Farm holdings and the owner’s residence location in the aspect of direct payments from the EU: A case study in nine regions in Poland

Keywords: rural area, land spatial structure, area-based payments, cross-compliance monitoring, Common Agricultural Policy, Poland

Abstract

Instruments promoting rural development have been implemented by many countries. Areabased payments for farmers allocated under the Common Agricultural Policy constitute one of such instruments in the European Union. The support system for rural areas, including the size of the declared reference parcels, is monitored as part of the cross-compliance mechanism. Parcels with unfavorable landuse patterns are more difficult to farm. According to estimates, more than 30% of agricultural farms in Poland fall into this category. This study proposes a universal algorithm for controlling the information submitted by farmers in payment applications. More than 76,000 applications were analyzed, and farms with the defective spatial structure of land were randomly selected. The results show that most errors occur in the case of land parcels situated the farthest from a farm holding (declared in the application), but the analysis revealed no strong correlation in this respect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARMiR 2017: Sprawozdania z działalności ARiMR 2008-2017. Internet: http://www.arimr.gov.pl (20. 5. 2018).

Bański, J. 1999: Obszary problemowe w rolnictwie Polski. Geographical Studies 172.

Bański, J. 2011: Changes in agricultural land ownership in Poland in the period of the market economy. Agricultural Economics 57-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/18/2010-AGRICECON

Demetriou, D. 2014: The development of an Integrated Planning and Decision Support System (IPDSS) for Land Consolidation. Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02347-2

Demetriou, D., Stillwell, J., See, L. 2012: Land consolidation in Cyprus: Why is an Integrated Planning and Decision Support System required? Land Use Policy 29-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.05.012

European court of auditors 2016: The Land Parcel Identification System: A useful tool to determine the eligibility of agricultural land – but its management could be further improved. Special report 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2865/1733

EC, 2009. Council Regulation (EC) No. 73/2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No. 1290/2005, (EC) No. 247/2006, (EC) No. 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003

Grandgirard, D., Zielinski, R. 2008: Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) Anomalies’ Sampling and Spatial Pattern. Towards convergence of ecological methodologies and GIS technologies. European Commission, Joint Research Centre Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen. Luxembourg.

Harasimowicz, S., Janus, J., Ostragowska, B. 2009: Optymalizacja przydziału gruntów do gospodarstw i jej powiązanie ze strefami różnic odległości z siedlisk do działek. Infrastruktura i ekologia terenów wiejskich 5.

Hendricks, A., Lisec, A. 2014: Komasacije pri velikih infrastrukturnih projektih v Nemčiji. Geodetski vestnik 58-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2014.01.046-068

Inan, H. I., Cete, M. 2007: Evaluation of land parcel identification systems. Strategic Integration of Surveying Services FIG Working Week 13.-17. May 2007 Hong Kong. China.

Inan, H. I., Sagris, V., Devos, W., Milenov, P., van Oosterom, P., Zevenbergen, J. 2010: Data model for the collaboration between land administration systems and agricultural land parcel identification systems. Journal of Environmental Management 91-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.030

Janković, N., Govedarica, M., Navratil, G., Fogliaroni, P. 2018: Domain model of an agricultural information system based on standards. Geodetski vestnik 62-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2018.01.51-67

Janus, J. 2018: Measuring land fragmentation considering the shape of transportation network: A method to increase the accuracy of modeling the spatial structure of agriculture with case study in Poland. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.03.016

Janus, J., Mika, M., Leń, P., Siejka, M., Taszakowski, J. 2016: A new approach to calculate the land fragmentation indicators taking into account the adjacent plots. Survey Review 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2016.1210362

Kocur-Bera, K. 2016a: Kształtowanie bezpiecznej przestrzeni obszarów wiejskich w aspekcie występowania ekstremalnych zjawiska pogodowych. Olsztyn.

Kocur-Bera, K. 2016b: Determinants of agricultural land price in Poland - a case study covering a part of the Euroregion Baltic. Cahiers Agricultures 25-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2016013

Kocur-Bera, K. 2019: Data compatibility between the Land and Building Cadaster (LBC) and the Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) in the context of area-based payments: a case study in the Polish Region of Warmia and Mazury. Land Use Policy 80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.024

Kocur-Bera, K., Piórkowska, K. 2018: The role of the Land Administration System in the process of developing and updating the Land Parcel Identification System – a case study of high nature value farmland in north-eastern Poland. Geographic Information Systems Conference and Exhibition “GIS ODYSSEY 2018”, Italy 10th to 14th of September 2018. Perugia.

Kocur-Bera, K., Stachelek, M. 2019: Geo-Analysis of Compatibility Determinants for Data in the Land and Property Register (LPR). Geosciences 9-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9070303

Kozłowski, J. 2015: Obecna i perspektywiczna rola geodezji i kartografii w zaspokajaniu potrzeb innych sektorów administracji i gospodarki. Problematyka geodezyjna w sektorze rolnym. Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi. Materiały z posiedzenia Państwowej Rady Geodezyjnej i Kartograficznej. Warszawa.

Latruffe, L., Davidova, S. 2007: Common Agricultural Policy direct payments and distributional conflicts over rented land within corporate farms in the New Member States. Land Use Policy 24-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.06.003

Latruffe, L., Piet, L. 2014: Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? A case study from Brittany, France. Agricultural Systems 129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.005

Leń, P. 2018: An algorithm for selecting groups of factors for prioritization of land consolidation in rural areas. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.12.014

Leń, P., Noga, K. 2010: Analiza rozdrobnienia gruntów indywidualnych we wsiach powiatu Brzozów. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich 3.

Levavasseur, F., Martin, P., Bouty, C., Barbottin, A., Bretagnolle, V., Thérond, O., Scheurer, O., Piskiewicz, N. 2016: RPG Explorer: A new tool to ease the analysis of agricultural landscape dynamics with the Land Parcel Identification System. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.015

Mika, M. 2018: An analysis of possibilities for the establishment of a multipurpose and multidimensional cadaster in Poland. Land Use Policy 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.060

Milenov, P., Kay, S. 2006: Status of the implementation of LPIS in the EU Member States. Proceedings of the 12th MARS PAC Annual Conference. Toulouse.

Neupane, R. P. 2000: Prospects of Agroforestry promotion in the mountains of Nepal. Ph. D. thesis, Asian Institute of Technology. Bangkok.

Niroula, G., Thapa, G. 2005: Impacts and causes of land fragmentation, and lesson learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy 22-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.10.001

Noga, K., Król, Ż. 2016: The patchwork of land as a problem restricting the development of rural areas. Barometr Regionalny 14-3.

Noga, K., Sosnowski, Z., Balawejder, M., Matkowska, K., Mazur, A. 2018: Ocena przeprowadzonych scaleń i wymiany gruntów rolnych województwa podkarpackiego pod katem barier ograniczających ich realizację. Warszawa.

Noszczyk, T., Hernik, J. 2017: Potrzeba czynnego prowadzenia ewidencji gruntów i budynków. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14597/infraeco.2017.1.2.017

Nurm, K. 2015: Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Land grabbing - a warning for Europe and a threat to family farming’. Official Journal of the European Union C 242-15. Brussels.

Pradziadowicz, M. 2014: Control of the farms under the Rural Development Programme 2007–2013. Folia Pomeranae Universitatis Technologiae Stetinensis, Oeconomica 3.

Prus, B., Szylar, M. 2018: The analysis of settlement network’s dispersion using Ward’s taxonomy method, Survey Review. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2017.1418279

Regulation 2016: Act of April 14th 2016 o wstrzymaniu sprzedaży nieruchomości Zasobu Własności Rolnej Skarbu Państwa oraz o zmianie niektórych ustaw 585.

Sagris, V., Devos, W. 2008: LPIS core conceptual model: methodology for feature catalogue and application Schema. European Commission, Joint Research Centre Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen. Luxembourg.

Siejka, M., Ślusarski, M., Zygmunt, M. 2014: Verification technology for topological errors in official databases with case study in Poland. Survey Review 46-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270613Y.0000000054

Siejka, M., Ślusarski, Z., Mika, M. 2015: Legal and technical aspects of modernization of land and buildings cadastre in selected area. Reports of Geodesy and Geoinformatics 99-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rgg-2015-0011

Sikorska, A. 2008: Rynek ziemi rolnej stan i perspektywy. Analizy rynkowe. Warszawa.

Sobolewska-Mikulska, K. 2012: Możliwości wykorzystania scaleń infrastrukturalnych w procesie przebudowy struktury przestrzennej obszarów wiejskich. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich 1-2.

Tomlinson, S. J., Dragosits, U., Levy, P. E., Thomson, A. M., Moxley, J. 2018: Quantifying gross vs. net agricultural land use change in Great Britain using the Integrated Administration and Control System. Science of The Total Environment 628-629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.067

Van Dijk T. 2004: Land consolidation as Central Europe's Panacea reassessed. Proceedings of Symposium on Modern Land Consolidation, 10th and 11th September, 2004. Volvic.

van Dijk, T. 2003: Scenarios of Central European land fragmentation. Land Use Policy 20-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00082-0

Van Oosterom, P., Lemmen, C., Ingvarsson, T., van der Molen, P., Ploeger, H., Quak, W., Stoter, J., Zevenbergen, J. 2006: The Core Cadastral Domain Model. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems 30.

Villanueva, M. P., Colombo, S. 2017: Cost analysis of parcel fragmentation in agriculture: the case of traditional olive cultivation. Biosystems Engineering 164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.10.003

Vitikainen, A. 2004: An overview of land consolidation in Europe. Nordic Journal of Surveying Real Estate Research 1-1. DOI: https://journal.fi/njs/article/view/41504

Woch, F. 2001: Optymalne parametry rozłogu gruntów gospodarstw rodzinnych dla terenów wyżynnych Polski. Pamiętnik Puławski 127. Puławy.

Zadravec, M., Žalik, B. 2009: A geometric and topological system for supporting agricultural subsidies in Slovenia. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 69-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2009.07.010

Zimmermann, J., González, A., Jones, M. B, O’Brien, P., Stout, J. C., Green, S. 2016: Assessing land-use history for reporting on cropland dynamics—A comparison between the Land-Parcel Identification System and traditional inter-annual approaches. Land Use Policy 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.027

Zygmunt, M., Siejka, M., Ślusarski, M., Siejka, Z., Piech, I., Bacior, S. 2015: Database inconsistency errors correction, on example of LPIS databases in Poland. Survey Review 47-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/1752270614Y.0000000134

Published
2020-12-31
How to Cite
1.
Kocur-BeraK. Farm holdings and the owner’s residence location in the aspect of direct payments from the EU: A case study in nine regions in Poland. AGS [Internet]. 2020Dec.31 [cited 2021Mar.4];60(2):7-20. Available from: https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/ags/article/view/6836