Unspeakable
Perversion, Psychoanalysis, Prosopopoeia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/fv.44.1.05Keywords:
Freud, Lacan, Miller, perversion, psychoanalysis, prosopopeiaAbstract
In order to speak in the voice of “the pervert,” psychoanalysis inevitably find itself performing the classic rhetorical act of prosopopoeia whereby an imagined, absent, or dead person is represented as speaking. To re-read Jacques-Alain Miller’s classic essay “On Perversion” (1996), for example, we find that the pervert is adjudged to be “unspeakable”—in every sense of that word—and so they can only be ventriloquized by the figure of the analyst. If the analyst seeks to speak on behalf of the pervert, however, this essay argues that the perverse speech act is itself a form of prosopopoeia which can ventriloquize the subject position of the hysteric, the neurotic, the psychotic, and even the analyst themselves. In conclusion, the essay argues that Miller’s account of the relationship between the analyst and the pervert, where each are seen to ventriloquize the other, bespeaks of a certain prosopopophilia—a love of prosopopoeia—that is the condition of being a speaking subject in the first place: I am always speaking for and as the other—even or especially when I am speaking as “myself.”
Downloads
References
Clausewitz, Carl von. On War. Edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Deans, Tim. “The Frozen Countenance of the Perversions.” Parallax 14, no. 2 (2008): 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534640801990608.
Dolar, Mladen. A Voice and Nothing More. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006.
Feher-Gurewich, Judith. “A Lacanian Approach to the Logic of Perversion.” In The Cambridge Companion to Lacan, edited by Jean-Michel Rabaté, 191–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Freud, Sigmund. “The Psychogenesis of a Case of Homosexuality in a Woman (1920).” In Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Group Psychology, and Other Works, 1920–1922, edited by James Strachey, 147–72. Vol. 18 of The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press, 1955.
Freud, Sigmund. Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality: The 1905 Edition. Edited by Philippe van Haute and Herman Westerink. Translated by Ulrike Kistner. London: Verso, 2016.
Hoens, Dominik. “Towards a New Perversion: Psychoanalysis.” In Jacques Lacan and the Other Side of Psychoanalysis: Reflections on Seminar XVII, edited by Justin Clemens and Russell Grigg, 88–103. Durham: Duke University Press, 2006.
Jacobus, Mary. “Russian Tactics: Freud’s ‘Case of Homosexuality in a Woman.’ ” GLQ 2, nos. 1 and 2 (1995): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2-1_and_2-65.
Lacan, Jacques. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Translated by Alan Sheridan. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, edited by Jacques-Alain Miller, book 11. New York: W. W. Norton, 1978.
Lacan, Jacques. “Kant with Sade.” In Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English, translated by Bruce Fink, 623–44. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.
Lacan, Jacques. La relation d’objet, 1956–1957. Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan, edited by Jacques-Alain Miller, book 4. Paris: Seuil, 1994.
Lacan, Jacques. Anxiety. Translated by A. R. Price. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, edited by Jacques-Alain Miller, book 10. Cambridge: Polity, 2016.
Lesser, Ronnie C., and Erica Schoenberg, eds. That Obscure Subject of Desire: Freud’s Female Homosexual Revisited. Philadelphia: Routledge, 1999.
Man, Paul de. “Autobiography as Defacement.” MLN 94, no. 5 (December 1979): 919–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2906560.
Miller, Jacques-Alain. “On Perversion.” In Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s Return to Freud, edited by Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, and Maire Jannus, 306–20. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996.
Žižek, Slavoj. “Desire: Drive=Truth: Knowledge.” Umbr(a): A Journal of the Unconscious, no. 1 (1997): 147–52.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ZRC-SAZU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit their self to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
More in: Submission chapter
