Immigrant integration regimes in Europe: Incorporating the Western Balkan countries

  • Vesna Lukić Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade
  • Aleksandar Tomašević University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Sociology, Novi Sad
Keywords: immigration, integration policy, Migrant Integration Policy Index, latent class analysis, Europe


This article discusses immigrant integration policies in Europe. We analyzed data from the 2015 Migration Integration Policy Index to identify similar immigrant integration regimes in Europe according to policy priorities related to immigrants’ socioeconomic rights. The results of a latent class analysis demonstrated that there are two immigrant integration policy regimes among the EU 28, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Macedonia, and Serbia, with variation between the old EU member states since 1995 (without Greece) and Estonia versus the new EU member states since 2004 (without Estonia), Greece, and the Western Balkan countries. Based on our classification, we conclude that there is a trend of convergence in integration policy regimes in Europe, in which the effects of spatial/geographical and temporal dimensions are manifested.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aleksandar Tomašević, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Sociology, Novi Sad

Department of Sociology


Beine, M., Boucher, A., Burgoon, B., Crock, M., Gest, J., Hiscox, M., McGovern, P., Rapoport, H., Schaper, J., Thielemann, E. 2016: Comparing immigration policies: An overview from the IMPALA database. International Migration Review 50-4. DOI:

Appave, G., Laczko, F. 2011: World migration report 2011. Geneva. Internet: (5. 12. 2019).

Bjerre, L., Helbling, M., Römer, F., Zobel, M. 2014: Conceptualizing and measuring immigration policies: A comparative perspective. International Migration Review 49-3. DOI:

Bommes, M., Thränhardt, D. 2010: Introduction: national paradigms of migration research. National paradigms of migration research. Osnabrück.

Boucher, A., Gest, J. 2014: Migration studies at crossroads: A critique of immigration regime typologies. Migration Studies 3-2. DOI:

Brubaker, R. 1992: Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge.

Callens, M. S., Meuleman, B. 2016: Do integration policies relate to economic and cultural threat perceptions? A comparative study in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 58-5. DOI:

Castles, S. 1995: How nation-states respond to immigration and ethnic diversity. New Community 21-3. DOI:

Choquet, S. 2017: Models of integration in Europe. European issues 449.

Council of the European Union, 2004: Common basic principles for immigrant integration policy in the European Union, 14615/04. Internet: (30. 8. 2018).

Council of the European Union, 2008: European pact on immigration and asylum. Internet: (3. 12. 2018).

Czaika, M., de Haas H. 2013: The effectiveness of immigration policies. Population and Development Review 39-3. DOI:

de Haas, H., Natter, K., Vezzoli, S. 2015: Conceptualizing and measuring migration policy change. Comparative Migration Studies. DOI:

de Haas, H., Natter, K., Vezzoli, S. 2018: Growing restrictiveness or changing selection? The nature and evolution of migration policies. International Migration Review 52-2. DOI:

Doomernik, J., Bruquetas-Callejo, M. 2015: National immigration and integration policies in Europe since 1973. Integration processes and policies in Europe: Contexts, levels, actors. Dordrecht.

Drew, A. L., Lewis, J. B. 2011: poLCA: An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 42-10. DOI:

Entzinger, H., Biezefeld, R. 2003: Benchmarking in immigrant integration. Rotterdam.

Finotelli, C., Michalowski, I. 2012: The heuristic potential of models of citizenship and immigrant integration reviewed. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 10-3. DOI:

Garibay, M. G., Cuyper, P., 2013: The evaluation of integration policies across the OECD: a review. Antwerpen.

Gregurović, S., Župarić-Iljić, D. 2018: Comparing the incomparable? Migrant integration policies and perplexities of comparison. International Migration 56-3. DOI:

Grzymala-Kazlowska, A., Phillimore J. 2018: Introduction: rethinking integration. New perspectives on adaptation and settlement in the era of super-diversity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44-2. DOI:

Hagenaars, J. A., McCutcheon, A. L. 2002. Applied Latent Class Analysis. New York.

Hardwick, S. 2008: Place, space and pattern: Geographical theories in international migration. Migration theory: Talking across disciplines. New York.

Helbling, M., Reeskens, T., Stark, C., Stolle, D., Wright, M. 2016: Enabling immigrant participation: Do integration regimes make a difference? Just ordinary citizens? Towards a comparative portrait of the political immigrant. Toronto.

Huddleston, T. 2016: A regional MIPEX assessment of the Western Balkans. Internet: (27. 10. 2018).

Huddleston, T., Bilgili, Ö., Joki, A-L., Vankova, Z. 2015: Migrant Integration Policy Index 2015. Barcelona, Brussels. Internet: (13. 8. 2018).

Joppke, C. 2007: Immigrants and civic integration in Western Europe. Belonging? Diversity, recognition and shared citizenship in Canada. Internet: (5. 12. 2019).

Josipovič, D., Repolusk, P. 2003: Demographic characteristics of the Romany in Prekmurje. Acta Geographica Slovenica 43-1. DOI:

Knill, C., Lehmkuhl, D. 2002: The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research 41-2. DOI:

Lozano, A. A., García-González, N., Sebastiani, L., Veinguer, A. A., Araujo, S. G. 2014: Revisiting the European Union framework on immigrant integration: The European integration forum as a technology of agency. Ethnicities 14-4. DOI:

Lukić, V. 2018: Od imigracije do integracije: Možemo li da učimo od zemalja sa razvijenim politikama integracije migranata? [From immigration to integration - can we learn from countries with elaborated immigrant integration policies?] Zbornik matice srpske za društvene nauke 167. DOI:

Martiniello, M. 2006: Towards a coherent approach to immigrant integration policy(ies) in the European Union. Internet: (13. 8. 2018).

Melegh, A., Gruber, K., Fassmann, H., Musil, E., Bauer, R., 2014: Longer-term demographic dynamics in South–East Europe: Convergent, divergent and delayed development paths. Central and Eastern European Migration Review 3-2.

Meuleman, B., Reeskens, T. 2008: The relation between integration policy and majority attitudes toward immigration. An empirical test across European countries. Symposium of International Society of Political Psychology. 29th May 2008, Leuven.

Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B. O. 2007: Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14-4. DOI:

Pajnik, M. 2007: Integration policies in migration between nationalising states and transnational citizenship, with reference to the Slovenian case. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33-5. DOI:

Parkes, R. 2008: Immigrant integration meets European integration. Berlin. Internet: (13. 8. 2018).

Penninx, R., Garcés-Mascareñas, B. 2015: The concept of integration as an analytical tool and as a policy concept. Integration processes and policies in Europe: Contexts, levels, actors. Dordrecht.

Vertovec, S. 2007: Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30-6. DOI:

Zamfir, A. M., Mocanu, C., Maer-Matei, M., Lungu, E. O. 2014: Immigration and integration regimes in EU countries. Journal of Community Positive Practices 14-1.

How to Cite
Lukić V, Tomašević A. Immigrant integration regimes in Europe: Incorporating the Western Balkan countries. AGS [Internet]. 2020May26 [cited 2020Jul.10];60(1):143–153. Available from: