Non-Iranian origin of the Eastern-Slavonic god

The paper examines the traditional explanation of the Eastern-Slavonic deity Xors as an Iranian loan from the Persian xwaršēδ/xoršid ‘sun’ and advances an alternative etymology via the Indo-Aryan root hṛṣ-, Indo-European *g̑hersand its cognates in other Indo-European languages. Based on the linguistic and mythological comparative analysis Xors is interpreted not as an abstract ‘solar god’ but as a ‘sun fertility hero’ viewed as the development of the ancient archetype of the ‘dying and resurrecting god’ comparable in role to Dionysus. The paper closes with a brief outline of some new venues for research following out of the proposed reinterpretation of Xors.


'Iranian origin' theory of theonym 'Xors'
It has become a tradition to begin every account of the Eastern-Slavonic deity Xors 1 with the assertions 'one of the most mentioned' and 'one of the most mysterious'.This reflects the specific position of Xors in the Eastern Slavonic heathen pantheon.Indeed, in Russian ancient chronicles and religious texts Xors is the second most often mentioned heathen deity after Perun (Vasil'ev 1998) but we know next to nothing about his religious function despite the plethoric literature on this topic.The aim of this article is not to give yet one more assessment of various views on the nature of this deity 2 but to open a new perspective by applying methods of comparative linguistic and mythological analysis.
Even for the earliest researchers etymologising Xors presented a challenge.Interestingly, some of them (Tatiščev 1768;Glinka 1804;Russov 1824) connected this deity with 1 Cyrillic is conveyed according to the Scholarly (Scientific) transliteration system in which the Russian Cyrillic 'X' is transliterated as Latin 'X' and not as Latin 'H' but the Bulgarian Cyrillic 'X' is conveyed as 'H'.
In most of the old written sources the name appeared in Cyrillic as 'Xърсъ (Xŭrsŭ)' while the form 'Хорс (Xors)' is traditionally used in contemporary Russian literature.In some direct quotes using other transliteration systems it may be conveyed as 'Hors'. 2For the recent assessment of the history of this topic see Vasil'ev (1989;1998) and Beskov (2008).
At first glance, the reference to Maciej Stryjkowski regarding Xors may appear puzzling because nowhere in his description of the pre-Christian religious rites of the Slavs and Balts did Stryjkowski make a direct comparison of Xors with Bacchus.He wrote about Bacchus only once in his account of Greek deities: "[o]n the isle of Naxos [they venerate] Liberum or Baccus5 " (1846[1582]: 136) without any connection with Xors whom Stryjkowski only briefly mentioned in this chapter two pages further: "[t]hey [the Poles] praised also the Russian gods namely Piorun, Strib, Mokoss, Chorsum and others6 " (138).However, on p.142 Stryjkowski described the Old Prussian deity Curcho as "named Gurch who, as they believed, had power over livelihood, bread and people's food7 " and thus remotely resembling Bacchus.We shall return to Curcho later (3.3.2) but at this point it is noteworthy that in the early Russian studies Xors was clearly associated with Bacchus-Dionysus via the Baltic deity Curcho.
One of the first to suggest the Iranian link was P. G. Butkov who in his comments on Slovo o polku Igoreve named Xors "the Slavonic Phoebus 8 " and pointed out that 'sun' in Persian was "xuršit 9 , in Ossetic xur, xor; in Ossetic xorošŭ, хоrsŭ, xorsu also means dobro,  xorošo [kindness, good] 10 " (Butkov 1821: 61, cited by Vasil'ev 1998).Similarly, analysing Slovo Prejs (1841) also identified Xors as a solar god, noting though that "Xors is not just the sun but a mythological personality 11 " (36).In his view, the phonetic form of this word with the initial x was not native to the Russian speech: "[t]he word Xors [...] is an alien word; it is borrowed from the Aryan branch of languages 12 " (35).The Iranian origin was also supported by Bodjanskij (1846) who took Xors as "an alien word: namely Zendish 13 ".Although Sreznevskij (1846: 49-50) did not name Xors as a direct Iranian loan, he too wrote: "[o]ur scholar Prejs rightly compared Xorsŭ = Хоrŭsŭ with the New Persian Xor or Xur and with the name of the Persian King Koreš = Xoreš also meaning the sun 14 ".

Controversy of 'Iranian origin' theory
This etymology persisted into the 20th century and remains generally accepted today.Roman Jakobson most clearly expressed its essence as follows: "Xŭrsŭ is an obvious borrowing from the Iranian expression for the personified radiant sun (Xuršid in Persian)" (1949: 1027).This was later elaborated by Toporov (1989: 26-27) who believed that the name Xors was brought to Kiev with the solar cult by soldiers of the Khoresm garrison allegedly stationed there near the time of Vladimir's reign 15 .
Among the recent supporters of the solar nature of Xors is Mixail Vasil'ev, however, he was far from taking Xors as a straightforward Middle Persian (recent) borrowing but rather as: [...] an Iranian god by origin, a Sarmato-Alanian heritage in the Eastern branch of Slavonic, one of cultural reflexes of the deep Slavonic-Iranian interaction in Southern Europe existing for a long time in the first millennium B.C. which resulted in the imperceptible assimilation of Sarmato-Alans 16 .(Vasil' ev 1998).While explaining Xors through xwaršēδ/xoršid is firmly established among historians, linguists are more cautious about the presumed Iranian origin.In the relevant entry of the authoritative Russisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch Max Vasmer had to admit: The common derivation from Iran [ian], Avest [an] hvarə хšаētəm, mid.--Pers [ian] хvaršêt, new-Pers[ian] хuršēt "radiant sun" is not free of phonetic difficulties [...] 17 (Vasmer 1958: 3.265).Iranian hva-cannot explain the short vowel ъ (ŭ) in Xŭrsŭ and the Iranian š, being a product of retraction of s after r due to the 'RUKI sound law' 18 , could not become s in Slavonic.According to the same phonetic law, it would be expected to become x or, at least, remained as š if borrowed after the RUKI law stopped to operate. 19 There are also other, non-linguistic objections to the Iranian origin theory.Having identified Xors with the sun, Prejs still made this important observation: It remains to be mentioned that also the notions connected with the notion of Xors, do not have a root on the Slavonic soil.There is no doubt that the Slavs venerated the sun.However, if we trust the testimony of folk songs, in which antiquity often dwells unconsciously, the sun in Slavonic understanding was 15 See Valil'ev (1998) for a detailed criticism of this theory. 16"богом иранским по происхождению, сармато-аланским наследием у восточной ветви славянства, одной из культурных рефлексий существовавшего в течение длительного времени в I тыс.н. э. глубокого славяно-иранского взаимодействия, симбиоза на юге Восточной Европы, завершившегося нечувствительной ассимиляцией сармато-алан." 17 "Die verbreitete Herleitung aus d.Iran., avest.hvarə хšаētəm, mpers.хvaršêt, npers.хuršēt 'leuchtende Sonne' ist nicht ohne lautliche Schwierigkeiten [...]". 18Sound change attested in some IE languages (Albanian, Armenian, Baltic, Indo-Aryan, Slavonic) leading to the transition of the 'original' s to š or š/x (Slavonic) in positions after r, u, k and i .The change works without exceptions in Indo-Aryan (for which thus 'law' was originally formulated) but is not consistent in the Baltic languages.In Slavonic languages the change is regular but it only happens in positions with a following vowel where s changes to x, except for the front vowels e/i and the palatal approximant j where it becomes š. 19 See more on this in Abaev 1965: 155.an entity different from Xors.It appears not as a master, as in "Slovo" but as a mistress. 20(Prejs 1841: 37).The word *sŭlnĭсе 'sun' is neuter in Slavonic and clearly feminine in the related Baltic languages.Also, in many world's mythologies almost every major god was connected with the sun 21 so defining Xors as 'solar god' does not explain much.Moreover, from the context of Xors in Slovo some historians considered him, not without a reason, a lunar deity (e.g. Maksimovič 1859: fn. 45. pp. 110 -111).Another objection was raised by Valil'ev: Based on historical facts it is indeed impossible to explain when and under what conditions the Eastern Slavs or their ancestors could borrow from the inhabitants of Iran their cult of the Sun. 22 (Vasil' ev 1998).Certainly, this could not have happened near the period of Vladimir's reign (980 -1015 AD) because by that time Persia had already been converted to Islam.Also, to be borrowed and positioned as the second most important god, the Persian Xwaršēδ/Xoršid should have been a prominent Iranian deity but in New Persian this word simply means 'sun' without any religious connotation.In Zoroastrianism, the sun and other astral phenomena were indeed deified as 'nature gods' (Boyce, 1979: 6) but Hvar 'sun' was only one of many deities.Obviously, the name Xors could not have derived directly from Hvar (because of the final -s) and also from the Avestan hvarə хšаētəm since this expression only became contracted to xwaršēδ/xoršid in Middle Persian close to the period of the Sassanid dynasty .By that time the functions of the sun god Hvar had already been largely transferred on to Mithra/Miθra (Gershevitch, 1959: 35 -40) due to the rise of Mithraism in the pre-Sassanid period (Boyce, 1979: 99).The central deity of Mitharaism became Mihr (mid-Persian form of Mithra) which was also used as a synonym of 'sun'.The early Sassanid epoch was marked by the iconoclasm when statues of deities were removed from shrines replaced by sacred fires (ibid, 107).Therefore, by the time the proposed Iranian etymon xwaršēδ/xoršid appeared, any anthropomorphic images or statues of the sun-god (if they existed) had been destroyed and this word was losing its religious connotation and becoming to mean simply 'sun' as in modern Persian, while the functions of the sun-god Hvar were assumed by the reinterpreted Mithra/Mihr.It is indeed hard to imagine how the Eastern Slavs could have borrowed xwaršēδ/xoršid from Persia in this short period not only changing it to Xŭrsŭ/Xors (such a radical phonetic change is not characteristic of the attested Iranian loans in Slavonic) but also setting him up as one of the principal gods next in significance to the supreme deity Perun.

Possibility of 'non-Iranian' origin
As we can see, at closer examination the seemingly unquestionable explanation of Xors as a loan from Iranian and as 'solar god' is a facile solution having serious inherent flaws.Although not being a linguist, the Soviet ethnologist B. A. Rybakov, perhaps intuitively, felt the inconsistency of the Iranian loan theory since he suggested that the name Xors might not be a recent direct loan but could descend to the remote times of pra-Slavonic-Aryan contacts in the Eneolithic (Copper Age) period (Rybakov 1987: 440) thus pushing its origin back to at least the third millennium BC.
It is believed that at least from the 8 th century BC the vast area along the northern shores of the Black Sea was the domain of Iranian-speaking Scythians.The ethnolinguistic identity of Scythians remains a controversial issue but the prevailing opinion is that they spoke Eastern-Iranian dialects.This implies that they arrived to the Pontic-Caspian steppes from the region of today's Central Asia.If so, the Scythians represented a back-wave of an earlier eastward Indo-European (I-E) migration (Szemerenyi 1980: 5) which probably originated in the Pit-grave (Yamna) culture off the northern shore of the Black Sea at the end of the 3rd -beginning of the 2nd millennia BC (Kuz'mina 2007: 451).Therefore, the language of the bearers of the Pit-Grave culture could be rightfully considered as 'Proto-Indo-Iranian'.The Indo-Iranian homeland is usually located in the steppes north of the Black and the Caspian seas (Mallory 1989;Kuz'mina 2007) from where they are believed to have migrated to Southern Siberia (Andronovo culture ca. 1800-1400 BC) and then to Iran and Hindustan so, according to Kuz'mina (ibid.), the separation of the two branches happened within the Andronovo period.
The alternative and generally more plausible theory was offered by Safronov (1989) 23 who placed the Indo-Iranians deeper in time (ca. 3 rd millennium BC) and more westward to the Carpathians as part of the secondary Baden archaeological Proto I-E culture defined by him as the Graeco-Aryan-Thracian complex.Within this theory, the early Yamna culture (ca.3600 BC) was considered as ancient Indo-Iranian splitting at a later stage into the ancient Indo-Aryans (Kuban-Dnieper chariot culture) and ancient Iranians (the late Yamna culture) around 2500 BC (Safronov 1989;Nikolaeva 2007).Close to the time of the appearance of the bearers of the Catacomb culture (ca.2800-2200 BC) in Eastern Europe, the ancient Iranians departed eastwards beyond the Volga and then to Central Asia and the territories of modern Iran while the ancient Indo-Aryans crossed into Mesopotamia via the Caucasus and then to India (p.c.Nikolaeva 2014).
