Copernicus’ Rhetorics: Observational Tests Against the Movement of the Earth and the Theory of Impetus
Keywords:
Copernicus, rhetorics, Buridan, the theory of impetus, movement of the EarthAbstract
Copernicus’ arguments in favour of the movement of the Earth were often said to be rhetorical. The fact that the nature of this argumentation is more rhetorical than demonstrative is supported by Copernicus’ formulation of one of the observational tests against the movement of the Earth. The argument, according to which projectiles ejected straight up into the air should – in view of the hypothesis of the rotation of the Earth – fall behind the place from which they were ejected, is for Buridan magis demonstrativa apparentia against the movement of the Earth. And it is exactly this argument that Copernicus presented in a very weak form. According to the author of the article, this weak formulation of the argument against the movement of the Earth is a result of Copernicus’ acceptance of certain basic postulates of the theory of impetus, which was the key factor why Buridan in the above mentioned case concluded that the Earth is at rest. Since Copernicus wanted to avoid this conclusion, he had to formulate the argument in a weak form.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-03-04
How to Cite
Vesel, M. (2016). Copernicus’ Rhetorics: Observational Tests Against the Movement of the Earth and the Theory of Impetus. Filozofski Vestnik, 25(3). Retrieved from https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/4325
Issue
Section
Movement of the Earth
License
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter