Who’s Afraid of the Goddess? Leopard’s Tale, Menopausal Syndrome: Terms of Debate within Archaeology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/SMS20222512Keywords:
Neolithic, female figurines, goddesses, Gimbutas, feminist and gender archaeology, archaeological disputesAbstract
This article presents an insight into archaeological disputes around female Neolithic figurines, starting with a historical overview of main academic interpretations of the figurines. Furthermore, it introduces feminist approaches in archaeology related to figurines, showing how androcentric bias has undermined theories and methodologies. Çatalhöyük case-study serves as an example of contrasting narratives. The article argues that academic devaluation of Marija Gimbutas’ work within contemporary archaeology can be considered a litmus test which show the pervasiveness of gender bias in this disciplinary field. Among peculiar arguments against Gimbutas’ theories, there are: menopause syndrome, gynocentric agenda, and reverse sexism, all of which show how the archaeologists have focused on personal attacks rather than on serious academic discussion. In the end, all those rhetoric strategies have shifted scholars’ attention from the main issue which is rarely addressed: why is it that the Neolithic period is dominated by female figurines?
Downloads
References
Alberti, Benjamin, 2012: Queer prehistory: bodies, performativity and matter. In: Bolger, Diane (ed.), A companion to Gender Prehistory. Malden: John Wiley & Sons, 86–107.
Ardener, Edwin, 1975: Belief and the Problem of Women. In: Ardener, Shirley (ed.), Perceiving Women. London: Malaby Press, 1–17.
Arnold, Bettina, 1991: The Deposed Princess of Vix: The Need for an Engendered European prehistory. In: Walde, Dale; Willows, Noreen (eds.), The Archaeology of Gender. Calgary: The University of Calgary, 366–374.
Arnold, Bettina; Wicker, Nancy (eds.), 2001: Gender and the Archaeology of Death. Plymouth: Altamira Press.
Atzeni, Enrico, 1978: La dea madre nelle culture prenuragiche. Sassari: Gallizzi.
Bachofen, Johann Jakob, [1891]1988: Il matriarcato: ricerca sulla ginecocrazia del mondo antico nei suoi aspetti religiosi e giuridici. Torino: Einaudi.
Bailey, Douglass, 2005: Prehistoric Figurines. Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic. London and New York: Routledge.
Balter, Michael, 2016: The Goddess and the Bull: Çatalhöyük: An Archaeological Journey to the Dawn of Civilization. London and New York: Routledge.
Bernabò Brea, Maria; Paola Mazzieri, 2009: Oggetti e contesti rituali nella cultura vbq dell’Emilia occidentale in accademia. PADUSA, Bollettino del Centro Polesano di Studi Storici, Archeologici ed Etnografici. Fabrizio Serra Editore, 7–42.
Bolger, Diane, (ed.) 2012: A companion to gender prehistory. Malden: John Wiley & Sons.
Borić, Dusan; Martini, Fabio; Sarti, Lucia; Starnini, Elisabetta; Visentini, Paola, 2019: Le raffigurazioni femminili neolitiche: riflessioni, problemi e ipotesi. In: Martini, Fabio; Sarti, Lucia; Visentini, Paola (eds.), Le raffigurazioni femminili neolitiche in Italia: iconografia, iconologia, contesti. Udine: Museo friulano di storia naturale, 9–28.
Busoni, Mila, 2000: Genere, sesso, cultura: uno sguardo antropologico. Roma: Carocci.
Butler, Judith, 1996: Corpi che contano. I limiti discorsivi del «Sesso». Milano: Feltrinelli.
Butler, Judith, 2011: Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
Campbell, Joseph, 1989: Foreword. In: Gimbutas, Marija, The Language of the Goddess: Unearthing the Hidden Symbols of Western Civilization. San Francisco: Harper & Row, xiii–xiv.
Campbell, Joseph, 2013: Goddesses: Mysteries of the Feminine Divine. Novato, CA: Joseph Campbell Foundation.
Cauvin, Jacques, 1997: Nascita delle divinità e nascita dell’agricoltura. La rivoluzione dei simboli nel Neolitico. Milano: Jaca Book.
Chapman, John, 1998: The Impact of Modern Invasions and Migrations on Archaeological Explanation. A Biographical Sketch of Marija Gimbutas. In: Díaz-Andreu, Margarita; Stig Sorensen, Marie Louise (eds.), Excavating Women: A History of Women in European Archaeology. London: Routledge, 259–86.
