Lacan and Badiou: Logic of the Pas-Tout
Abstract
The fact that statements about "nothing" are, or are always equivalent to, a universal statement raises the question of a non-universalizable, non-completable nothing. Lacan’s pas-tout is an attempt to logically capture this incompleteness that can never be completed. While the pas-tout is relevant to the field of sexuation, its logic can be considered independent of it. This logic is, of course, a "deviant" logic, and for this reason raises questions about how it is to be interpreted. Alain Badiou criticizes Lacan for adopting a pre-Cantorian attitude towards the infinite and for advocating the strictures of intuitionism. I argue that Lacan is not an intuitionist but a constructivist about mathematics. I also consider Jacques-Alain Miller’s suggestion that Lacan’s pastout can be considered a variant of the Aristotelian negative particular statement, "Not all As are B" or "Not every A is B".Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2005-01-01
How to Cite
Grigg, R. (2005). Lacan and Badiou: Logic of the Pas-Tout. Filozofski Vestnik, 26(2). Retrieved from https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/filozofski-vestnik/article/view/3144
Issue
Section
Nothing on the Couch
License
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter