To je stara verzija objvaljena 2021-12-31. Preberite najnovejšo verzijo.

Arendt, Koselleck in Begreifen: ponovni premislek politike in pojmov v času krize

Avtorji

  • Vlasta Jalušič Peace Institute & Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.42.1.05

Ključne besede:

Arendt, Koselleck, Begreifen, politika, politični pojmi, prelom s tradicijo, kriza

Povzetek

Reinharda Kosellecka so imeli dolgo časa za posebej eminentnega teoretika političnih pojmov, medtem ko so se na Hannah Arendt kot konceptualnega avtorja osredotočili šele nedavno. Članek raziskuje skupni prostor razmišljanja med Arendtovo in Koselleckom skozi njuno tezo o vrzeli, rezom, krizo ali prelomom v tradiciji političnega mišljenja in zgodovinskih obdobij ter to, kako je vse to povezano z njunim pojmom pojmovnosti, tj. Begreifen (razumevanja). Navkljub vtisu, da se je vsak od njiju osredotočil na glavni prelom med preteklostjo in prihodnostjo, sta tako Arendt kot Koselleck preučevala različne prelome v zahodni politični tradiciji. Članek skuša pokazati, kako sta njuno različno mišljenje in premislek političnih pojmov (Begreifen) povezana s temi prelomi s številnimi direktnimi in posrednimi srečanji, ter kako sta si oba avtorja istočasno blizu in narazen. Medtem ko oba različno pojmujeta politiko in politično, lahko njuno razumevanje prelomov v času in kriz beremo kot komplementarno, zlasti glede na njuno prizadevanje, da bi odgovornost za delovanje in za pojme vrnila nazaj v človeško sfero.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Arendt, Hannah, “The Great Tradition and the Nature of Totalitarianism”, 1st lecture, New York, New School for Social Research 1953 (Series: Speeches and Writings File, 1923-1975), Hannah Arendt Papers at the Library of Congress, https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=mharendt&fileName=05/05145a/05145apage.db&recNum=0.

Arendt, Hannah, Fragwürdige Traditionsbestände in politischen Denken der Gegenwart: vier Essays, Frankfurt, Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1957. Arendt, Hannah, On Violence, London, Harvest, 1970.

Arendt, Hannah. The Life of the Mind. Vols. I & II, New York, Brace & Jovanovich, 1978. Arendt, Hannah, “On Hannah Arendt”, in M. Hill (ed.), Hannah Arendt and the Recovery of the Public World, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1979, pp. 333–334.

Arendt, Hannah, Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, Middle- sex, Penguin Books, 1985.

Arendt, Hannah, Origins of Totalitarianism, London, André Deutsch, 1986.

Arendt, Hannah, On Revolution, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, Penguin Books, 1990. Arendt, Hannah,

Essays in Understanding, New York, San Diego, London, Harcourt Brace & Company, 1994.

Arendt, Hannah, “Karl Marx and the Tradition of Western Political Thought”, Social Re- search, 69 (2/2002), pp. 273–319.

Arendt, Hannah, The Promise of Politics, New York, Schocken Books 2005.

Barros, José D’Assunção, “Perspectiva sobe o tempo em Hannah Arendt e Koselleck: duas leituras sobre a quebra entre o Presente e o Passado”, Argumentos, 6 (12/2014), pp. 169–189.

Beradt, Charlotte, Das Dritte Reich des Traums; mit einem Nachwort von Reinhart Kosel- leck, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 1981.

Buckler, Steve, Hannah Arendt and Political Theory: Challenging the Tradition, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2011.

Brunner, Otto, W. Conze, R. Koselleck (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Vols. 1-9, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1972–1997.

Coleman, Janet, “The Practical Use of Begriffsgeschichte”, Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, 3 (1/1999), pp. 28–40.

Funken, Peter, “Hannah Arendt’s Denkraum: The Experience of an Experimental Exhibi- tion”, 2006, http://www.wolfgang-heuer.com/denkraum/eng/space.htm.

Geulen, Christian, “Reply”, Contributions to the History of Concepts, 7 (1/2012), pp. 118–128.

Gilbert, Andrew Simon, The Crisis Paradigm. Description and Prescription in Social and Political Theory, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.

Grunenberg, Antonia, “Arendt, Heidegger, Jaspers: Thinking through the Breach in Tra- dition”, Social Research, 74 (4/2007), Hannah Arendt’s Centenary: Political and Philosophical Perspectives, Part II, pp. 1003–1028.

Heuer, Wolfgang, “Verstehen als sichtbarmachen von Erfahrungen”, in W. Heuer and I. von der Lühe (eds.), Dichterisch denken: Hannah Arendt und die Künste, Göttingen, Wallstein, 2007, pp. 243–257.

Hoffman, Stefan-Ludvig. “Koselleck, Arendt, and the Anthropology of Historical Experience”, History and Theory, 49 (2/2010), pp. 212–236.

Holst, Jonas, “Retrieving Experience: On the Phenomenology of Experience in Hegel and Kierkegaard, Arendt and Gadamer”, Open Philosophy (2/2019), pp. 480–490.