There is some linguistic evidence that an ethnos directly continuing the 'proto-Sanskrit' (non-Iranian) dialects lingered on in the northern Circum-Pontic area until the Sarmatian24 times: At least in the 1 st millennium BC the right-bank Ukraine was already a part (periphery) of the Slavonic linguo-enthnic space.Since the complexity of the ancient ethno-geography of Scythia is now revealing itself more and more insistently and we are arriving to the constatation of the actual preservation in its part (parts) along with the Iranian (Scythian) also of the Indo-Aryan (pra--Indian) component or its relics, there arises the rightful question about the re-ality of also Slavo-Indo-Aryan contacts approximately in the Scythian time. 25(Trubačёv 2003: 51).This theory was not unanimously accepted but even Trubačёv's opponents had to admit that such an approach would be justified because there is some linguistic support 26 for the possibility of the division of Iranian and Indo-Aryan branches before their eastward migration (Raevskij, 2006, 503 -507).The main objection of Raevskij, that it would be problematic for the descendants of Proto-Indo-Aryan dialects to keep their linguistic and cultural identity surrounded by Iranians, is based on a circular logic a priori presuming that all peoples occupying the vast Circum-Pontic area were 'Iranians', so it cannot be taken as a decisive argument.Besides, Trubačёv's opponents acknowledged that this did not "exclude, in principle, the possibility of preservation of certain Indo-Aryan relics 27 " (Grantovskij & Raevskij, 1980).Of these 'Indo-Aryan (pra-Indian) relics' the sacral lexicon and theonyms would have had a higher chance of being preserved.
The earliest attested form of Indo-Aryan is the language of the Vedas which is commonly referred to as 'Vedic (Sanskrit)'.The Eastern (Iranian) branch of Indo-Aryan was represented by Avestan.Sanskrit and Avestan are largely inter-comprehensible but have some significant differences in phonetics.One of the most obvious features is the change of the original I-E s, well preserved in Sanskrit, into h/x in Iranian.As the result, words as the Skr.svar 'the sun, sunshine, light, lustre; heaven (as a paradise and as the abode of the gods)' became hvar-, automatically excluding any chance of explaining the prominent Eastern Slavonic supreme deity Svarog as an Iranian loan.Because of the remarkable phono-semantic affinity it would be most natural to connect Svarog with the Sanskrit svarga 'heaven, the abode of light and of the gods' the only obstacle being the extreme spatial gap excluding any chance of a recent direct contact.However, this problem could be resolved if we hypothesise the existence of the non-Iranian 'Indo-Aryan (pra-Indian) component or its relics' on the linguistic periphery of the Slavonic world.
A detailed review of all aspects of Trubačёv's findings is beyond the scope of this article, however, the important implication is that we should not necessarily seek the origin of presumed Iranian loans in Slavonic ('Iranisms' in the Russian linguistic terminology) only in Avestan or middle and late Iranian dialects because some of them may derive from the residual Indo-European (Proto-Indo-Aryan) dialects.If we accept that 25 "Правобережная Украина по крайней мере в I тыс.до нашей эры уже была частью (переферией) праславянского лингвоэтнического пространства.Поскольку сейчас сложность древней этногеографии Скифии вырисовывается все более настойчиво и мы приходим к констатации реального сохранения на части (частях) ее территории наряду с иранским (скифским), индоарийского (праиндийского) ее компонента или его реликтов, встает уместный вопрос о реальности также славяно-индоарийских контактов приблизительно в скифское время." 26 The possibility of separation of Indo-Aryans and Iranians within the Central-Eastern European homeland was particularly supported by Safronov (1989).At the linguistic level this is confirmed by the unexplainable lack of proper 'Iranian' influence on Slavonic: "[t]his absence of Iranian influence on Slavonic is surprising in view of the repeated incursions of Scythian tribes into Europe, and the prolonged occupation by them of extensive territories reaching to the Danube.Clearly at this later period the Slavs must have remained almost completely uninfluenced politically and culturally by the Iranians.On the other hand at a much earlier period (c.2000 BC) before the primitive Aryans left their European homeland, Indo-Iranian and the prototypes of Baltic and Slavonic must have existed as close neighbours for a considerable period of time.Practically all the contacts which can be found between the two groups are to be referred to this period and this period alone" (Burrow 1955: 22). 27"в принципе не исключает возможности сохранения отдельных индоарийских языковых реликтов."the origin of Svarog28 could be Proto-Indo-Aryan then it would be justified to assume that the name of the other important deity Xors could also come from the same non-Iranian (Proto-Indo-Aryan) source.

Indo-Aryan parallels
The perception of Xors as a solar god of Iranian origin is still prevailing but there have been alternative theories29 .For instance, S. P. Obnorskij considered Xors as an old borrowing from Ossetic xorz meaning 'good' and explained the Russian adjective xorošij 'good' as originally meaning "of Xors, belonging to Xors" (Obnorskij 1929).This etymology found support in Abaev 30 (1949: 395 -396) but was firmly rejected by Vasmer 31 (1958:  3.265).Although Toporov did not support Ossetic as the immediate source of either Xors or xoroš, he too was inclined to see the connection between the two words: The only Russian word which has really been connected by researchers with the name of Xors is -xorošij.This link now appears unquestionable [...].Unquestionable is also the direction of the word formation: Xors → xorošij.It is only the concrete Iranian source of the name Xors that raises doubts. 32 (Toporov 1989: 37).The last phrase about the lack of a doubtless 'concrete Iranian source' is important as a frank admission that neither the Iranian xwaršēδ/xoršid nor the Ossetic horz provide an uncontroversial etymology of Xors.The attempt by Vasil'ev (1998) to resolve this problem by suggesting the hypothetical Sarmato-Alanian appellative *xors/*xūrs 'King Sun', derived by means of a complicated chain of assumptions, appears equally implausible because of the late origin of the contracted form xwaršēδ/xoršid and the phonetic difficulties discussed above.However, the obvious connection between Xors and xorošij could be of key significance if we refute the presumed 'Iranian' origin and examine the (non-Iranian) Vedic hṛṣu 33 'glad, happy'.This link was first mentioned in Gorjaev (1896: 400) but it has not been taken seriously mainly because of the controversial attitude towards any Russian word with an initial x34 .Since the initial x is considered non-native to Slavonic phonology, there is a tendency to view such words as loans, particularly as 'Iranisms' because of the large number of x-and h-initial words in Iranian languages arising from the original *s.In reality, Slavonic x only accidentally coincided with Iranian h/x (Trubačёv 2003: 51).
