szmorad, F., Bárány-Kevei, I., 2007. A review of the forest management history and present state of the Haragistya karst plateau (Aggtelek Karst, Hungary). Acta Carsologica, 36 (3): 441–451.
Telbisz, T., 2011. Large-scale relief of the Slovak Karst and Aggtelek Karst (Gömör-Torna/Gemer-Turňa Karst) - a DEM-based study. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 60 (4): 379–396.
Telbisz, T., Bottlik, Z., Mari, L., Petrvalská, A., 2015. Exploring relationships between Karst terrains and social features by the example of Gömör-Torna Karst (Hungary-Slovakia). Acta Carsologica, 44 (1): 121–137. https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v44i1.1739.
Telbisz, T., Ćalić, J., Kovačević-Majkić, J., Milanović, R., Brankov, J., Micić, J., 2021. Karst Geoheritage of Tara National Park (Serbia) and Its Geotouristic Potential. Geoheritage, 13 (4): 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00612-5.
Telbisz, T., Gruber, P., Mari, L., Kőszegi, M., Bottlik, Z., Standovár, T., 2020. Geological Heritage, Geotourism and Local Development in Aggtelek National Park (NE Hungary). Geoheritage, 12 (1): 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00438-7.
Telbisz, T., Látos, T., Deák, M., Székely, B., Koma, Z., Standovár, T., 2016. The advantage of lidar digital terrain models in doline morphometry compared to topographic map based datasets - Aggtelek karst (Hungary) as an example. Acta Carsologica, 45 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.3986/ac.v45i1.4138.
Telbisz, T., Mari, L., 2020. The significance of karst areas in European national parks and geoparks. Open Geosciences, 12 (1): 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0008.
Trakolis, D., 2001. Perceptions, Preferences, and Reactions of Local Inhabitants in Vikos-Aoos National Park, Greece. Environmental Management, 28 (5): 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010251.
Veress, M., Unger, Z., 2015. Baradla-Domica: Large Cave System on the Hungarian-Slovak Border. In Landscapes and Landforms of Hungary, Lóczy, D. (Ed.), World Geomorphological Landscapes. 167–175. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08997-3_20.
Zámbó, L., Ford, D.C., 1997. Limestone dissolution processes in beke doline Aggtelek National Park, Hungary. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 22 (6): 531–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199706)22:6<531::AID-ESP711>3.0.CO;2-I.
Zawilińska, B., 2020. Residents’ Attitudes Towards a National Park Under Conditions of Suburbanisation and Tourism Pressure: A Case Study of Ojców National Park (Poland). European Countryside, 12 (1): 119–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2020-0007.
Zgłobicki, W., Baran-Zgłobicka, B., 2013. Geomorphological Heritage as a Tourist Attraction. A Case Study in Lubelskie Province, SE Poland. Geoheritage, 5 (2): 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-013-0076-6.
Zurc, J., Udovč, A., 2009. Local inhabitants’ opinion about the triglav national park management. Sociologija i prostor/Sociology & Space, 47: 43–56.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
