On “One” (Thing) that is Missing in Lacanian Thought

Authors

  • Yücel Dursun

Abstract

This article demonstrates that Lacanian thought on One is narrow and does not completely cover the whole reality of One. A better understanding of One and Two could be facilitated by using the representation ‘#’, which can explain both disjunction and unity in language and thought. In addition, it presents some possibilities in abstract thinking. The first section of the paper considers Lacan’s doctrine on One and difference. The following section elaborates on the defect of this doctrine, focusing especially on its onesided apprehension, and introducing the derivation of the representation ‘#’. In the last section, the representation ‘#’ and its usage are briefly explained.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yücel Dursun

Yücel Dursun is an associate professor at the Department of Philosophy at Ankara University in Turkey. His academic interests are especially focused on French philosophy, classical German Idealism, the philosophy of mathematics, and play. He has recently been working on Badiou’s philosophy and the Two. His articles on Hegel’s dialectic play and the Two have been published in several national and international journals. He is the author of the book “Analytic/Synthetic Distinction in Philosophy and Mathematics” (in Turkish), Ankara, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2012-09-05

How to Cite

Dursun, Y. (2012). On “One” (Thing) that is Missing in Lacanian Thought. Filozofski Vestnik, 32(2). Retrieved from https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3238

Issue

Section

Compter avec le sujet / Counting with the Subject