Queer Phantom Critters
Varieties of Causality in Agential Realism and Psychoanalysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/46.2.02Keywords:
Joan Copjec, Jacques Lacan, Karen Barad, agential realism, causality, microbiology, science, queer theoryAbstract
What are the contemporary forms of the Foucauldian historicism that Read My Desire sought to correct? In the theoretical humanities, the most insurgent variant is surely the revival of the turn not to the real, but to reality; to the material or phenomenal and, ultimately, to being as such. Generally speaking, this contemporary orientation of thought aims either to emancipate humanity from the determinative distortions of subjectivity, of the transcendental constitution of apperception, or else to dislodge this human function from the privilege of its presumed centrality, thereby relegating it to the same plane occupied by every other animate and inanimate being. As this paper argues, the agential realist’s definition of causality, despite its claims to complexity and indeterminacy (not to mention a lineage that connects back to the same structuralist linguistics that shaped Lacan’s thought), is ultimately guilty on the charge of historicism. Precisely in their allergy to the strange causal faculty of negativity, the argument’s conceptions of “material-discursive interactions” and “intra-agential spactimematterings” are the crime’s telltale clues. In short, the ambiguously defined relation of discourse to a consistently indeterminate idea of matter, and the subsequent disappearance of discourse’s non-closure or incompletion from the causal field, not only obfuscates the signifier’s retroactive creationist powers, but also renders illegible what we might call the desire of the empirical natural sciences in both their humanist-progressivist and properly unconscious forms.
Downloads
References
Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007.
Barad, Karen. “Nature’s Queer Performativity.” Qui Parle 19, no. 2 (January 2011): 121–58.
Copjec, Joan. Read My Desire: Lacan Against the Historicists. London: Verso, 2015.
Dean, Tim. “No Sex Please, We’re American.” American Literary History 27, no. 3 (Fall 2015): 614–24.
Dove, Rick. Riverlaw. [https://www.riverlaw.us](https://www.riverlaw.us).
Horkheimer, Max. Critical Theory: Selected Essays by Max Horkheimer. Translated by Mathew J. O'Connell et al. New York: Continuum, 2002.
Lacan, Jacques. Je parle aux murs. Paris: Seuil, 2012.
Lacan, Jacques. Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse. Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan, edited by Jacques-Alain Miller, book 11. Paris: Seuil, 1973.
Miller, Jacques-Alain. “Docile to Trans.” Translated by Philip Dravers, Pamela King and Peggy Papada. The Symptom 18. [https://www.lacan.com/symptom/docile-to-trans-by-jacques-alain-miller](https://www.lacan.com/symptom/docile-to-trans-by-jacques-alain-miller).
Schrader, Astrid. “Responding to Pfiesteria piscicida (the Fish Killer): Phantomatic Ontologies, Indeterminacy, and Responsibility in Toxic Microbiology.” Social Studies of Science 40, no. 2 (April 2010): 275–306.
Varoufakis, Yanis. Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism. Brooklyn: Melville House, 2023.
Zupančič, Alenka. What Is Sex? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