Apart from the difficulty with the initial x, Rus.xoroš-is a remarkably exact phono-semantic match to hṛṣu.In the Southern Slavonic languages the Sanskrit syllabic ṛ would be expected to correspond to -ŭr-and in pleophonic Eastern Slavonic languages to -oro-so h-ṛ-ṣu and x-oro-š agree phonetically in every detail.Semantically, while in Russian the cardinal meaning is only 'good' in a broad sense (nice, beautiful, pleasant, worthy etc.), the range of meanings of hṛṣ-is much wider.Its oldest (Vedic) meaning is (1) bristling, erection (esp. of the hair in a thrill of rapture or delight), (2) joy, pleasure, happiness; to be anxious or impatient for' and also 'to thrill with rapture, rejoice in the prospect of smth., exult, be glad or pleased' (also personified as a son of Dharma35 , (3) erection of the sexual organ, sexual excitement, lustfulness, (4) ardent desire.Thus, hṛṣu is about a specific kind of joy the nature of which becomes transparent if we consider the cardinal meaning of the respective verb hṛṣ -harṣati: 'becomes sexually excited; becomes erect or stiff or rigid, bristles (said of the hairs of the body)'.As one can see, hṛṣu means more than just 'pleasure' but specifically an utter carnal joy and pleasure when the hairs of the body bristle.

Indo-European perspective
Traditionally, hṛṣ is related to the non-conflicting hypothetical 'proto-form' *g̑hers-/*ghers-'to bristle' (Watkins, 2000, 30) or * g' h ers-( eh1)- (De Vaan, 2008: 289-290).It is believed that *g̑h/*g' h yielded χ (kh) in Greek and Proto-Italic: Greek chaírō (χαίρω) 'to be glad' and Proto-Italic *xors-ē-'to be stiff' leading to Latin hirsutus 'prickly' and horrere 'to bristle, shudder, look frightful'.According to the same theory36 , the reflex of *g̑h /*g' h in Slavonic is z (as in Avestan) and ž in Baltic while in Sanskrit its reflex would be h (as in hṛṣ).We do not know the timing and the causes of the presumed *g̑h/*g' h > z change in Slavonic and Iranian and > h in Indo-Aryan but there is a possibility that this split was already a feature of different 'Proto-Indo-Aryan' dialects.In fact, Trubačёv (1999: 239) gave three37 h-initial words in his list of the reconstructed relic Proto-Indo-Aryan vocabulary of which at least one word harmisia 'fortress' is clearly related to I-E *g̑her 'enclosure'.
According to De Vaan (2008: 290) "[t]he verb can be old, and so can the derivative in *-ōs-".At the late I-E stage the three g-less branches: Proto-Italic, Proto-Greek and Proto-Indo-Aryan probably overlapped in the area between the Balkans, Thracho-Phrygia, Danube and the Carpathians (Safronov 1989: 179-217;Nikolaeva 2007: 9) where the already g-less *hr(V)s could had been taken into the proto-Slavonic and proto-Baltic dialects with certain ancient loan-words.
Alternatively, it could have escaped the presumed Slavonic *g̑h/*g' h > z change due to various reasons (being an emphatic word, religious term, dialectal word etc.).
Exploring the etymology of xoroš(ij) 'good ' Toporov (1989: 36 -37) considered as its possible cognates xoroxorit'sja 'to swagger, to boast (lit.'to stick up' -said of a cock's comb), xorzat' 'to get a swelled head, to boast' and xarzit'(sja) 'to become exited or angry'.He rightly noted that both words had a common semantic element 'to grow big, increase in size' but considered them as a development of Iranian xvar 'sun' based on a doubtful comparison with the sun rising and getting optically bigger at sunrise/sunset.While such etymology is questionable, these words may indeed be related if we view them in connection with the secondary meaning of hṛṣu 'telling lies' (i.e.boasting) and the nominative form harṣa having a wide array of meanings mentioned in 2.1..In this context Rus.xoroš-may be viewed as a relic of the ancient fertility cult38 developing semantically along the line 'worthy, good' < 'fertile' < 'sexually potent' < 'erect' < 'to bristle'.This chain of logical connections may appear far-fetched but De Vaan (2008: 290) proposed the same course of development for the reconstructed I-E etymon *g' h er-i-: "'to enjoy' < 'to be excited' < 'to stick out (?)'" leading to the Greek chaírō (χαίρω) 'to be glad', and Sanskrit harayati 'to enjoy'.
It is important to stress that although the theonym Xors, Russian xoroš, xorošij and Sanskrit hṛṣu may come from the same ancient root, this does not mean that they derive directly from one another.Understanding the primordial semantics of this root may help in explaining the otherwise obscure meaning of xoroš as 'lover', as well as the mysterious xorošul' 'type of round ritual bread' preserved in some Russian dialects (Dal' 1909(Dal' : 1224;;Rybakov 1980: 434) and also give us a glimpse into the nature of 'mysterious' Xors.

'Sun god' or 'sun fertility hero'?
To summarise, we may say that the ancient root hṛṣ belongs to the deepest layer of the archaic lexicon relating to procreation and fertility and, by its association with Dharma, it is also linked to the fundamental concept of ṛta 'fixed or settled order' which, in its turn, is organically connected with the notions of kāla 'a fixed or right point of time, a space of time, time (in general) 39 , season' and kālacakra 'the wheel of time' taken as the eternal cycle of rebirth and death expressing the Vedic world-view: [...] the ancient nucleus of the RV [Rigveda] is represented by the myths of the cosmogonic theme and the primary meaning of the whole collection was to serve the ritual connected with the change of the yearly cycle which was understood as the destruction of the universe, its sinking into the chaos and its new resurrection i.e. restoring the cosmic order.40(Elizarenkova 1982: 25).
