Copernicus’ First Friends: Physical Copernicanism from 1543 to 1610

Authors

  • Katherine A. Tredwell
  • Peter Barker

Abstract

Between the appearance of Copernicus’ De Revolutionibus in 1543 and the works of Kepler and Galileo that appeared in 1609–10, there were probably no more than a dozen converts to physical heliocentrism. Following Westman we take this list to include Rheticus, Maestlin, Rothmann, Kepler, Bruno, Galileo, Digges, Harriot, de Zúńiga, and Stevin, but we include Gemma Frisius and William Gilbert, and omit Thomas Harriot. In this paper we discuss the reasons this tiny group of true Copernicans give for believing that Copernicus, not Ptolemy or Tycho Brahe, was correct. We conclude that the early followers of Copernicus can be divided into two main groups, designated mathematicians and physicists. Two main arguments appear in the works of the former: first, the relationship between the velocity of a planet and its distance from the center of the world; second, the explanation of retrogradations. Early Copernicans differed on the reality of celestial spheres, and several attempted to reconcile heliocentrism with scripture. The mathematicians continued to accept a traditional definition of the scope of astronomy and the methods of science, both issues challenged by Kepler and Galileo. Hence the work of Copernicus set in motion a train of events that led to a decisive epistemological shift, but did not itself represent such a shift. The real revolution is the replacement of the methods and goals of Ptolemaic astronomy and Aristotelian physics with Copernicanism in its modern form, which incorporates the conceptual structure of Kepler and the astronomical evidence of Galileo.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2007-01-01

How to Cite

Tredwell, K. A., & Barker, P. (2007). Copernicus’ First Friends: Physical Copernicanism from 1543 to 1610. Filozofski Vestnik, 25(2). Retrieved from https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3205

Issue

Section

Copernicus and the Philosophy of Copernican Revolutions