Will farmers cooperate to conserve biodiversity? The use of collective bonus in the High Nature Value farmland in Slovenia

Tanja Šumrada; Emil Erjavec

doi:10.3986/AGS.11015

Authors

Tanja Šumrada University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1297-9108
Emil Erjavec University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS.11015

Keywords:

agri-environmental measures, collective bonus, spatial coordination, collaboration among farmers, grassland conservation, Common Agricultural Policy, Slovenia

Abstract

Nature conservation in farmland is often based on the wide adoption of suitable farming practices, which are effectively coordinated at the landscape level. However, more advanced policy approaches to spatial coordination often require cooperation between farmers. We use quantitative analysis of 521 surveyed farmers and qualitative thematic analysis of 123 interviews in Natura 2000 sites Haloze and Kras in Slovenia to explore farmers' preferences towards a collective bonus, which could stimulate higher adoption of grassland conservation schemes. Abandonment of farming, low interest in agri-environmental schemes and changes in social relations (individualisation of farming and distrust among actors) were identified as critical barriers to farmer cooperation in the context of agri-environmental policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acock, A. C. 2014: A gentle introduction to Stata. 4th ed. Texas.

Ansell, C., Gash, A. 2007: Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Batáry, P., Dicks, L. V., Kleijn, D., Sutherland, W. J. 2015: The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology 29-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12536

Braun, V., Clarke, V. 2006: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, X., Lupi, F., He, G., Liu, J. 2009: Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809980106

Donaldson, L., Wilson, R. J., Maclean, I. M. D. 2017: Old concepts, new challenges: adapting landscape-scale conservation to the twenty-first century. Biodiversity and Conservation 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1257-9

Erjavec, E., Šumrada, T., Juvančič, L., Rac, I., Cunder, T., Bedrač, M., Lovec, M. 2018: Vrednotenje slovenske kmetijske politike v obdobju 2015-2020: Raziskovalna podpora za strateško načrtovanje po letu 2020. Ljubljana.

European environment agency 2012: Updated high nature value farmland in Europe: An estimate of the distribution patterns on the basis of CORINE Land Cover 2006 and biodiversity data. Copenhagen.

European network for rural development 2019: RDP analysis: Support to environment and climate change. M10.1 Agri-environment-climate commitments. Brussels. Internet: https://ec.europa.eu/enrd/sites/default/files/rdp_analysis_m10-1.pdf (8. 5. 2023).

Franks, J. R., Emery, S. B. 2013: Incentivising collaborative conservation: Lessons from existing environmental Stewardship Scheme options. Land Use Policy 30-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.005

Gamero, A., Brotons, L., Brunner, A., Foppen, R., Fornasari, L., Gregory, R. D., Herrando, S. et al. 2017: Tracking progress toward EU biodiversity strategy targets: EU policy effects in preserving its common farmland birds. Conservation Letters 10-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12292

Jepsen, M. R., Kuemmerle, T., Müller, D., Erb, K., Verburg, P. H., Haberl, H., Vesterager, J. P. et al. 2015: Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010. Land Use Policy 49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.003

Jogan, N., Kaligarič, M., Leskovar, I., Seliškar, A., Dobravec, J. 2004: Habitatni tipi Slovenije. Tipologija. Ljubljana.

Kaligarič, M., Ivajnšič, D. 2014: Vanishing landscape of the “classic” Karst: Changed landscape identity and projections for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning 132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.004

Kirbiš, N., Čuš, J., Rode, J., Žogan Čokl, N., Klavž, D., Žvikart, M., Jelenko Turinek, I. et al. 2020: Analiza izvajanja ukrepov Programa upravljanja območij Natura 2000 2015-2020 za obdobje 2015-2019: Sektor kmetijstvo. Verzija 2.0. Ljubljana.

