Foucault’s Adventure in Iran and His Last “Turn”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.43.2.02Keywords:
Foucault, revolt, Jesi, the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the transcendental, the historical, KantAbstract
In light of the Iranian uprising of 1978–79, Foucault preferred to use the term revolt instead of revolution. In the first part of the article, we attempt to go beyond the limits of the nonspecific distinction he made between revolt and revolution by drawing on Furio Jesi’s phenomenology of revolt and showing in what sense the Iranian uprising can be considered a revolt. In the second part, the article highlights the connection between the Iranian uprising and Foucault’s later works by arguing that his adventure in Iran effectively shaped his final intellectual trajectory. By examining the tension between the transcendental and the historical in Foucault’s works, we propose to read his Iranian experience against the backdrop of such tension to better understand his different approach to the question of the transcendental in his final years.
Downloads
References
Agamben, Giorgio, “Absolute Immanence”, in Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy, trans. D. Heller-Roazen, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1999, pp. 220–239.
Cavalletti, Andrea, “Introduction”, trans. C. Viti, in F. Jesi, Time and Festivity, London, Seagull, 2014, pp. 1–21.
Cavaletti, Andrea, “Festivity, Writing, and Destruction”, Theory & Event, 22 (4/2019), pp. 1058–1068.
Cremonesi, Laura, Orazio Irrera, Daniele Lorenzini, and Martina Tazzioli, “Foucault, the Iranian Uprising and the Constitution of a Collective Subjectivity”, in L. Cremonesi et al. (eds.), Foucault and the Making of Subjects, London, Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd, 2016, pp.11–23.
Foucault, Michel, “An Historian of Culture: Debate with Giulio Preti (1972)”, trans. J. Becker and J. Cascaito, in S. Lotringer (ed.), Foucault Live (Interviews, 1961–1984), New York, Semiotext(e), 1989, pp. 95–104.
Foucault, Michel, “Pierre Boulez, Passing Through the Screen”, trans. R. Hurley, in Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology, J. D. Faubion (ed.), New York, The New Press, 1998, pp. 241–244.
Foucault, Michel, “Life: Experience and Science”, trans R. Hurley, in Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology, J. D. Faubion (ed.), New York, The New Press 1998, pp. 465–478.
Foucault, Michel, “Les ‘reportages’ d’idées”, in Dits et écrits II, 1976–1988, D. Defert and F. Ewald (eds.), Paris, Gallimard, 2001, pp. 706–707.
Foucault, Michel, The Archaeology of Knowledge, trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith, London, Routledge, 2002.
Foucault, Michel, “What is Enlightenment?”, trans. C. Porter, in Ethics: Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 1, P. Rabinow (ed.), New York, New Press 2003, pp. 303–320.
Foucault, Michel, “Is It Useless to Revolt?”, in J. Afary and K. B. Anderson, Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 263–267.
Foucault, Michel, “Iran: The Spirit of a World without Spirit”, in J. Afary and K. B. Anderson, Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 250–260.
Foucault, Michel, “Open Letter to Prime Minister Mehdi Bazargan”, in J. Afary and K. B. Anderson, Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 260–263.
Foucault, Michel, “Tehran: Faith against the Shah”, in J. Afary and K. B. Anderson, Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 198–203.
Foucault, Michel, “The Shah Is a Hundred Years Behind the Times”, in J. Afary and K. B. Anderson, Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 194–98.
Foucault, Michel, “What Are the Iranians Dreaming [Rêvent] About?”, in J. Afary and K. B. Anderson, Foucault and the Iranian Revolution: Gender and the Seductions of Islamism, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 203–209.
Foucault, Michel, The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981–1982, trans. G. Burchell, New York, Picador, 2005.
Foucault, Michel, “What Is Critique?”, trans. L. Hochroth and C. Porter, in The Politics of Truth, S. Lotringer (ed.), Los Angeles, Semiotext(e), 2007, pp. 41–81.
Foucault, Michel, and Sassine, Farès, “There Can’t Be Societies without Uprisings”, in Foucault and the Making of Subjects, in L. Cremonesi et al. (eds.), Foucault and the Making of Subjects, London, Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd, 2016, pp. 25–51.
Ghamari-Tabrizi, Behrooz, Foucault in Iran: Islamic Revolution after the Enlightenment, Minneapolis and London, University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
Jesi, Furio, Spartakus: The Symbology of Revolt, trans. Alberto Toscano, London, Seagull, 2014.
Jesi, Furio, Time and Festivity, trans. Cristina Viti, London, Seagull, 2021.
Koopman, Colin, “Historical Critique or Transcendental Critique in Foucault: Two Kantian Lineages”, Foucault Studies, 8 (2010), pp. 100–121.
Lemke, Thomas, Foucault’s Analysis of Modern Governmentality: A Critique of Political Reason, trans. E. Butler, London and New York, Verso, 2019.
Macherey, Pierre, “Foucault: Ethics and Subjectivity”, trans. T. Stolze, in In a Materialist Way: Selected Essays, W. Montag (ed.), New York and London, Verso 1998, pp. 96–107.
Malabou, Catherine, “Cynicism and anarchism in Foucault’s last seminars”, in P. Osborne (ed.), Afterlives: transcendentals, universals, others, Kingston upon Thames, U.K., CRMEP Books, 4 (2022), pp. 146–162.
Piasentier, Marco, “Foucault and the Two Approaches to Biopolitics”, in H. Richter (ed.), Biopolitical Governance: Race, Gender and Economy, London and New York, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2018, pp. 21–39.
Peden, Knox, “Foucault and the Subject of Method”, in P. Hallward and K. Peden (eds.), Concept and Form, Volume 2: Interviews and essays on Cahiers pour l’Analyse, New York and London, Verso, 2012, pp. 69–88.
Revel, Judith, “‘What Are We At the Present Time?’ Foucault and the Question of the Present”, in S. Fuggle et al. (eds.), Foucault and the History of Our Present, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. 2015, pp. 13–25.
Revel, Judith, “Between Politics and Ethics: The Question of Subjectivation”, in L. Cremonesi et al. (eds.), Foucault and the Making of Subjects, London, Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd, 2016, pp. 25–21.
Rilke, Rainer Maria, “Duino Elegies: The Sonnets to Orpheus”, trans. Robert Hunter, https://chimerapoetry.wordpress.com/2014/11/21/the-sonnets-to-orpheus-by-rainermaria-rilke/.
Whyte, Jessica, “Is revolution desirable?: Michel Foucault on revolution, neoliberalism and rights”, in B. Golder (ed.), Re-reading Foucault: On Law, Power and Rights, London, Routledge, 2012, pp. 207–228.
Zupančič, Alenka, “‘You’d have to be stupid not to see that’”, Parallax, 22 (4/2016), pp. 413–425.
Zupančič, Alenka, “Biopolitics, Sexuality and the Unconscious”, Paragraph, 39 (1/2016), pp. 49–64.
Zupančič, Alenka, “Hegel and Freud: Between Aufhebung and Verneinung”, Crisis & Critique, 4 (1/2017), p. 481–494.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
