Subjekt, za katerega se predpostavlja, da voli

teflonski totemizem in nepravi čas demokracije

Avtorji

  • J. Asher Godley

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.46.2.06

Ključne besede:

psihoanaliza, meje demokracije, suverenost, bližnjik, volitve, Trump

Povzetek

V šestem poglavju knjige Read My Desire Joan Copjec trdi, da se konstitutivne omejitve ameriške demokracije simptomatsko kažejo v volilni izbiri očitno nekompetentne suverene figure. Pri voditelju, za katerega se vladanje izkaže za »nemogoč poklic« (Freud), se kastracija Drugega kaže kot univerzalni znak, ki sproži histerično obliko ljubezni celo med potencialnimi kritiki. Prispevek preučuje ključno dopolnitev te dinamike med voditeljem in skupino v »bližnjikovski« strukturi glasovanja. Ko subjekt voli, zapiše označevalec svoje drugačnosti z oznako, ki ga odtuji od drugih volivcev (s tem ko njeno drugačnost spremeni v podatkovno točko) in ga hkrati postavi v revitalizirajoč imaginarni konflikt z njimi. V tej neinterakciji pride do posebnega izračuna glede t. i. »neodločenih volivcev«, tj. demografsko konstruirane skupine posameznikov, katerih domnevno delovanje naj bi odločalo o usodi naroda. Tako volivec kot kandidat tega hipotetičnega »subjekta, za katerega se predpostavlja, da voli«, nato obravnavata tako, da volivec svoje ravnanje prilagaja vnaprejšnji gotovosti o usodnem znaku. V volilnih ciklih, kiso obvladovali praktično vse vidike državljanskega življenja, tovrstno preračunavanje tega malega podobnika (materializiranega v neskončnih javnomnenjskih raziskavah infantaziranega v rasističnih karikaturah) izvaja časovni pritisk na demokratične subjekte, ki jih pogosto prisili k prenaglim odločitvam. S primerjalnim branjem Copjecinega poglavja in Lacanovega eseja »Logični čas« ta esej zaključi z interpretacijo intersubjektivne logike, ki stoji za to časovno prisilo.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995.

Barthes, Roland. “The Reality Effect.” In The Rustle of Language, translated by Richard Howard, 141–48. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.

Buck-Morss, Susan. “Hegel and Haiti.” Critical Inquiry 26 (Summer 2000): 821–65.

Copjec, Joan. Read My Desire: Lacan Against the Historicists. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.

Copjec, Joan. “The Subject Defined by Suffrage.” Lacanian Ink 7 (Spring/Summer 1993). [https://www.lacan.com/frameVII4.htm](https://www.lacan.com/frameVII4.htm).

Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents. In The Future of an Illusion, Civilization and Its Discontents and Other Works, 1927–1931, edited by James Strachey, 57–146. Vol. 21 of The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press, 1961.

Freud, Sigmund. “Fragments of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria (1905 [1901]).” In A Case of Hysteria, Three Essays on Sexuality, and Other Works, 1901–1905, edited by James Strachey, 1–122. Vol. 7 of The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press, 1953.

Freud, Sigmund. “Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (1921).” In Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Group Psychology, and Other Works, 1920–1922, edited by James Strachey, 67–144. Vol. 18 of The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press, 1955.

George, Sheldon. “Lacan’s Theory of Race: From Logical Time and the Raced Body to Foreclosure and the Deracinated Psyche.” Keynote lecture at Lack IV: Psychoanalytic Theory in 2023, University of Vermont, Burlington, April 2023.

Godley, J. Asher. “The Con and the Primal Horde.” Cultural Critique 122 (Winter 2024): 1–31.

Hegel, Georg W. F. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.

Lacan, Jacques. Desire and Its Interpretation. Translated by Bruce Fink. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, edited by Jacques-Alain Miller, book 6. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2019.

Lacan, Jacques. Encore: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge. Translated by Bruce Fink. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, edited by Jacques-Alain Miller, book 20. New York: W. W. Norton, 1998.

Lacan, Jacques. “Logical Time and the Assertion of Anticipated Certainty.” In Écrits, translated by Bruce Fink, 161–75. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.

Lacan, Jacques. “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience.” In Écrits, translated by Bruce Fink, 75–81. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.

Lacan, Jacques. …or Worse. Translated by A. R. Price. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, edited by Jacques-Alain Miller, book 19. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2018.

Lacan, Jacques. The Other Side of Psychoanalysis. Translated by Russell Grigg. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, edited by Jacques-Alain Miller, book 17. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.

Lacan, Jacques. “Presentation on Psychical Causality.” In Écrits, translated by Bruce Fink, 123–58. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.

Lacan, Jacques. “Television.” Translated by Denis Hollier, Rosalind Krauss, and Annette Michelson. October 40 (1987): 6–50.

Lefort, Claude. Democracy and Political Theory. Translated by David Macey. London: Polity, 1991.

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Translated by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Žižek, Slavoj. “Slavoj Žižek: What Lies Ahead?” Jacobin, January 17, 2023. https://jacobin.com/2023/01/slavoj-Žižek-time-future-history-catastrophe-emancipation.

Objavljeno

2026-01-08

Kako citirati

Godley, J. A. (2026). Subjekt, za katerega se predpostavlja, da voli: teflonski totemizem in nepravi čas demokracije. Filozofski Vestnik, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.46.2.06

Številka

Rubrike

Joan Copjec in Read My Desire: Lacan Against the Historicists, trideset let pozneje