Sets, Set Sizes, and Infinity in Badiou's Being and Event
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.41.2.07Keywords:
mathematical ontology, ordinality, cardinality, transfinite sum, limit ordinal, subtractive ontology, numerosityAbstract
This paper argues that Cantorian transfinite cardinality is not a necessary assumption for the ontological claims in Badiou’s L’Être et l’Événement (Vol. 1). The necessary structure for Badiou’s mathematical ontology in this work was only the ordinality of sets. The method for reckoning the sizes of sets was only assumed to follow the standard Cantorian measure. In the face of different and compelling forms of measuring non-finite sets (following Benci and Di Nasso, and Mancosu), it is argued that Badiou’s project can indeed accommodate this pluralism of measurement. In turn, this plurality of measurement implies that Badiou’s insistence on the “subtraction of the one”, the move to affirm the unconditioned being of the “inconsistent multiple”, results in the virtuality of the one, a pluralism of counting that further complicates the relationship between the one and the multiple in the post-Cantorian era.
Downloads
References
Arthur, Richard T.W., “Leibniz’s Syncategorematic Actual Infinite”, in O. Nachtomy, R.
Winegar (eds.), Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy, Springer, Cham 2018, pp. 155–179.
— “Leibniz’s syncategorematic infinitesimals”, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 67
(5/2013), pp. 553–593
Badiou, Alain, L’Être et l’Événement, Seuil, Paris 1988
— Being and Event, trans. O. Feltham, Continuum, London 2005
— “New Horizons in Mathematics as a Philosophical Condition: An Interview with Alain
Badiou [with Tzuchien Tho]”, Parrhesia 3 (2007), pp. 1–11
— Number and Numbers, trans. R. Mackay, Polity Press, Boston 2008
— “Destruction, Negation, Subtraction – On Pier Paolo Pasolini”, Art Center College of
Design in Pasadena, 2007, available at: https://www.lacan.com/badpas.htm
Barwise, Jon, “Situations, Sets and the Axiom of Foundation”, Logic Colloquium 1984,
J.B. Paris, A.J. Wilkie, G.M. Wilmers (eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam
, pp. 21–36
Benci, Vieri, and Di Nasso, Mauro, “Numerosities of labeled sets: A new way of counting”,
Advances in Mathematics, 173(2003), pp. 50–67
— Benci, Vieri, Di Nasso, Mauro and Forti, Marco, “An Aristotelian notion of size”, Annals
of Pure and Applied Logic, 143 (1-3/2006), pp. 43–53
Bolzano, Bernard, Paradoxien des Unendlichen, C. H. Reclam, Leipzig 1851
— The Paradoxes of the Infinite, trans. D. A.Steele, Routledge, London 1950
Cantor, Georg, “Mitteilungen zur Lehre vom Transfiniten”, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und
philosophische Kritik 91 (1887-1888), pp. 81–125, 240–265
— “Über unendliche, lineare Punktmannichfaltigkeiten”, in E. Zermelo (ed.), Gesammelte
Abhandlungen mathematischen und philosophischen Inhalts. Mit erläuternden
Anmerkungen sowie mit Ergänzungen aus dem Briefwechsel, J. Springer, Berlin 1936;
reprinted Olms, Hildesheim 1966, pp. 165–209
Dedekind, Richard, Essays on the Theory of Numbers, Dover Publications, Mineola 1963
Fraser, Zachary Luke (Lucca Fraser), “The Law of the Subject: Alain Badiou, Luitzen
Brouwer and the Kripkean Analyses of Forcing and the Heyting Calculus”, Cosmos
and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 2 (1–2/2006), pp. 94–133
Galileo, Galilei, Discourses and Mathematical Demonstrations Relating to Two New
Sciences, trans. Crew and de Salvio, Dover, New York, pp. 31–37
Jahnke, Hans Niels, “Cantor’s cardinal and ordinal infinities: An epistemological and
didactic view”, Educational Studies in Mathematics (48/2001), pp. 175–197
Kunen, Kenneth, “Ultrafilters and Independent Sets”, Transactions of the American
Mathematical Societies, 172 (1972), pp. 229–306
— Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs, Elsevier, Amsterdam 1983
Kenneth Kunen, Set Theory, revised edition, College Publications, London 2011
Mancosu, Paolo, “Measuring the size of infinite collections of natural numbers: Was Cantor’s
theory of infinite number inevitable?”, Abstraction and Infinity, Oxford University
Press, Oxford 2015, pp. 116–153
Parker, Matthew, “Set size and part-whole principle”, The Review of Symbolic Logic, 6
(2013), pp. 589–612
Rabouin, David, and Arthur, Richard T. W., “Leibniz’s syncategorematic infinitesimals
II: their existence, their use and their role in the justification of the differential calculus”,
Archive for History of Exact Sciences 74 (5/2020), pp. 401–443
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
