Magnitudes in Badiouʼs Objective Phenomenology and Economic Consumer Choice

  • Uroš Kranjc Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow. Department of Politics, University of York, United Kingdom
Keywords: Badiou, preference logic, utility theory, objective phenomenology, Marx, value form


The young Marx once remarked that political economy finds itself in an estranged form and is therefore in desperate need of a critical reconstruction of its object [Gegenstand]. He proposed a complete deconstruction of economic objectivity and its categories, hoping to recover the true species-life of man. In the article, we assert that contemporary economic theory remains confined by this estrangement, despite managing to ‘revolutionize’ itself out of the grip of classical political economy. The subjectivist-marginalist reliance on ‘measurable’ consumer preferences not only solidified the discipline’s estrangement, but also wrested away any remaining basic principles of economics through neoclassical reconceptualization. A break with estrangement would require novel critical economic thinking that would do away with the discontinuity between classical and neoclassical (contemporary) economics. It would therefore need a rich enough framework to scrutinize its principal categories. We argue that Alain Badiou’s objective phenomenology possesses a complementary synchronic structure able to conform to basic economic tenets, allowing for a comparative and synthetic approach. This would then be the basis for a new model of economic theorizing. We conclude the article with Marx’s value form, seeing it as a possible central category of a newly proposed economic framework.


Download data is not yet available.


Backhaus, Hans-Georg, “On the Dialectics of the Value-Form”, Thesis Eleven, 1 (1/1980), pp. 99–120.

Badiou, Alain, Logics of Worlds: Being and Event, 2, trans. A. Toscano, London, Continuum, 2009.

Badiou, Alain, Mathematics of the Transcendental, ed. and trans. A. J. Bartlett and A. Ling, London, Bloomsbury, 2014.

Behret, Hülya, “Group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 70 (2014), pp. 33–43.

Debreu, Gérard, Theory of Value an Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press 1971.

Goldblatt, Robert, Topoi: The Categorial Analysis of Logic, Mineola, NY, Dover Publications, 2006.

Heinrich, Michael, Die Wissenschaft vom Wert, Münster, Westfälisches Dampfboot, 2006.

Jevons, William S., The Theory of Political Economy, (5th ed.), New York, Augustus M. Kelley, [1871] 1965.

Kranjc, Uroš, “Logics of the Value Form – Marx with Badiou” Cosmos and History, 14 (3/2018), pp. 72–102.

Marcuse, Herbert, Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Ruse of Social Theory, (2nd ed.), London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1955.

Marx, Karl, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 / and the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Buffalo, NY, Prometheus Books, 1988.

Marx, Karl, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume One, London, Penguin books, 1993.

Wright, Georg H., “The Logic of Preference Reconsidered”, Theory and Decision, 3 (2/1972), pp. 140–163.

How to Cite
Kranjc U. Magnitudes in Badiouʼs Objective Phenomenology and Economic Consumer Choice. FV [Internet]. 2021Dec.31 [cited 2022Jan.28];42(1). Available from: