Spominki na ljubezen daleč stran: vsakdanji predmeti z velikim pomenom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/dd.2023.1.04Ključne besede:
čustveni predmeti, zveze na daljavo, ljubezen, intimnost, abstraktna prisotnostPovzetek
Avtorica v članku raziskuje vlogo vsakdanjih predmetov v zvezah na daljavo, ki povezujejo dva geografsko oddaljena partnerja. Študija se osredotoča na zveze na daljavo v Evropi in temelji na intervjujih z ljudmi v tovrstnih odnosih. Avtorica obravnava eno izmed praks ustvarjanja partnerjeve abstraktne prisotnosti, imenovano prepoznavanje sentimentalne vrednosti predmetov. Kot del razvijanja in ohranjanja intimnosti v odnosu se predstavljanje partnerjeve prisotnosti krepi s čustvenimi predmeti. Članek prispeva k presečišču materialne kulture in študij mobilnosti z raziskovanjem vloge predmetov pri čustvenem povezovanju geografsko oddaljenih partnerjev.
Prenosi
Literatura
Afshar, Maryam (2014). Understanding possession attachment in the era of the internet of things: A comparative analysis of the nature, motivation and strength of attachment to material objects versus meta objects. PhD dissertation. Seattle: Washington State University.
Ahmed, Sara (1999). Home and away: Narratives of migration and estrangement. International Journal of Cultural Studies 2/3, 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/136787799900200303.
Ainsworth, Mary S. (1969). Object relations, dependency, and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant-mother relationship. Child Development 40/4, 969–1025.
Arditti, Joyce A., Kauffman, Melissa (2004). Staying Close When Apart: Intimacy and Meaning in Long-Distance Dating Relationships. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy 3/1, 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1300/J398v03n01_03.
Arnett, Jeffrey Jensen (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist 55/5, 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469.
Baldassar, Loretta (2015). Guilty feelings and the guilt trip: Emotions and motivation in migration and transnational caregiving. Emotion, Space and Society 16, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2014.09.003.
Barr, Ashley B., Simons, Ronald L. (2014). A dyadic analysis of relationships and health: Does couple-level context condition partner effects? Journal of Family Psychology 28/4, 448–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037310.
Baumeister, Roy F., Leary, Mark R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117/3, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
Belk, Russel W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research 15/2, 139–168.
Berli, Corina, Schwaninger, Philipp, Scholz, Urte (2021). “We Feel Good”: Daily Support Provision, Health Behavior, and Well-Being in Romantic Couples. Frontiers in Psychology 11, 622492. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.622492.
Bowlby, John (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 52/4, 664–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x.
Cameron, Jessica J., Ross, Michael (2007). In Times of Uncertainty: Predicting the Survival of Long-Distance Relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology 147/6, 581–606. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.6.581-606.
Candlin, Fiona (2010). Art, museums and touch. Manchester: Manchester university press.
Charmaz, Kathy (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (eds. N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 509–535.
Chatterjee, Helen, Noble, Guy (2016). Museums, Health and Well-Being (1st ed.). Milton Park: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315596549.
Clarke-Salt, Yvonne (2017). Loving over Skype: Tactile Viewing, Emotional Atmospheres and Video Calling. Journal of Popular Romance Studies 6, 1–21.
Clarke-Salt, Yvonne (2018). Between the Covers: Couples Making Books Together as a Practice of Love. The Materiality of Love: Essays on Affection and Cultural Practice (1st ed.) (eds. Anna Malinowska, Michael Gratzke). Milton Park: Routledge: 55–67. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315228631.
Collins, Nancy L., Feeney, Brooke C. (2004). An Attachment Theory Perspective on Closeness and Intimacy. Handbook of closeness and intimacy (eds. Debra J. Mashek, Arthur P. Aron). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 163–187.
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, Halton, Eugene (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Derrida, Jacques (1996). Archive fever: A Freudian impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fairbairn, W. Ronald D. (1954). An object-relations theory of the personality. New York: Basic Books.
Fox, Greer Litton (1975). Love Match and Arranged Marriage in a Modernizing Nation: Mate Selection in Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Marriage and the Family 37/1, 180. https://doi.org/10.2307/351042.
Gatzia, Dimitria Electra, Arnaud, Sarah (2022). Loving Objects: Can Autism Explain Objectophilia? Archives of Sexual Behavior 51/4, 2117–2133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02281-5.
Giddens, Anthony (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gostič, Maja (Forthcoming). Konceptualizacija intimnosti v zvezah na daljavo. PhD dissertation. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani.
Hazan, Cindy, Shaver, Phillip (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52/3, 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511.
Hill, Philip (1997). Lacan for beginners. London: Writers and Readers.
Hochschild, Arlie Russell (2012). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Oakland: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520951853.
Horvat, Srećko (2016). The radicality of love. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.
Hoskins, Janet (2013). Biographical Objects. Milton Park: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315022598.
House, James S., Landis, Karl R., Umberson, Debra (1988). Social Relationships and Health. Science 241/4865, 540–545. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3399889.
Illouz, Eva (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.
Illouz, Eva (2012). Why love hurts: A sociological explanation. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.
