Artistic Autonomy and Heteronomy
Keywords:
avant-garde art, autonomy, heteronomy, political art, instrumentalityAbstract
In the article, the author discusses the so-called aesthetic (or heteronomous artistic) avant-gardes, i.e. those that in the previous century insisted on the fusion of art and “life”. The author discusses one of the first such outstanding examples, namely Russian constructivism, which was often (Benjamin H.D. Buchloh, Boris Groys, Jacques Rancière, etc.) the subject of such discussion. The author shares with the mentioned writers the opinion that in the cases noted the established “formation paradigm” is insufficient for it limits the designation of modernism to its “Western” (autonomous) part. The author mostly confirms Rancière’s views on this topic and draws attention to the third variant of heteronomy, namely that which was developed by the Situationist movement.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-02-07
How to Cite
Erjavec, A. (2016). Artistic Autonomy and Heteronomy. Filozofski Vestnik, 33(3). Retrieved from https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/4190
Issue
Section
Autonomy and Heteronomy of Art
License
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter