Public perception of coastal zone environmental problems in the Samsun province, Turkey

Authors

  • Kemalettin Şahin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS49207

Keywords:

geography, coastal pollution, public perception, sewage, Samsun, Turkey

Abstract

During the past few decades, the Samsun coast has been subjected to various human impacts that have led to changes in the coastal zone of this the area. This paper is an attempt to understand and define how residents and beach users perceive coastal zone problems in Samsun province based on their perceptions. For this purpose, a questionnaire survey was conducted during the months of June and July in 2005 and 2006 on 500 residents and beach users at eight beaches along the 121-kilometer Samsun shoreline on the north side of Turkey. The questionnaire data was collected through a direct interview. Analysis of interview data reveals that the respondents perceive coastal seawater pollution (89%), beach pollution, the loss of beach plain (67%), and changes in land use (91%) as the main problems of the coastal zone. The main factors blamed for coastal seawater pollution are sewage (98%), industrial waste (74%), and waste oils discharged by ships (38%). It is clear from the results of the survey that residents and beach users are not sufficiently aware of the coastal zone problems. The most important recommendation for solving these problems is increasing environmental awareness. To this end, environmental education activities are necessary for the conservation of coastal zone ecosystems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baysan, K. S. 2001: Perceptions of the Environmental impacts of Tourism:a comparative study of the attitudes of German, Russian and Turkish tourists in Kemer, Antalya. Tourism Geographies 3. Oxford. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616680010030284

Buttimore, M. 2004: Environmental Awareness Survey. Report. İnternet:

http://www.hauraki-dc.govt.nz/documents/minutes/Committees/Planning_and_Finance/2004/June/EnvironAwareness.pdf (1. 6. 2004).

Daby, D., Turner, J., Jago, C. 2002: Microbial and nutrient pollution of coastal bathing waters in Mauritius. Environment International 27. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00109-X

Derraik, J. G. B. 2002: The pollution of marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Marine Pollution Bulletin 44. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00220-5

Edwin, E., Geldreich, E. E. 1975: Microbiological criteria concepts for coastal bathing waters. Ocean Management 2. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0302-184X(75)90003-7

Hartwig, E., Clemens, T., Heckroth, M. 2007: Plastic debris as nesting material in a Kittiwake-(Rissa tridactyla)-colony at the Jammerbugt, Northwest Denmark. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.01.027

Internet 1: http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do (24. 6. 2004).

Irtem, E., Kabdaslı, S., Azbar, N. 2005: Coastal Zone Problems and Environmental Strategies to be Implemented at Edremit Bay, Turkey. Environmental Management 36. Springer. New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0062-5

Kocasoy, G. 1989a: The relationship between coastal tourism, sea pollution and public health: A case study from Turkey. The Environmentalist 9. Springer. New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02241824

Kocasoy, G. 1989b: Method for Prediction of Extent of Microbial Pollution of Seawater and Carrying Capacity of Beaches. Environmental Management 13. New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01867680

Langford, I. H., Georgiou, S., Bateman, I. J., Day, R. J., Turner, R. K. 2000: Public Perceptions of Health Risks from Polluted Coastal Bathing Waters: A Mixed Methodological Analysis Using Cultural Theory. Risk Analysis 20. Oxford. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.205062

Malavasi, U. C. Malavasi, M. M. 2004: Awareness of a conservation unit: a Brazilian case study. Journal for Nature Conservation 12. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2003.08.004

Malin, M. A., Ensign, S. H., McIver, M. R., Shank, G. C., Fowler, P.K. 2001: Demographic, landscape, and meteorological factors controlling the microbial pollution of coastal waters. Hydrobiologia 460. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013169401211

Mcbride, G. B., Salmond, C. E., Bandaranayake, D. R., Turner, S. J., Lewıs, G. D., Till, D. G. 1998: Health effects of marine bathing in New Zealand. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 8. Abingdon. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09603129873462

Mensah, J. V. 1997: Causes and effects of coastal sand mining in Ghana. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 18. Oxford. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9493.00005

Morgan, R., Gatell, E., Junyent, R., Micallef, A., Özhan, E. Williams, A.T. 2000: An improved user-based beach climate index. Journal of Coastal Conservation 6. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02730466

Nelson, C., Botterill, D. 2002: Evaluating the contribution of beach quality awards to the local tourism industry in Wales—the Green Coast Award. Ocean & Coastal Management 45. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00053-4

Nişancı, A. 1989: An important periods towards the seasonal weather types in the Middle Black Sea Region. The Geographical Researchs, Atatürk Culture, Literature and History Higher Institution, Geography Science and Application Department I. Ankara.

Nordstrom, K. F., Mitteager, W. A. 2001: Perceptions of the value of natural and restored beach and dune characteristics by high school students in New Jersey, USA. Ocean & Coastal Management 44. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(01)00065-5

Pendleton, L. Martin, N., Webster, D. G. 2001: Public Perceptions of Environmental Quality:A Survey Study of Beach Use and Perceptions in Los Angeles County. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00131-X

Rosalind, M. R. 2000: Ecoepidemiology of the effects of pollution on reproduction and survival of early life stages in teleosts. Fish and Fisheries 1. Oxford. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00006.x

Santos, I. R., Friedrich, A. C., Kersanach, M. W., Fillmann, G. 2005: Influence of socio-economic characteristics of beach users on litter generation. Ocean & Coastal Management 48. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2005.08.006

Şahin, C. 2005a: The Physical Geography of Turkey, Gündüz Eğitim ve Yayıncılık. Ankara.

Şahin, K. 2005b: Ripple Marks formation and interaction with climatic parameters in the Black Sea coastal: Atakum (Samsun) sample. Turkish Geography Society 44. İstanbul.

Smrekar, A. 2006: From drawing cognitive maps to knowing the protection zones for drinking water resources. Acta geographica Slovenica 46-1. Ljubljana. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3986/AGS46101

Tudor, D. T., Williams, A. T. 2006: A rationale for beach selection by the public on the coast of Wales, UK. Area 38. Chicester. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00684.x

Tzatzanis, M., Wrbka, T., Sauberer, N. 2003: Landscape and vegetation responses to human impact in sandy coasts of Western Crete, Greece. Journal for Nature Conservation 11. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/1617-1381-00047

Uzun, A. 2005: Samsun İli Kıyılarında Antropojenik Değişmeler. Internet: http://www.eies.itu.edu.tr/TURQUA/pdf/turqua5/TurquaV_183-190_Uzun.pdf (16. 5. 2006).

Uzun, A. 2006: Samsun Deltaları ve Beklenen Değişmeler. Internet:

http://www.samsun.bel.tr/hizmet_birimleri/kulturwebsite/samsem2006/doc/031.pdf (3. 2. 2007).

Yalçıner, A. C., Gökdalay, M. 2000: Marine Parks for protection and tourism in Turkey. Journal of Coastal Conservation 6. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02730468

Williams, A. T., Tudor, D. T., Randerson, P. 2003: Beach Litter Sourcing in the Bristol Channel and Wales, U.K. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 143. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022808908500

Downloads

Published

15-12-2009

How to Cite

Şahin, K. (2009). Public perception of coastal zone environmental problems in the Samsun province, Turkey. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 49(2), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS49207

Issue

Section

Articles