Childe, Gordon, 1951: Social Evolution. London: Watts.
Cohen, Claudine, 2003: La femme des origines. Images de la femme dans la préhistoire occidentale. Parigi: Belin.
Cohen, Claudine, 2018: Femmes de la préhistoire. Parigi: Belin.
Conkey Wright, Margaret; Gero, Joan, 1991: Tensions, pluralities, and engendering archaeology: An introduction to women and prehistory. In: Conkey Wright, Margaret; Gero, Joan (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell, 3–30.
Conkey Wright, Margaret; Tringham, Ruth, 1995: Archaeology and the Goddess: Exploring the Contours of Feminist Archaeology. In: Stanton, Domna; Stewart, Abigail (eds.), Feminisms in the Academy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,199–247.
Connell, Raewyn, 2002: Gender. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Dahlberg, Frances (ed.), 1981: Woman the gatherer. Yale: Yale University Press.
Dashú, Max, 2005: Knocking down straw dolls: A critique of Cynthia Eller’s The myth of matriarchal prehistory. Feminist Theology 13/2, 185–216. DOI: 10.1177/0966735005051947
DeVore, Irven; Lee, Richard, 1968: Man the hunter. Aldine Publishing Company.
Díaz-Andreu, Margarita; Marie Louise, Stig Sorensen (eds.), 2005: Excavating women: a history of women in European archaeology. London: Routledge.
Dobres, Marcia Anne, 1992: Re-considering Venus figurines: A feminist-inspired re-analysis. In: Goldsmith, Sean; Garvie, Sandra; Selin, David; Smith, Jeannette (eds.), Ancient images, ancient thought: The archaeology of ideology. Calgary: University of Calgary, 245–62.
Doni, Martino, 2005: Ta arkaia, tempora ignota. Per un’epistemologia dell’archeologia. In: Gimbutas, Marija, Le dee viventi. Milano: Edizioni Medusa, 1–20.
Douglas, Mary, 2003: Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.
Eller, Cynthia, 2000: The myth of matriarchal prehistory: Why an invented past won’t give women a future. Boston: Beacon Press.
Elster, Ernestine, 2007: Marija Gimbutas: setting the agenda. In: Whitehouse, Ruth; Wright Hamilton, Katherine (eds.), Archaeology and Women: Ancient and Modern Issues. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, 83–120.
Evans, Arthur, 1935: The Palace of Minos. London: Mac-millan.
Fanni, Silvia; Sirigu, Marcella; Soro, Laura (eds.), 2019: Donna o Dea? Le raffigurazioni femminili nella preistoria e protostoria sarda. Cagliari: WRB.
Frazer, James, [1951] 2014: Matriarcato e Dee-madri. Milano: Mimesis.
Foucault, Michael, 2019: The history of sexuality: 1. The will to knowledge. London: Penguin
Gero, Joan; Conkey Wright, Margaret (eds.), 1991: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gero, Joan, 1985: Socio-Politics and the Woman-at-Home Ideology. American Antiquity 50, 342–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/280492
Gilchrist, Roberta, 1991: Women’s archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision. Antiquity, 65 (248), 495–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00080091
Gilchrist, Roberta, 2012: Gender and Archaeology. Contesting the Past. London: Routledge.
Gimbutas, Marija, 1982: The Goddesses and the Gods of Old Europe 6500-3500 BC. Myths and Cult Images. Berckley: University of California Press.
Gimbutas, Marija, 1991: The Civilization of the Goddess. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.
Gimbutas, Marija, 2005: Le dee viventi. Milano: Medusa editore.
Gimbutas, Marija, 2008: Il linguaggio della dea. Roma: Venexia.
Goettner-Abendroth, Heide, 2012: Le società matriarcali. Studi sulle culture indigene del mondo. Roma: Venexia.
Goodison, Lucy; Morris, Christine, 2012: Goddesses in prehistory. In: Bolger, Diane (ed.), A Companion to Gender Prehistory. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 265–287.
Graves, Robert, [1948] 1992: La Dea Bianca. Milano: Adelphi.
Haak, Wolfgang, 2015: Massive Migration from the Steppe Was a Source for Indo-European Languages in Europe. Nature, June 11, 207–211. DOI:10.1038/nature14317
Haraway, Donna, 1988: Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist studies 14.3, 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Hodder, Ian, 2006: The Leopard ́s Tale: Revealing the Mysteries of Çatalhöyük. London: Thames & Hudson.
Hutson, Scott; Hanks, Bryan; Pyburn, Anne, 2012: Gender, Complexity, and Power in Prehistory. In: Bolger, Diane (ed.), A companion to Gender Prehistory. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 45–67.
Insoll, Timothy (ed.), 2017: The Oxford handbook of prehistoric figurines. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199675616.001.0001
James, Edwin Oliver, 1960: Antichi dei mediterranei. Milano: Il Saggiatore.
Knapp, A. Bernard, 2003: Engendering Aphrodite: Women and Society in Ancient Cyprus. American Journal of Archaeology Vol. 107, No. 4, October, 663–665. DOI:10.2307/40024331
Knox, Daisy, 2017: Mediterranean–Cyprus. The Oxford handbook of prehistoric figurines. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 755–776.
Lesure, Richard, 2011. Interpreting Ancient Figurines: Context, comparison, and prehistoric art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lesure, Richard 2017: Comparative perspectives in the interpretation of prehistoric figurines. In: Insoll, Timothy, (ed.), The Oxford handbook of prehistoric figurines. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 37–62.
Lewis-Williams, David; Pearce, David, 2005: Inside the Neolithic mind: Consciousness, cosmos and the realm of the gods. London: Thames & Hudson.
Lilliu, Giovanni, 1999: Arte e religione della Sardegna prenuragica. Sassari: Carlo Delfino Editore.
Lillu, Giovanni, 2017: La civiltà dei sardi dal Paleolitico all’età dei nuraghi. Nuoro: Il Maestrale.
Lugliè, Carlo, 2017: La comparsa dell’economia produttiva e il processo di neolitizzazione in Sardegna. In: Moravetti, Alberto; Melis, Paolo; Foddai, Lavinia; Alba, Elisabetta (eds.), La Sardegna preistorica. Storia, materiali, monumenti. Sassari: Carlo Delfino Editore, 37–64.
Marler, Joan; Haarmann, Harald, 2007: The Goddess and the Bear Hybrid Imagery and Symbolism at Çatalhöyük. The Journal of Archaeomitology, Spring/Summer, 48–79.
Mead, Margaret, 1949: Male and Female: A Study of the Sexes in a Changing World. New York: William Morrow & Co.
Mellaart, James, 1967: Çatal Hüyük: a neolithic town in Anatolia. London: Thames and Hudson.
Meskell, Lynn, 1995: Goddesses, Gimbutas, and ‘New Age’ Archaeology. Antiquity 69, March, no. 262, 74–86. DOI:10.1017/S0003598X00064310
Meskell, Lynn, 2007: Archaeologies of identity. In: Insoll, Timothy (ed.), The Archaeology of Identities: A Reader. New York: Routledge, 23–43.
Morris, Christine, 2017: Minoan and Mycenaean Figurines. In: Insoll, Timothy (ed.), The Oxford handbook of prehistoric figurines. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 659–680.
Nakamura, Carolyn; Meskell, Lynn, 2009: Articulate bodies: forms and figures at Çatalhöyük. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 16/3, 205–230. DOI:10.1007/s10816-009-9070-3
Nanoglou, Stratos, 2006: Regional Perspectives on the Neolithic Anthropomorphic Imagery of Northern Greece. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 19/2, 155-176. DOI:10.1558//jmea.2006.v19i2.155
Naumov, Goce, 2009: Patterns and corporeality: Neolithic visual culture from the Republic of Macedonia. Oxford: Archaeopress. DOI:10.30861/9781407303932
Naumov, Goce, 2014: Figuring out the figurines: Towards the interpretation of Neolithic corporeality in the Republic of Macedonia. DigIt: Journal of the Flinders Archaeological Society 2/1, 49–60.
Nelson, Sarah Milledge; Rosen-Ayalon, Myriam, (eds.), 2001: In Pursuit of Gender: Worldwide Archaeological Approaches. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
Navickaitė, Rasa, 2019: The Prehistoric Goddess of the Late Twentieth Century: Transnational Feminist Reception, Construction and Appropriation of Marija Gimbutas. PhD thesis, Budapest: Central European University.
