Less then Something, but More then Nothing - Zeno, Infinitesimals and the Continuum Paradox
Keywords:
philosophy of science, philosophy of nature, continuum, infinitesimals, history of mathematics, infinity, Zeno’s aporiasAbstract
The hypothesis is that a line can be divided into an infinite number of parts. The question is whether extension is a property of these infinitely small parts of the line. If the infinitely small parts are extensional then they can be further divided. On the other hand, if they have no extension how can they compose the line? The sum of non-extensional units can not be extensional. None of the answers explains the problem which is thus further considered to be the continuum paradox. Although the infinitesimal calculus does not solve the continuum paradox, it finds a way to deal with it by introducing infinitesimals as infinitely small parts that are neither extensional nor non-extensional. Even if infinitesimals have no extension, they can compose a line.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-01-11
How to Cite
Dolenc, S. (2016). Less then Something, but More then Nothing - Zeno, Infinitesimals and the Continuum Paradox. Filozofski Vestnik, 23(3). Retrieved from https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3565
Issue
Section
Philosophy and Scientific Revolution
License
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter