The Nature of Ideas in Descartes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.43.1.02Keywords:
Idea, mode, objective reality, representation, perception, consciousness, ArnauldAbstract
The article defines the problem of the nature of ideas in Descartes’s philosophy according to the ontology of substances. First, it illuminates Descartes’s relation to antecedent theories of ideas (as platonic forms or as corporal images) and demonstrates that, in opposition to them, Descartes conceives ideas as modes of thinking substance. Then, it develops two possible explanations of his theory. The first one understands an idea as a complex consisting of perception and its necessary internal object, which enables the representation of external objects. The second one understands it as an act with intrinsic representative structure. By using Arnauld’s analysis of Descartes’s texts, it demonstrates that in accordance with the second model, an idea is a singular mode of thinking substance, which should at the same time be understood as an act of mind and as a representation of objects.
Downloads
References
Arnauld, Antoine, Des vraies et des fausses idées, Pariz, J. Vrin, 2011.
Ayers, Michael, »Ideas and Objective Being«, v: Daniel Garber in Michael Ayers (ur.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, 2 zv., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, str. 1062–1107.
Avguštin, O svobodni izbiri, prev. N. Homar, J. Kavčič, Ljubljana, Založba Krtina, 2003.
Chappell, Vere, »The Theory of Ideas«, v: Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (ur.), Essays on Descartes’ Meditations, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1986, str. 177–188.
Chappell, Vere, »Descartes’s Ontology«, Topoi, 16 (2/1997), str. 111–127. DOI/10.1023/ A:1005847612397.
Cook, Monte, »Arnauld’s Alleged Representationalism«, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 12 (1/1974), str. 53–62. DOI/10.1353/hph.2008.0620.
Cook, Monte, »The Alleged Ambiguity of ʻIdea’ in Descartes’ Philosophy«, The Soutwestern Journal of Philosophy 6 (1/1975), str. 87–103. www.jstor.org/stable/43155019.
Cook, Monte, »Descartes’s Alleged Representationalism«, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 4 (1987), str. 179–195. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27743807.
Costa, Michael, »What Cartesian Ideas are not«, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 21 (4/1983), str. 537–549. DOI/10.1353/hph.1983.0095.
Danto, Arthur, »The Representational Character of Ideas and the Problem of the External World«, v: M. Hooker (ur.), Descartes: Critical and Interpretive Essays, Baltimore, MD, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978, str. 287–98.
Descartes, René, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes zv. II., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Descartes, René, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes zv. III., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Descartes, René, OEuvres de Descartes, Pariz, J. Vrin, 1996.
Descartes, René, Razprava o metodi, Ljubljana, Založba ZRC, 2006.
Hobbes, Thomas, Človekova narava, Elementi naravnega in političnega prava, 1. del, prev. I. Pribac, Ljubljana, Krtina, 2006.
Hoffman, Paul, »Direct Realism, Intentionality, and the Objective Being of Ideas«, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 83 (2002), str. 163–179.
Jolley, Nicholas, The Light of the Soul: Theories of Ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1990.
Kenny, Anthony, Descartes: A Study of his Philosophy, New York, Random house, 1968.
Lennon, Thomas, »The Inherence Pattern and Descartes’ Ideas«, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 12 (1/1974), str. 43–52. DOI/10.1353/hph.2008.0146.
Lovejoy, A. O, »ʻRepresentative Ideas’ in Malebranche and Arnauld«, Mind, 32 (128/1923), str. 449–461. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2249606.
Malebranche, Nicolas, OEuvres Complètes de Malebranche, Pariz, Vrin, 1958–84.
McRae, Robert, »ʻIdea’ as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century«, Journal of the History of Ideas, 26 (2/1965), str. 175–190. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2708226.
McRae, Robert, »Descartes’ Definition of Thought«, v R. J. Butler (ur.), Cartesian Studies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1972, str. 32–54.
Mori, Gianluca, »Hobbes, Descartes, and Ideas: A Secret Debate«, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 50 (2/2012), str. 197–212. DOI/ 10.1353/hph.2012.0021.
Michael, Emily, in Michael, Fred, »Corporeal Ideas in Seventeenth-Century Psychology«, Journal of the History of Ideas, 50 (1989), str. 31–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2709785.
Moreau, Denis »Introduction«, v Antoine Arnauld, Des vraies et des fausses idées , Pariz, J. Vrin, 2011, str. 30–36.
Nadler, Steven, Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy of Ideas, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1989.
Nadler, Steven, Malebranche and Ideas, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992.
Smith, Kurt, »Rationalism and Representation«, v Alan Nelson (ur.), A Companion to Rationalism, Oxford, Blackwell, 2005, str. 206–223.
Yolton, John, »Ideas and Knowledge in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy«, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 13 (2/1975), str. 145–165. DOI/ 10.1353/hph.2008.0068.
Yolton, John, »On Being Present to the Mind: A Sketch for the History of an Idea«, Dialogue, 14 (1975), str. 373–388.
Yolton, John, Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
Wagner, Stephen, »Descartes on the Power of ʻIdeas’«, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 13 (3/1996), str. 287–297. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27744708.
Wolfson, A. Harry, »Extradeical and Intradeical Interpretation of Platonic Ideas«, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1 (jan.-mar./1961), str. 3–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2707871.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