Importantly for this discussion, as a noun hṛṣu was also used as a theonym and stood for (1) Agni or fire 41 , (2) the sun and (3) the moon.In the Hindu tradition Agni is the second in importance to the thunder-god Indra and this kind of relationship exactly mirrors that of Perun and Xors.Although Agni is mainly a personification of the sacrificial fire (cp.Slavonic *ognĭ 'fire') he also has clear solar features: he shines like the sun and disperses darkness.Like Apollo, Agni drives a shiny golden chariot drawn by two ruddy steeds and even the sun is regarded as his form.His animal form is a bull or a horse but he often takes the form of a divine bird: an eagle of the sky.He is a son of Heaven and Earth.As a fire being produced every morning Agni is ever young.Notably, one of his many epithets is dvi-janman 'having two births' (Macdonell 1917: 1-3).Thus the character of Agni combines the features of Helios, Eros, Ares and Dionysus.
The closely related harṣa was also used as an epithet of an Asura 42 and as an appellation of the son of Krishna.In the popular Hindu mythology 'son/daughter of god' should not be taken literary in terms of conventional genealogy because god's offspring were often seen as personifications of certain features of the parent deity and its incarnations (Avatars) 43 .Krishna gained a special importance in the post-Rigvedic period but in the earliest texts he was mentioned primarily as the full incarnation of the Rigvedic Vishnu.They were so closely interrelated that Krishna was sometimes directly identified with Vishnu so E. W. Hopkins (1915: 3) occasionally used the joint name Krishna-Vishnu 44 .Importantly, in Mahābhārata 45 one of the forms of Krishna -Krishna-Gopala 46 was depicted as a "young and amorous shepherd with flowing hair and a flute in his hand" (Monier-Williams 1899: 306).Although indirect, the intricate union of the 'young and amorous god', so reminiscent of Cretan young Zeus, Greek Dyonisus and Kouros and being the important part of the 'Hindu triad' (Brahma -creator, Vishnu -preserver and Shiva -destroyer), with harṣa is significant.
If we accept this new etymological link (putting aside for now the problematic s||š correlation) then instead of an abstract 'solar god' or the even more abstract "deity of the solar disc" (Rybakov 1987: 444) Hṛṣu/Xors would emerge as a typical 'fertility hero' or a 'sun hero'.Of course, a sun hero is related to the sun by decent but, as Eliade noted: [...] we must be careful not to reduce the sun hero to being simply a physical manifestation of the sun; neither his structure nor his place in myth is confined to merely the phenomena of the sun (dawn, rays, light, twilight, and so on).A sun hero will always present in addition a "dark side", a connection with the world of the dead, with initiation, fertility and the rest.(Eliade 1958: 159-150). 41Possibly, also influenced by the partial homophone haras 'flame, fire'. 42In the Vedic period Asuras were believed to be benevolent deities. 43A good example of the typical god-son relations is the story of Gādhi in Mahabharata: "Kuṣika [name of a prince] is permeated with Indra, and Gādhi, son of Kuṣika, is in reality son of Indra; in other words, for the purpose of having a son Gādhi, Indra becomes incorporate; Gādhi is Indra on earth" (Hopkins 1915: 3). 44Kṛṣṇa -Viṣṇu. 45Mahābhārata is by far the largest and one of the most important pieces of the Indian Sanskrit literature.It is sometimes referred to as 'The Great Epic' by analogy with the Greek epic poems.Although it was composed in the post-Vedic times, it represents the culmination of a lengthy tradition of oral poetry (Brockington 1998).Some of the personages of the Epic can be traced to legends and tales going back to the beginning of the Vedic times (Hopkins 1902: 286). 46Sanskrit gopāla 'cowherd' may be literally interpreted as 'protector of cattle'.
Refuting the interpretation of Xors as an abstract 'solar god' or the 'personification of the sun' opens new interesting venues of research.Because of the limited volume of this paper, they can only be briefly outlined.The following text should not be treated as the Author's endeavour to give bold solutions to various mythological topics, many of which have been debated for decades, but solely as a tentative try to cast an alternative view from a different perspective and, possibly, stimulate a discussion.

Archaism of Slavonic language and mythology
In early historical linguistic studies Slavonic was routinely presented as 'young language' and a target for borrowing from more 'ancient' surrounding languages.Oleg Nikolajevič Trubačёv in his book Ėtnogenez i kul'tuta drevnejšix slavjan (2003) questioned such widespread presumptions and also the theory of the recent 'arrival' of Slavs from a small 'homeland'.Instead, he postulated the inherent multi-dialectal character of early Slavs spread over a large territory of Central and Eastern Europe with the core in the Middle Danube Region.As to the dating of these dialects Trubačёv wrote: Currently, there is an objective tendency to deepen the dating of ancient Indo-European dialects.This also applies to Slavonic as one of the Indo-European dialects.However, the question now is not that the history of Slavonic may be measured by the scale of the II to III millenniums B.C. but that we can hardly date the 'emergence' or 'separation' of pra-Slavonic or pra-Slavonic dialects from Indo-European dialects because of the proper uninterrupted Indo-European origin of Slavonic. 47(Trubačёv 2003: 25).The concept of the "Indo-European archaism of Slavonic Language and culture 48 " (182) and its inherent poly-dialectal nature should equally apply to the Slavonic mythology and pre-Christian religion.Trubačёv spoke against simplistic attempts to 'reconstruct' the Indo-European religion only as a retrospective projection of the elaborated pantheons of Greece, Rome and ancient Indo-Iran.Such an approach would be particularly unfruitful for establishing the I-E identity of Slavonic heathen deities as it is often impossible to link them clearly to the prominent figures of classical pantheons.He believed that the reason for this was not the scarcity of written sources or some particular 'forgetfulness' of Slavs but the difference in the cultural stage.According to Trubačёv, it would be "[m]ore natural and logical to presume with pra-Slavs in these cases the reflection of a more archaic stage 49 " (2003: 196).The archaism of Slavonic culture was also noted by E. Gasparini who wrote that "the Slavic society presents 47 "B настоящее время отмечается объективная тенденция углубления датировок истории древних индоевропейских диалектов, и это касается славянского как одного из индоевропейских диалектов.Однако вопрос сейчас не в том, что древняя история праславянского может измеряться масштабами II и III тыс.до н.э., a в том, что мы в принципе затрудняемся даже условно датировать "появление" или "выделение" праславянского или праславянских диалектов из индоевропейского именно ввиду собственных непрерывных индоевропейских истоков славянского." 48 "индо-европейский архаизм славянского языка и культуры" 49 "[г]ораздо естественней предположить у праславян в этих случаях отражение архаической стадии".itself as the most archaic one to which the ethnological sciences permit to descend in Europe 50 " (1960: 21).
Importantly for the following discussion, Trubačёv particularly stressed that for Slavs the characteristic feature was not the worshipping of a set of formal anthropomorphic deities but, mainly, "seasonal rituals similar to those related to the name of a straw doll at seeing-off of spring 51 " (2003: 196).Thus, if one has to draw parallels between Slavonic and Greek cults, the comparison should be done with the most archaic layer such as the Minoan religion which similarly "lacked genuinely aesthetic representations of its divinities" (Persson 1942: 8) and was also focused on seasonal fertility rituals.At the centre of these rites were the Great Goddess and her mortal but ever resurging male consort resembling the Phrygian Attis (Evans 1921: 161-162) and Dionysus to whom Farnell referred as "Zeus-Dionysus of Crete" (1896: 612). 52

'Dyonisiac complex' and fertility cult
Although Dionysus is commonly known as the 'god of wine', this is only one aspect of the nature of this important deity intricately connected with the cult of fertility.The rites associated with his cult "were ecstatic and sensual" (De Rose & Garry 2005: 21) which precisely matches the cardinal meaning of hṛṣu.Dionysus was also worshipped as the god of trees and vegetation in general (Frazer 1922: 387;Seaford 2006: 22-23) but at the same time he was often imagined in an animal form as a bull or a goat having clear ithyphallic traits: The Hellenes regarded the bull and the goat as his [Dionysus] frequent embodiments, and in ritual employed the phallos, the human generative organ as the symbol of his productive powers [...].(Farnell 1909: 97).These obvious links with fertility and the manhood are in perfect agreement with the semantics of hṛṣu.In this context the Latin hircus 'he-goat, buck' can hardly be a mere coincidence.
The origin of the Dionysian cult is believed to be Thraco-Phrygian (Farnell 1909: 86).Although the solely Thracian origin is now debated (e.g.Archibald 1999: 432), even if it originated elsewhere, the fact that this cult was particularly strong close to the area where Trubačёv (2003) placed the core of the proto-Slavonic tribes is highly significant.It is also important that it is in the Balkans where we find the names like Krestonia (Κρεστονία) and Cherso (Χέρσο) 53 , Bulgarian place names Hǎrsovo 54 , Romanian city Hârșova (Hîrșova) and also words like the Greek cháris (χάρις) 'beauty, delight' and Bulg.haresam '(I) like, love' -all phonetically and semantically compatible with harṣa.Not only do these words fall into the semantic field of hṛṣu/harṣa but they obviously come from non-RUKI dialects since they keep the unchanged -rs as in Xors.The possible connection of Hǎrsovo and Xors has already been proposed by Kalojanov (2000).He gave 50 "la società slava si presenta come la più arcaica alla quale le scienze etnologiche permettono a resalire in Europa." 51"сезонные обряды вроде того, который обозначается названием соломенной куклы на проводах весны". 52See more on the Cretan connection of Dionysus in Kerényi & Manheim (1976). 53Where, incidentally, was located the temple of Dionysus (Farnell 1909: 90). 54Хърсово.
an impressive list of Bulgarian place names with the root hǎrs-but being constrained by the conventional interpretation of Xors as an Iranian solar deity could not convincingly ground his theory of its South-Eastern and Balkan origin.
The obvious similarities between the traits of Dionysus and other deities related to the concept (archetype55 ) of the seasonal "decay and revival of vegetation" (Frazer 1922: 393) and the idea of the seasonal cycle of death and re-birth (the dying and resurrecting god) of nature are well known (e.g.Seaford 2006: 23).Among the most prominent figures are Middle-Eastern Attis, Egyptian Osiris and Greek Adonis.Given the archaism of Slavonic culture, relics of this ancient archetype should be reflected in its mythology.Exploring the history of the 'Dionysiac complex ' Toporov (1984) saw its clear manifestations in the Slavonic folklore and rituals connected with marriage, new-year traditions and seasonal feasts.

Thracian Dionysus and the Slavs
As mentioned earlier, seasonal rites were central to the religion of the early Slavs.They survive to this day in the form of folk festivals where the main event is the chasing away of winter, welcoming of spring and the start of the new calendar year.Spring festivals are common across Europe but this tradition is especially popular with Slavonic peoples to such an extent that some German scholars believed that it was Slavonic in origin (Frazer 1922: 309).More likely, though, that it continues the extremely ancient base myth56 known as hierós gámos (ἱερός γάμος) 'the divine marriage' which may be traced to the cult of the 'Great Mother (Goddess)' taking its beginning in the Palaeolithic times.Central and Eastern Europe was the area of the oldest 'Great Mother' figurines bearing explicit fertility connotations.One can see here a continuous tradition stretching back to at least 25-30 Kya., subdued during the Last Glacial Maximum but springing up again in the "Mythological crescent" (a term proposed in Haarmann & Marler 2008) around the 8th millennium BC.In South-Eastern Europe these figurines reappeared in mass in the Cucuteni-Trypillian culture from ca. 5500 BC and the Great Mother had remained the centre of the earliest Thracian, Phrygian and Minoan cults: In the houses, statuettes have been found that must be interpreted as idols.They are mostly female with strongly stressed sex properties.Male statuettes are phallic.We can infer that the religion of this agricultural population was centred on a fertility cult whose main figure was a Mother Goddess.(Katičić 1976).It is believed that the main function of 'Great Mother' was "the creation and maintenance of the Universe in the form of the constant cycle of rebirth of life"57 (Nikolaeva 2010a: 101).
We may assume that traces of this ancient cult should be preserved in the Slavonic mythology and religion, at least due to the geographical closeness.Indeed, the Slavonic New Year festival koljada reflects the 'dyonisiac complex' in all major details: To die, give birth and be reborn are agrarian concepts of the vegetal and animal life, whence the scenes of coitus, killing and the birth of koljada.58(Gasparini 1973: 445) Dionysus is not a Thracian word but the names of Zamolxis and Sabazios, attested in some Thracian inscriptions, could have been his local appellations (Farnell 1909: 94).These names are, obviously, difficult to connect phonetically with Xors yet there may be a link joining the Thracian Dyonisus with the Slavs.According to Herodotus, the Thracians worshipped the triad: Dionysus, Ares and Artemis.The latter may be the Greek equivalent of the local goddess Semele.Importantly, Semele is cognate with one of the I-E words for 'earth' well preserved in Slavonic: zemlja/zemja.We may thus connect the Thracian Semele and Phrigyan Zemélō (ζεμέλω) 'Earth-mother' (Fasmer 1964(Fasmer -1973: 2,93) : 2,93) with the Slavonic archetype of Mat'-(syra)-Zemlya 'Mother-(moist)-Earth' and Lithuanian Žemė Pati 'Earth Spouse' or Žemyna -the female deity of the earth, harvest and fertility59 .Since Dionysus was believed to be the son of Artemis/Semele, she could be an important link bridging the ancient Thracian and Slavonic cults and implying the existence in the Slavonic and Baltic mythology of a fertility deity similar in role to Dionysus of Thrace.

Parallels in Baltic mythology
As mentioned earlier, Xors could not have derived directly either from the -rṣ RUKI form harṣa or, even less so, from the Persian xwaršēδ/xoršid.Its original protoform should have been *h(V)rs-(V stands for 'vowel') which would be expected to remain unchanged in the non-RUKI languages but become *h(V)rx in the -rx RUKI languages (Slavonic) and *h(V)rš in -rš RUKI languages (Baltic, Indo-Aryan) if it were inherited directly from I-E, or remain as *h(V)rs if borrowed from a non-RUKI dialect.Finding the relevant reflexes of the etymon *h(V)rs-in Slavonic and Baltic among deities similar in role to Dyonisus would deliver the final blow to the 'Iranian loan' theory.
Indeed, we do find in the Baltic area the -rx reflex in the name of the Old Prussian god of vegetation Curcho60 .According to some historians (Mone 1822;Grunau and Perlbach 1876), Curcho came to the Prussians from the neighbouring Slavonic Mazurians (-rx/-rš RUKI language).Phonetically, the development *h(V)rs > *kh(V)rs61 > *k(V)rx (RUKI law) to the Old Prussian *kurk would be natural since Old Prussian did not have a phonological x (kh).The mentioning of the Sorbian deity Kruh by Christian (1767: 22) in relation to Curcho gives some extra support to the Slavonic origin theory.
The religious function of Curcho has been debated (e.g.Pisani 1950;Puhvel 1974;Toporov 1984;Narbutas 1995;Kregždys 2012) but there is a consensus that this deity was related to the sphere of fertility.Interpreting Curcho purely as a fertility god was particularly promoted by Rolandas Kregždys (2009;2012) based on the attested association of Curcho with a well-known fertility symbol -the bull.Notably, the bull was also believed to be the embodiment of Dyonisus.A direct attempt to associate Curho and Xors was done in Hanusch (1842: 226) and it was later developed in Narbutas (1994: 156): "Curcho may be compared with the Kievan god Chors 62 ".Although this theory was based on some questionable presumptions, for which it was rightly criticised in Kregždys (2009: 261-262), the new etymology proposed here could give this comparison a more sound basis.The characteristic features of Dyonisus (seasonal deity, hilarious god of wine) are also easily recognizable in the description of Curcho by Franz Mone: The image of the Curcho was destroyed after the harvest and re-done annually, he was the protector of all field fruits, food and drink was in his care, he was a cheerful table God. 63 (Mone, 1822, 95).It is also that some researchers (Narbutas, 1995) saw Curcho as a relic of the ancient Mother Goddess cult being the son or husband of Žemyna whose connection to the Thracian Semele and her son Dyonisus has already been mentioned.
We may also tentatively bring up the Lithuanian 'corn spirit' Kuršis personified by a straw figure (Ivanov and Toporov, 1987: 154).Phonetically, Curcho could not have given Kuršis since it is believed that within the RUKI process both -rx and -rš forms developed from -rs independently.Therefore, we may hypothesise that Prussian Curcho and Lithuanian Kuršis could be parallel developments of *h(V)rs 64 : the former coming via Slavonic and the latter being the Baltic form.
The common feature of Zeleni Juraj, Jarowit, Jarylo, Jurij/Egorij/Georgij is that they were usually imagined as heroes on a (white) horse 66 from which we may draw a direct parallel with the images of the 'Thracian horseman' -Heros.It is important that depictions of the Heros often contained ritualistic objects and symbols of fertility: altar, fire, snake, the sacred tree etc. (Toporov 1992) but were also clearly connected with the cult of the dead (Boteva 2011: 100).
