Interrelated aspects of residential suburbanization and collective quality of life: A case study in Czech suburbs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.909Keywords:
human geography, suburbanization, collective quality of life, community, suburbs of Olomouc, Czech RepublicAbstract
Most people moving to suburban municipalities seek to enhance their quality of life. However, residential suburbanization may contribute to spatial separation of the population and adversely affect the collective quality of life. This article focuses on socio-geographical aspects of quality of life in the context of suburbanization from a theoretical perspective and also based on a case study in the countryside around the Czech city of Olomouc. Due to the complex nature of this issue, a range of qualitatively oriented methods was applied in the municipalities most affected by residential suburbanization. The findings of the case study show that quality of life for people living in these suburbs is influenced by geographical conditions as well as relations within the community and residents’ participation in public life in the municipality.Downloads
References
Andráško, I. 2010: Potenciál priestorovej komplementarity – konceptualizácia a aplikácia (prípadová štúdia okresu Pezinok). Časoprostorové změny regionálních a krajinných struktur. Brno.
Andráško, I. 2009: The role and status of geography in the quality of life research. Geodny Liberec 2008: sborník příspěvků. Liberec.
Andráško, I. 2008: Hlavné komponenty spokojnosti s kvalitou životných podmienok v mestských štvrtiach Bratislavy. Změny regionálních struktur České republiky a Slovenské republiky. Brno.
Appleyard, D. 1973: Notes on urban perception and knowledge. Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behaviour. London.
Baldassare, M. 1992: Suburban communities. Annual review of sociology 18-1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002355
Biolek, J., Andráško, I. 2012: Rezidenční suburbanizace v zázemí největších měst Olomouckého kraje. Časoprostorové změny regionálních struktur ČR a SR. Brno.
Biolek, J., Andráško, I. 2011: Rezidenční suburbanizace v ČR a její společenské dopady. Časovo-priestorové aspekty regionálnych štruktúr ČR a SR. Bratislava.
Bowling, A. 1995: What things are important in people’s lives? A survey of the public judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life. Social science & medicine 41-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00113-L
Brabec, T., Sýkora L. 2009: Gated communities in Prague. Gated and guarded housing in Eastern Europe. Forum IFL 11. Leipzig.
Burian, J., Miřijovský, J., Macková, M. 2011: Suburbanizace Olomouce – hodnocení pomocí analýzy statistický dat. Urbanismus a územní rozvoj 14-5.
Cicognani, E. Pirini, C., Keyes, C., Joshanloo, M., Rostami, R., Nosratabadi, M. 2008: Social participation, sense of community and social well-being: A study of American, Italian and Iranian University students. Social indicators research 89-1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9222-3
Cloke, P. Cook, I., Crang, P., Goodwin, M., Painter, J., Philo, C. 2004: Practising human geography. London.
Couch, Ch. Petschel-Held, G., Leontidou, L. 2007: Urban sprawl in Europe. Landscapes, land-change and policy. Oxford.
EEA 2006: Urban sprawl in Europe: The ignored challenge. Copenhagen.
Felce, D., Perry, J. 1995: Quality of life. Its definition and measurement. Research in development disabilities 16-1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8
Fishman, R. 1989: Bourgeois utopias: The rise and fall of suburbia. New York.
Galčanová, L., Vacková, B. 2008: Rezidenční suburbanizace v postkomunistické České republice, její kořeny, tradice a současnost. IVRIS Papers 3-2.
Gašperič, P. 2004: The expansion of Ljubljana onto the Ljubljansko Barje Moor. Acta geographica Slovenica 44-2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3986/AGS44201
Harris, R., Larkham, P. J. 1999: Changing suburbs. Foundation, form and function. London.
Jackson, K. T. 1985: Crabgrass frontier: the suburbanization of the United States. Oxford.
Jensen, M. J., Leven, C. L. 1997: Quality of life in central cities and suburbs. Annals of regional science 31-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001680050057
Kok, H. 1999: Migration from the city to the countryside in Hungary and Poland. Geojournal 49-1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007092228633
Kahn, M. E. 2000: Environmental impact of suburbanization. Journal of policy analysis and management 19-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<569::AID-PAM3>3.0.CO;2-P
Kontuly, T., Tammaru, T. 2006: Population subgroups responsible for new urbanisation and suburbanisation in Estonia. European urban and regional studies 13-4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969776406065435
Krisjane Z., Berzins, M. 2012: Post-socialist urban trends: new patterns and motivations for migration in the suburban areas of Rīga, Latvia. Urban studies 49-2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098011402232
Latour, B. 2005: Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford.
Lynch, K. 1960: The image of the city. Cambridge.
Massam, B. H. 1999: The Classification of quality of life using multi-criteria analysis. Journal of geographic information and decision analysis 3-2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(02)00023-5
Pacione, M. 2003: Urban environmental quality and human well-being – a social geographical perspective. Landscape and urban planning 65, 1-2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00234-7
Phillips, D. 2006: Quality of life. Concept, policy and practice. Oxon.
Potočný, T. 2006: Lidé na okraji. Případová studie satelitního městečka. IVRIS Papers 1.
Putnam, R. 2001: Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York.
Newman, P., Kenworthy, J. 1999: Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC.
Raphael, D., Renwick, R., Brown, I., Steinmetz, B., Sehdev, H., Phillips, S. 2001: Making the links between community structure and individual well-being: community quality of life in Riverdale, Toronto, Canada.
Health & Place 7-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1353-8292(01)00008-9
Ravbar, M. 1997: Slovene cities and suburbs in transformation. Geografski zbornik 37.
Rowland, J., Mitchell, C. 2012: The quality of life in cities: the twenty-first century suburb. Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers: urban design and planning 165-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/udap.11.00015
Sýkora L., Ouředníček, M. 2001: Sprawling post-communist metropolis: commercial and residential suburbanisation in Prague and Brno, the Czech Republic. Internet: http://www.natur.cuni.cz/~slamak/gacr/selma.pdf (19. 6. 2014). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5762-5_8
Šafr, J., Bayer, I., Sedláčková, M. 2008: Sociální koheze. Teorie, koncepty a analytická východiska. Sociologický časopis 44-2.
Tuan, Y.-F. 1975: Images and mental maps. Annals of the Association of American geographers 65-2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1975.tb01031.x
Van Kamp, I. Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., de Hollander, A. 2003: Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and urban planning 65, 1-2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00232-3
Wellman, B., Leighton, B. 1979: Networks, neighborhoods, and communities: approaches to the study of the community question. Urban affairs review 14-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107808747901400305
Wilkinson, K. P. 1991: The community in rural America. London.
Yin, R. 1984: Case study research: design and methods. Newbury Park.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.