Quantitative analysis of marginalization indicators – example of the peninsula of Pelješac, Croatia

Authors

  • Silvija Šiljeg prof. assistant Silvija Šiljeg (professor geografije in sociologije) Sveučilište u Zadru Odjel za geografiju Trg Kneza Višeslava 9 23000 Zadar, Hrvaška
  • Ante Šiljeg dr.sc. Ante Šiljeg (professor geografije inzgodovine), docent Sveučilište u Zadru Odjel za geografiju Trg Kneza Višeslava 9 23000 Zadar, Hrvaška
  • Nikola Glamuzina Sveučilište u Splitu Filozofski fakultet Sinjska 2 21000 Split, Hrvaška

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.732

Keywords:

geography, marginalization, Pelješac, Croatia, indicators, GIS

Abstract

Besides marginalization on the international, national and regional levels, it is possible to speak about marginalization on the local level. It is especially important since its consequences and various aspects are felt in everyday life. This paper presents the results of quantitative analysis of the process of marginalization on the local level on the example of the peninsula of Pelješac in Croatian Littoral. The main aim of the research is to contribute to propose a quantitative approach in the research of marginalization. The authors have defined four indicators which form the basis of the GIS analysis: demographic, socio-economic, educational and an indicator of physical marginalization. In order to see relationship between the indicators, the peninsula has been divided into zones which differ according to the marginalization process. Such differences are expressed quantitatively in form of an index of marginalization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anselin, L. 1988: Spatial econometrics – methods and models (studies in operational regional science). Dordrecht.

Anselin, L. 1995: Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geographical analysis 27-2.

Barković, D. 2009: Otkrivanje prostorne autokorelacije pomoću lokalnih indikatora. Ekonomski Vjesnik/Econviews: Review of contemporary business, entrepreneurship and economic issues 22-1.

Conradson, D., Pawson, E. 2009: New cultural economies of marginality: revisiting the West Coast, South Island, New Zealand. Journal of rural studies 25-1.

Cullen, B.T., Pretes, M. 2000: The meaning of marginality: interpretations and perceptions in social science. The social science journal 37-2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(00)00056-2

De Koninck, R. 1980: Les pieds, la tête et la géographie. Notes sur la fonction organique d'une discipline académique. Implications 1.

Déry, S., Leimgruber, W., Zsilincsar, W. 2012: Understanding marginality: recent insights from a geographical perpective. Hrvatski geografski glasnik 74-1.

Getis, A., Ord J. K., 1992: The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical analysis 24-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x

Getis, A. 2010: Spatial autocorrelation. Handbook of applied spatial analysis: software tools, methods and applications. Berlin – Heidelberg.

Glamuzina, N. 2009: Pelješac. Split.

Griffith, D. A. 2009: Spatial autocorrelation. Amsterdam.

Haining, R. 2004: Spatial data analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge.

Huskey, L., Morehouse, T. A. 1992: Development in remote regions: What do we know?, Arctic 45-2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14430/arctic1384

Internet 1: http://www.viamichelin.com/(3.9.2013)

Jenks, G. F. 1967: The data model concept in statistical mapping. International yearbook of cartography 7.

Jones, G., Leimgruber, W., Nel, E. 2007: Issues in geographical marginality. Grahamstown.

Jussila, H., Leimgruber, W., Majoral, R. 1998: Perceptions of marginality: theoretical issues and regional perceptions of marginality in geographical space. Aldershot.

Jussila, H., Majoral, R., Cullen, B. 2002: Sustainable development and geographical space. Issues of population, environment, globalization and education in marginal regions. Aldershot.

Jussila, H., Majoral, R., Delgado Cravidăo, F. 2001: Globalization and marginality in geographical space. Political, economic and social issues of development in the new millennium. Aldershot.

Leimgruber W., Majoral R., Lee C.-W. 2003: Policies and strategies in marginal regions. Ashgate.

Leimgruber, W. 2004: Between global and local: marginality and marginal regions in the context of globalization and deregulation. Aldershot.

Leimgruber, W., Nel, E., Matsuo, Y., Binns, T., Chand, R., Cullen, B., Lynch, D., Pradhan, P. K. 2010: Geographical Marginality as a global issue. Dunedin.

Majoral R., Jussila H., Delgado Cravidăo 2000: Environment and marginality in geographical space. Political, economic and social issues of development in the new millennium. Ashgate.

Nel, E., Stevenson, T. 2011: Small town New Zealand: reflections on local responses to geographical marginalization. Mountain regions in transformation: global processes, regional and local impacts and responses. Proceedings of the 2010 conference in Graz and Fribourg. Aachen.

Park, R. E. 1928: Human migration and the marginal man. American journal of sociology 33.

Sancho-Reinoso, A. 2011: Understanding marginal region through landscape change – an example from the Catalan Pre-Pyrenees. Mountain regions in transformation: global processes, regional and local impacts and responses. Proceedings of the 2010 Conference in Graz and Fribourg Aachen.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Croatia. 2001a: Popis stanovništva, kućanstava i stanova 2001. Kontingenti stanovništva, po naseljima. Državni zavod za statistiku. Zagreb, 2001.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Croatia. 2001b: Popis stanovništva, kućanstava i stanova 2001, Odsutno stanovništvo iz naselja popisa prema vremenu i razlogu odsutnosti, po naseljima. Državni zavod za statistiku. Zagreb, 2001.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Croatia. 2001c: Popis stanovništva, kućanstava i stanova 2001, Poljoprivredno stanovništvo prema aktivnosti i spolu, po naseljima. Državni zavod za statistiku. Zagreb, 2001.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Croatia. 2001d: Popis stanovništva, kućanstava i stanova 2001, Stanovništvo prema pohađanju škole, po naseljima. Državni zavod za statistiku. Zagreb, 2001.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Croatia. 2001e: Popis stanovništva, kućanstava i stanova 2001, Stanovništvo prema spolu i starosti, po naseljima 2001. Državni zavod za statistiku. Zagreb, 2001.

Stonequist, E. V. 1937: The marginal man. New York.

Valença, M., Nel, E., Leimgruber, W., 2008: The global challenge and marginality. New York.

Vant, A. 1986: Marginalité sociale. Marginalité spatiale. Paris.

Worboys, M., Duckham, M. 2004: GIS: a computing perspective. Boca Raton.

Downloads

Published

17-02-2016

How to Cite

Šiljeg, S., Šiljeg, A., & Glamuzina, N. (2016). Quantitative analysis of marginalization indicators – example of the peninsula of Pelješac, Croatia. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 56(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.732