Jewitt, Carey, Price, Sarah (2019). Family touch practices and learning experiences in the museum. The Senses and Society 14/2, 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2019.1619316.
Kernberg, Otto F. (1976). Object-relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. Lanham: J. Aronson.
King-O’Riain, Rebecca Chiyoko (2015). Emotional streaming and transconnectivity: Skype and emotion practices in transnational families in Ireland. Global Networks 15/2, 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12072.
Klein, Melanie (1932). The psycho-analysis of children. New York: W Norton & Co.
Klein, Melanie (1984). The development of a child (1921). Love, guilt and reparation and other works 1921-1945 (ed. Melanie Klein). New York: Free Press, 1–53
Klein, Melanie (1996). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research 5/2, 160–179.
Klein, Melanie (2017). The collected works of Melanie Klein. London: Karnac Books.
Kolozsvari, Orsolya (2015). “Physically We Are Apart, Mentally We Are Not.” Creating a Shared Space and a Sense of Belonging in Long-Distance Relationships. Qualitative Sociology Review 11/4, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.11.4.05.
Longhurst, Robyn (2013). Using Skype to Mother: Bodies, Emotions, Visuality, and Screens. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31/4, 664–679. https://doi.org/10.1068/d20111.
Lorenz, Konrad (1935). Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels: Der Artgenosse als auslösendes Moment sozialer Verhaltungsweisen. Journal für Ornithologie 83/2, 137–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01905355.
Mahler, Margaret S. (1963). Thoughts about Development and Individuation. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 18/1, 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.1963.11822933.
Malinowska, Anna, Gratzke, Michael, eds. (2018). The materiality of love: Essays on affection and cultural practice. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Marschall, Sabine (2019). ‘Memory objects’: Material objects and memories of home in the context of intra-African mobility. Journal of Material Culture 24/3, 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1359183519832630.
Master, Sarah L., Eisenberger, Naomi I., Taylor, Shelley E., Naliboff, Bruce D., Shirinyan, David, Lieberman, Matthew D. (2009). A Picture’s Worth: Partner Photographs Reduce Experimentally Induced Pain. Psychological Science 20/11, 1316–1318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02444.x.
McGowan, Stephanie (2002). Mental Representations in Stressful Situations: The Calming and Distressing Effects of Significant Others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38/2, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1493.
Miller, Daniel, ed. (2001). Home possessions: Material culture behind closed doors (1. ed.). Oxford: Berg.
Miller, Daniel (2008). The comfort of things. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.
Moran, Anna, O’Brien, Sorcha, eds. (2014). Love Objects: Emotion, Design and Material Culture. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474293891.
Neustaedter, Carman, Greenberg, Saul (2012). Intimacy in long-distance relationships over video chat. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207785.
Parreñas, Rhacel S. (2005). Long distance intimacy: Class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks 5/4, 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00122.x.
Pettigrew, Jonathan (2009). Text Messaging and Connectedness Within Close Interpersonal Relationships. Marriage & Family Review 45/6–8, 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920903224269.
Praper, Peter (1996). Razvojna analitična psihoterapija. Ljubljana: Inštitut za klinično psihologijo.
Purbrick, Louise (2014). “I love giving presents”: The emotion of material culture. Love Objects: Emotion, Design and Material Culture (eds. A. Moran, S. O’Brien). London: Bloomsbury Academic, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474293891.
Rusbult, Caryl E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16/2, 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4.
Sarup, Madan (1994). Home and identity. Travellers’ tales: Narratives of home and displacement (eds. G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam). Milton: Routledge: 93–104.
Sigman, Stuart J. (1991). Handling the Discontinuous Aspects of Continuous Social Relationships: Toward Research on the Persistence of Social Forms. Communication Theory 1/2, 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00008.x.
Smith, Timothy W., Ruiz, John M., Uchino, Bert N. (2004). Mental Activation of Supportive Ties, Hostility, and Cardiovascular Reactivity to Laboratory Stress in Young Men and Women. Health Psychology 23/5, 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.476.
Thien, Deborah (2005). After or beyond feeling? A consideration of affect and emotion in geography. Area 37/4, 450–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00643a.x.
Tseng, Chi-Fang (2016). My Love, How I Wish You Were By My Side: Maintaining Intercontinental Long-Distance Relationships in Taiwan. Contemporary Family Therapy 38/3, 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9384-8.
Vištica, Olinka, Grubišić, Dražen (2017). The Museum of Broken Relationships (1st ed.). New York: Grand Central Publishing.
Winnicott, Donald W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena; a study of the first not-me possession. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 34, 89–97.
Winnicott, Donald W. (1984). Primary Maternal Preoccupation. Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis: Collected papers (1st ed.) (ed. Donald W. Winnicott). Milton: Routledge, 300–305.
Prenosi
Objavljeno
Verzije
- 2023-02-27 (2)
- 2023-02-23 (1)
Kako citirati
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
Avtorji jamčijo, da je delo njihova avtorska stvaritev, da v njem niso kršene avtorske pravice tretjih oseb ali kake druge pravice. V primeru zahtevkov tretjih oseb se avtorji zavezujejo, da bodo varovali interese založnika ter da bodo povrnili morebitno škodo.
Podrobneje v rubriki: Prispevki