Kleijn, D., Baquero, R. A., Clough, Y., Díaz, M., Esteban, J., Fernández, F., Gabriel, D. et al. 2006: Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries: Biodiversity effects of European agri-environment schemes. Ecology Letters 9-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x

Kleijn, D., Rundlöf, M., Scheper, J., Smith, H. G., Tscharntke, T. 2011: Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.009

Kuhfuss, L., Begg, G., Flanigan, S., Hawes, C., Piras, S. 2019: Should agri-environmental schemes aim at coordinating farmers’ pro-environmental practices? A review of the literature. Proceedings of the 172nd EAAE Seminar ‘Agricultural policy for the environment or environmental policy for agriculture?’. Brussels. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.289774

Kuhfuss, L., Préget, R., Thoyer, S., Hanley, N. 2016: Nudging farmers to enrol land into agri-environmental schemes: the role of a collective bonus. European Review of Agricultural Economics 43-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbv031

Levers, C., Schneider, M., Prishchepov, A. V., Estel, S., Kuemmerle, T. 2018: Spatial variation in determinants of agricultural land abandonment in Europe. Science of The Total Environment 644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.326

Mamine, F., Fares, M., Minviel, J. J. 2020: Contract design for adoption of agrienvironmental practices: A meta-analysis of discrete choice experiments. Ecological Economics 176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106721

Nguyen, C., Latacz-Lohmann, U., Hanley, N., Schilizzi, S., Iftekhar, S. 2022: Spatial coordination incentives for landscape-scale environmental management: A sy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105936stematic review. Land Use Policy 114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105936

Organisation for economic co-operation and development 2013: Providing agri-environmental public goods through collective action. Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264197213-en

Organisation for economic co-operation and development 2015: Public goods and externalities: Agri-environmental policy measures in selected OECD countries. Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239821-en

Prager, K. 2015: Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.10.009

Reed, M. S., Moxey, A., Prager, K., Hanley, N., Skates, J., Bonn, A., Evans, C. D. et al. 2014: Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes. Ecosystem Services 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.008

Riley, M., Sangster, H., Smith, H., Chiverrell, R., Boyle, J. 2018: Will farmers work together for conservation? The potential limits of farmers’ cooperation in agri-environment measures. Land Use Policy 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.049

Slovenc, M. 2019: Can a “good farmer” and a “bad farmer” cooperate?: An examination of conventional and organic farmers’ perceptions of production and environmental protection. Intertwining of Diverse Minds in(to) Political Ecology: Scientific Texts of Doctoral Students Participating in the Summer School of Political Ecology. Ljubljana.

Slovenc, M., Erjavec, E. 2021: Cooperation among farmers through the lens of their future orientations: A case study from Slovenia. Anthropological Notebooks 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5789103

Šumrada, T., Erjavec, E. 2020: Zasnove kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov in njihove značilnosti. Acta agriculturae Slovenica 116-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2020.116.1.1775

Šumrada, T., Japelj, A., Verbič, M., Erjavec, E. 2022: Farmers’ preferences for result-based schemes for grassland conservation in Slovenia. Journal for Nature Conservation 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126143

Šumrada, T., Kmecl, P., Erjavec, E. 2021a: Do the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy funds negatively affect the diversity of farmland birds? Evidence from Slovenia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107200

Šumrada, T., Vreš, B., Čelik, T., Šilc, U., Rac, I., Udovč, A., Erjavec, E. 2021b: Are result-based schemes a superior approach to the conservation of High Nature Value grasslands? Evidence from Slovenia. Land Use Policy 111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105749

Sutcliffe, L. M. E., Batáry, P., Kormann, U., Báldi, A., Dicks, L. V., Herzon, I., Kleijn, D. et al. 2015: Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland. Diversity and Distributions 21-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12288

Valentinov, V. 2007: Why are cooperatives important in agriculture? An organizational economics perspective. Journal of Institutional Economics 3-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137406000555

Villamayor-Tomas, S., Sagebiel, J., Olschewski, R. 2019: Bringing the neighbors in: A choice experiment on the influence of coordination and social norms on farmers’ willingness to accept agro-environmental schemes across Europe. Land Use Policy 84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.006

Vlada Republike Slovenije 2015: Natura 2000. Management Programme (2015–2020). Ljubljana.

Žiberna, I. 2012: Spreminjanje rabe zemljišč v Halozah v obdobju med letoma 2000 in 2011. Geografski obzornik 59-1,2.

Žvikart, M. 2010: Uresničevanje varstvenih ciljev iz programa upravljanja območij Natura 2000 v kmetijski kulturni krajini. Varstvo narave 24-24.