Why People Go to Mediums: Motivations and Embodied Experience among Clients of the Three-Legged Stool Practice in Hungary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/SMS20262910Keywords:
mediumship, Hungary, contemporary spirituality, afterlife, embodied experience, commodification of spirituality, object-mediated writingAbstract
This article examines contemporary mediumship in Hungary through ethnographic research among practitioners of a three‑legged stool technique and their clients. Drawing on interviews, participant observation and analysis of séance practices, the study explores why people seek contact with the dead and how these encounters generate experiential certainty, address crises and produce new forms of meaning. By situating the Hungarian material within broader European and global contexts, the article shows how individualised, experience‑centred mediumship operates within today’s spiritual and consumer landscapes.
Downloads
References
Aupers, Stef and Dick Houtman. 2006. Beyond the Spiritual Supermarket: The Social and Public Significance of New Age Spirituality. Journal of Contemporary Religion 21 (2): 201–222. DOI: 10.1080/13537900600655894.
Badone, Ellen. 2018. After-Death Communications: Signs from the Other World in Contemporary North America. In A Companion to the Anthropology of Death, ed. Antonius Robben, 293–305. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781119222422.ch21.
Balla, István. 2009. Bujka Antal: A szellemvilág államcsődöt jósol. 24.hu, 14 March. https://24.hu/belfold/2009/03/14/szellemvilag_allamcsodot_josol/ (accessed 11.3.2026).
Benedek, László. 2024. Az evangéliumi spiritizmus története: Az asztaltáncoltatásból a szellemkinyilatkoztatásig. Budapest: Oo Falu Kiadó.
Bowman, Marion. 1999. Healing in the Spiritual Marketplace: Consumers, Courses and Credentialism. Social Compass 46 (2): 181–189. DOI: 10.1177/003776899046002007.
Bujka, Antal and Piroska Hegedűs. 2000. Ymola: Egy médium igaz történetei. Budapest: Sajó és Társa Könyvkiadói Bt.
Csordas, Thomas J. 2002. Body, Meaning, Healing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Csordas, Thomas J. 2008. Intersubjectivity and Intercorporeality. Subjectivity 22 (1): 110–121. DOI: 10.1057/sub.2008.5.
Darghawth, Rasha. 2013. Contemporary Mediumship: Anthropological Perspectives on the Long Island Medium. The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology 21 (1): 83–90. DOI: 10.5206/uwoja.v21i1.8940.
Grünhut, Adolf. 1921. Tanulmányok a spiritizmus köréből: Magnetizmus, szomnambulizmus, mediumizmus. Budapest: Szellemi Búvárok Pesti Egylete.
Gutierrez, Cathy, ed. 2015. Handbook of Spiritualism and Channeling. Leiden, Boston: Brill.
Heelas, Paul. 2008. Spiritualities of Life: New Age Romanticism and Consumptive Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444301106.
Heelas, Paul and Linda Woodhead. 2005. The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion Is Giving Way to Spirituality. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.
Interlocutor EI034, female, 1976, 17.3.2025.
Interlocutor EI036, female, 1972, 19.3.2025.
Interlocutor EI037, female, 1992, 20.3.2025.
Interlocutor EI041, female, 1982, 28.3.2025.
Interlocutor EI043, female, 1980, 16.6.2025.
Interlocutor EI044, male, 1972, 16.6.2025.
Interlocutor EI045, female, 1991, 17.6.2025.
Interlocutor EI046, female, 1978, 19.6.2025.
Kalvig, Anne. 2016. The Rise of Contemporary Spiritualism: Concepts and Controversies in Talking to the Dead. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315553429.
Kwilecki, Susan. 2009. Twenty-First-Century American Ghosts: The After-Death Communication – Therapy and Revelation from beyond the Grave. Religion and American Culture 19 (1): 101–133. DOI: 10.1525/rac.2009.19.1.101.
Kwilecki, Susan. 2011. Ghosts, Meaning, and Faith: After-Death Communications in Bereavement Narratives. Death Studies 35 (3): 219–243. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2010.511424.
Kwilecki, Susan. 2014. The Soul Contract Theodicy: New Age Understandings of the Death of a Child. Journal of Contemporary Religion 29 (3): 411–424. DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2014.945724.
Oppenheim, Janet. 1985. The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pócs, Éva. 1990. Halottlátó. In Magyar Néprajz VII, ed. Gyula Ortutay, 592–597. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Pócs, Éva. 2002. A magyar halottlátó és a keresztény Európa. In Magyar néphit Közép- és Kelet-Európa határán: Válogatott tanulmányok I, 107–120. Budapest: L’Harmattan.
Redden, Guy. 2016. Revisiting the Spiritual Supermarket: Does the Commodification of Spirituality Necessarily Devalue It? Culture and Religion 17 (2): 231–249. DOI: 10.1080/14755610.2016.1183690.
Renser, Berit and Katrin Tiidenberg. 2024. Commodification of Spirituality and the Spiritual Healers’ Labor on Facebook. International Journal of Communication 18: 1405–1425.
Roof, Wade Clark. 2001. Spiritual Marketplace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rose, Stuart. 2005. Transforming the World: Bringing the New Age into Focus. New York: Peter Lang.
Steffen, Vibeke. 2011. Intrusive Agents and Permeable Selves: Spirit Consultations in Denmark. In Of Bodies and Symptoms: Anthropological Perspectives on Their Social and Medical Treatment, eds. Sylvie Fainzang and Claudie Haxaire, 79–96. Tarragona: URV Publicacions.
Steffen, Vibeke. 2013. Crisis as Deferred Closure – Clairvoyant Counselling in Contemporary Danish Society. Anthropology & Medicine 20 (2): 190–202. DOI: 10.1080/13648470.2013.800806.
Steffen, Vibeke. 2016. Public Anxieties and Projective Identification: Therapeutic Encounters between Danish Clairvoyants and Their Clients. Ethos 44 (4): 485–506. DOI: 10.1111/etho.12142.
Tomlinson, Matt. 2024. Speaking with the Dead: An Ethnography of Extrahuman Experience. Santa Barbara: Punctum Books. DOI: 10.2307/jj.20626770.
White, Cassandra. 2019. Validation, Comfort, and Syncretic Belief in the Afterlife: U.S. Viewers’ Perceptions of Long Island Medium. Anthropology of Consciousness 30 (1): 90–112. DOI: 10.1111/anoc.12108.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