Neumann, Erich, [1955] 1981: La grande madre: fenomenologia delle configurazioni femminili dell’inconscio. Roma: Astrolabio.
Nilsson, Martin, Persson, 1971: The Minoan-Mycenaean religion and its survival in Greek religion. Vol. 9. Biblo & Tannen Publishers.
Patou-Mathis, Marylène, 2020: L’homme préhistorique est aussi une femme: Une histoire de l’invisiblité des femmes. Parigi: Allary Editions.
Renaud, Etienne, 1929: Prehistoric female figurines from America and the Old World. The Scientific Monthly 28/6, 507–512.
Renfrew, Colin; Bahn, Paul (eds.), 2013: Archaeology: the key concepts. London: Routledge.
Renfrew, Colin, 2017a: Marija Rediviva: DNA and Indo-European Origins. The First Marija Gimbutas Memorial Lecture. Chicago: The Oriental Institute.
Renfrew, Colin, 2017b: Cycladic Figurines. In: Insoll, Timothy (ed.), The Oxford handbook of prehistoric figurines. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 637-658.
Rigoglioso, Marguerite, 2007: The Disappearing of the Goddess and Gimbutas. A Critical Review of The Goddess and the Bull. Journal of Archaeomythology 3/1, 95–105.
Robb, John, 2015: Burial and Human Body Representations in the Mediterranean Neolithic. In: Fowler, Chris; Harding, Jan; Hofmann, Daniela (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe. Oxford: OUP Oxford. Ebook.
Robb, John; Harris, Oliver, 2017: Becoming gendered in European prehistory: was Neolithic gender fundamentally different? American Antiquity 83/1, 1–20. DOI:10.1017/aaq.2017.54
Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist; Lamphere, Louise; Bamberger, Joan, 1974: Woman, culture, and society. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Russel, Bertrand, 1991: Storia della filosofia occidentale. Milano: Tea.
Sørensen, Marie, Louise Stig, 2013: Gender archaeology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Soffer, Olga, 1987: Upper Paleolithic connubia, refugia, and the archaeological record from eastern Europe. In: Soffer, Olga (ed.), The Pleistocene Old World: Regional perspectives. New York: Plenum Publishing, 333–348.
Soffer, Olga; Adovasio, Hyland, 2000: The “Venus” figurines: textiles, basketry, gender, and status in the Upper Paleolithic. Current Anthropology 41/4, 511–537. DOI:10.1086/317381
Soffer, Olga; Conkey Wright, Margaret, 1997: Studying ancient visual cultures. In: Soffer, Olga; Conkey Wright, Margaret; Stratmaan, Deborah (eds.), Beyond art: Pleistocene image and symbol. San Francisco: University of California Press, 1–16.
Spretnak, Charlene, 2011: Anatomy of a backlash: Concerning the work of Marija Gimbutas. The Journal of Archaeomythology 7, 25–51.
Talalay, Lauren, 1993: Deities, Dolls & Devices. Neolitic figurines from Franchti Chave, Greece. Bloominton & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Ucko, Peter, 1962: The interpretation of prehistoric anthropomorphic figurines. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 92/1, 38–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2844320
Ucko, Peter, 1968: Anthropomorphic figurines of predynastic Egypt and Neolithic Crete with comparative material from the prehistoric Near East and mainland Greece. London: Royal Anthropological Institute. Occasional papers.
Vella Gregory, Isabelle, 2007: Embodied materiality: The human form in pre-Nuragic Sardinia. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 2/21, 9–31.
Vella Gregory, Isabelle, 2017: Mediterranean Sardinia. In: Insoll, Timothy, (ed.), The Oxford handbook of prehistoric figurines. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 779–822.
Weiner, Annette, 1979: Trobriand kinship from another view: The reproductive power of women and men. Man 14/2, 328–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2801571
Whitehouse, Ruth, 2002: Gender in the South Italian Neolithic: A Combinatory Approach. In: Milledge Nelson, Sarah; Rosen-Ayalon, Myriam (eds.), In Pursuit of Gender: Worldwide Archaeological Approaches. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press, 54–118.
Whitehouse, Ruth, 2013: Gender in Central Mediterranean Prehistory. In: Bolger, Diane (ed.), A Companion to Gender Prehistory. Malden-Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 480–501.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-10-28 (3)
- 2022-10-21 (2)
- 2022-10-12 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