Huhnholz, Sebastian, Von Carl Schmitt zu Hannah Arendt? Heidelberger Entstehungsspuren und bundesrepublikanische Liberalisierungsschichten von Reinhart Kosellecks “Kritik und Krise”, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 2019.

Hyvönen, Ari-Elmeri, “The Janus face of political experience”, Arendt Studies (2/2018), pp. 125–147.

Imbriano, Gennaro, Der Begriff der Politik: Die Moderne als Krisenzeit im Werk von Reihart Koselleck, Frankfurt and New York, Campus Verlag, 2018.

Jalušič, Vlasta, “Les éléments de la tradition en question: Hannah Arendt en ex-Yugoslavie et dans les États successeurs”, Tumultes, 30 (8/2008), pp. 81–106.

Jalušič Vlasta, “G.W.F. Hegel”, in W. Heuer et al. (eds.), Arendt-Handbuch. Leben – Werk – Wirkung, Stuttgart, Weimar, Metzler, 2011, pp. 216–221.

Koselleck, Reinhart, “Einleitung”, in O. Brunner, W. Conze, R. Koselleck (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Vol. 1, Stuttgart, Ernst Klett Verlag, 1972, pp. XIII–XXVII.

Koselleck, Reinhart, Kritik und Krise. Ein Beitrag zur Pathogenese der Bürgerlichen Welt, Munich, Pieper, 1973/1959.

Koselleck, Reinhart, Sozialgeschichte und Begriffsgeschichte, in W. Schieder & Sellin V. (eds.), Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland. Vol. 1, Göttingen, Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 1986, pp. 89–109.

Koselleck, Reinhart, “Erfahrungswandel und Methodenwechsel. Eine historisch-anthropologische Skizze”, in C. Meier, J. Rüsen J. (eds.), Historische Methode, Munich, Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1988, pp. 13–61.

Koselleck, Reinhart, “Remarks on the History of the Concept of Crisis”, in R. Lilly, J. Sallis (eds.) The Ancients and the Moderns, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1996, pp. 148–158.

Koselleck, Reinhart, “Laudatio auf François Furet”, in Festschrift zur Vergabe des Hannah-Arendt-Preises für politisches Denken an François Furet, Bremen, Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 1996, pp. 9–12.

Koselleck, Reinhart, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, New York, Columbia University Press, 2004.

Koselleck, Reinhart, Sediments of Time: On Possible Histories (translation of Zeitschichten), Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2019.

Koselleck, Reinhart, “Begriffliche Innovationen der Aufklärungssprache”, in R. Koselleck, U. Spree, and W. Steinmetz (eds.), Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der historischen und sozialen Sprache, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp, 2006, pp. 309–339.

Lara, Maria Pia, The Disclosure of Politics: Struggles Over the Semantics of Secularization, New York, Columbia University Press, 2013.

Mehring, Reinhardt, “R. Koselleck: Begriffsgeschichten”, H-Soz-Kult, 29 November 2006, https://www.hsozkult.de/publicationreview/id/reb-9137.

Norberg, Jakob, “Arendt in Crisis: Political Thought Between Past and Future”, College Literature, 38 (1/2011), pp. 131–149.

Olsen, Nicolas, Beyond utopianism and relativism: History in the plural in the work of Reinhart Koselleck, Florence, European University Institute, 2009.

Palonen, Kari, Die Entzauberung der Begriffe. Das Umschreiben der politischen Begriffe bei Quentin Skinner und Reinhart Koselleck, Münster, LIT Verlag, 2004.

Palonen, Kari, The Struggle with Time: A Conceptual History of ‘Politics’ as an Activity, Münster, LIT Verlag, 2014.

Palonen, Kari, “The Life and Work of Reinhart Koselleck”, Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory 16 (1/2013), pp. 215–221.

Palti, Elías José, “Reinhart Koselleck: His Concept of the Concept and Neo-Kantianism”, Contributions to the History of Concepts, 6 (2/2011), pp. 1–20.

Palti, Elías José, An Archaeology of the Political: Regimes of Power from the Seventeenth Century to the Present, New York, Columbia University Press, 2017.

Pankakoski, Timo. “Conflict, Context, Concreteness: Koselleck and Schmitt on Concepts”, Political Theory, 38 (6/2010), pp. 749–779.

Richter, Melvin, “Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”, History and Theory, 29 (1/1990), pp 38–70.

Sigwart, Hans Jörg, The Wandering Thought of Hannah Arendt, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.

Steinmetz, Willibald, “Some Thoughts on a History of Twentieth-Century German Basic Concepts”, Contributions to the History of Concepts, 7 (1/2012), pp. 78–100.

Steinmetz, Willibald, M. Freeden, and J. Fernández-Sebastián (eds.), Conceptual History in the European Space, New York and Oxford, Berghahn Books, 2017.

Vollrath, Ernst, “Hannah Arendt and the Method of Political Thinking”, Social Research (Summer 1977), pp. 160–182.

Objavljeno

2021-12-31

Verzije

Kako citirati

Jalušič, V. (2021). Arendt, Koselleck in Begreifen: ponovni premislek politike in pojmov v času krize. Filozofski Vestnik, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.42.1.05