The Greek hḗrōs (ἥρως) 'hero' is usually etymologised as 'protector' and associated with Latin seruāre 'to safeguard' (e.g.Partridge 1977: 1417) but Toporov (1992) offered a radically new etymology through the same I-E *iero; *ioro 'year; spring' thus directly linking hḗrōs with hō̂ros (ὧρος) 'time, season', Avestan yar-, 'year', German Jahre (id.), Slavonic jara 'spring; vehement, fervent' and, consequently, with Jarowit and Jarilo.The name Xors could not derive directly from hḗrōs since the final -s in the Greek word is morphological (Nom., m., sing.) but it may be otherwise related to Heros because certain Thracian inscriptions are interpreted by some scholars in the sense that "where the Thracian Horseman is concerned the meaning of 'Heros' is not entirely similar to the Greek word" (Boteva 2011: 86).Dilyana Boteva believed that the name might be connected with Greek Érōs ( Ἔρως) 67 'Eros < love, mostly of the sexual passion' and not with hḗrōs (2002: 819).She quoted from Plato's Syposium an account of Eros as a messenger between the worlds of men and gods (idem) and drew direct parallels with the Thracian Heros.Commenting on the draft of this paper, Dilyana Boteva noted that her interpretation of Heros as a divine messenger "leads in a totally different direction" (p.c.2013).In fact, the new vision of Xors/ hṛṣu exactly matches the character of Eros and is also not in conflict with the parallels with Dyonisus who was similar to Eros in many ways: Another peculiar pair of divinities in classical religion is Aphrodite and Eros.I am not at all convinced that Eros is to be considered as the first personification within Greek religion.It is my opinion that he is the direct successor to the young Cretan god, closely related to Adonis and Attis, and that all of them are associated with the great Goddess of Fertility, the Goddess of Love.(Presson 1942: 151).The role of Eros, described in Syposium as a messenger, may also be fully applied to Vedic Agni one of whose epithets was hṛṣu: He [Agni] both takes the offerings of men to the gods and brings the gods to the sacrifice.He is thus characteristically a messenger 68 (dūtá) appointed by gods and by men to be an 'oblation bearer'.(Macdonell 1917: 2) Some researchers believe that Heros could be directly linked to the name of the legendary Prince Rhesos (Ῥῆσος) featured in Thracian epic tales as having a chariot drawn by white horses (Farnell 1909: 100) and the Thracian king Rhesos mentioned by Homer (Toporov 1992: 12).In the beginning of a word Ῥ is pronounced as hr so Rhesos and Xors are compatible phonetically.While the final -s is clearly morphological, the medial -s-is part of the root. 66See more on this in Ivanov & Toporov (1974: 180-216) and Sokolova (1979: 155-185). 67Of unknown etymology. 68E.g. in Rig Veda verse 1.059.02:"mūrdhā divo nābhir agniḥ pṛthivyā athābhavad aratī rodasyoḥ" [Agni (is) the head of the Sky, the navel of the Earth.He became the messenger of the two worlds].
Importantly, in the legend Rhesos was directly compared to Dionysus.After his death Rhesos was placed in a cavern "of the silver land, half-human, half-divine with clear vision (in the dark), even as a prophet of Dionysos took up his abode in the rocky Pangaean Mount" (Farnell 1909: 100)  69 .Liapis (2011) highlighted the striking parallels between the characters of Heros and Rhesos and the obvious links with the Thracian Orphic and Dionysiac cults.
Finally, it is possible that the name of the 12th century Macedonian ruler Dobromir Hrs could also be related here as proposed by Čausidis (2003: 236-247).Moreover, Rhesos would be in all respects more plausible as the possible source of the Slavonic theonym Xors than the controversial Iranian xwaršēδ/xoršid.

Kresnik, Vesnik, Kurent and Xors
Another interesting personage closely connected with Zeleni Juraj is the Slovenian Kresnik (Krsnik, Skrstnik) who is also dubbed "controversial and mysterious" (Šmitek 1998) like Xors.The origin of the name and the function of this deity are not clear.There have been attempts to link Kresnik with Xors but they were lost in the wake of the presumed Iranian origin of Xors as a 'personified sun'.In Russia the first historian to connect, although indirectly, Xors and Kresnik was Efimenko (1868): who, although mistakenly linking хоrt 'hound' 70 with Xors, mentioned that Xors could be related to the Old Czech kres 'fire' and O.C.S kresŭ 'revival, resurrection'.Both words do not have a reliable explanation but the new etymology proposed here may give a fresh impetus to this theory since the meaning of Xors/Hṛṣu unites the concepts of the personified fire and the sun with the archetype of the ever reviving sun fertility hero.The nature of Kresnik combines the distinct features of a 'young sun hero' 71 attributed to the Eastern Slavonic thunder-god Perun by Mikhailov (1996Mikhailov ( , 1998) ) but also those typical of the Slavonic spring fertility mythological complex: His [Kresnik] belonging to the celestial spheres, certain connection with the weather and atmospheric phenomena (thunder, lightning, storm) and fertility is more than obvious 72 .(Mikhailov 1996: 137).Krestnik appears as a hero warrior but also as a benevolent fertility god fused in many ways with the spring deity Vesnik: "myths about him [Vesnik] are difficult to keep separate from those of Kresnik" (Copeland 1931).The story of Kresnik's death is characteristic: on the one hand, it has clear analogies with the 'dying and resurrecting god' concept since Kresnik does not really die.Like the mythical Rhesos "[h]e is only under a spell, and waits in his grave or in a mountain cavern for the hour of his awakening and return to true life" (ibid.).On the other hand, there is a direct link with another Slovene mythical hero Kurent personifying a variation of the same general mythologeme: a hero retreating to the realm of death (the moon in this case) and returning again.The new vision of Xors as reflecting the 'Dionysiac complex' at the core of the Slavonic mythology may help to clarify this ambiguity.

Inherent duality of 'sun fertility hero'
In the oldest Laurentian Codex (PVL 1377: 25) Xors appeared as a doublet Xŭrs Daž'bog 73 so Rybakov believed that Xors was an "inseparable addition to the image of Daž'bog-Sun 74 " (1987: 444).Such duality, which is difficult to explain of a purely solar deity, may become clearer if we look at Xors as a sun fertility hero, the inherent duality of whom has already been mentioned, and compare Xors with Dionysus: His personality is marked by ambiguities: born twice Dionysos displays divine, human and animal traits.[...] Dionysos has both masculine and feminine traits.Embodying the vitality of life on one hand, he also has marked connection with the dead and afterlife on another.He comes and disappears.(Versnel 2011: 38).Double-faced representations of Dionysus as Zeus (as the Zeus's youthful aspect) are among the oldest in Greece (Deedes 1935: 217-218).In his article Deedes gave an interesting image of Dionysus on a lekythos as two bearded masks hung back-to-back on a pillar.The young face could be taken as the image of Zeus-young-hero (Kouros) and the old face for Zeus as 'Father of Gods and men'.It is significant that it was Crete where "both the cult of Dionysus and that of Zeus were celebrated [...] in orgiastic manner" (Deedes 1935: 219) and it was also the place where the cult of the Great Goddess flourished 75 .Importantly, Thracian Dionysus and Ares were also often perceived as a single deity so Farnell even used in their respect a compound name " Ares-Dionysus" (1909: 104).
Dionysus has also been associated with the double axe from early times (Georgoudi 2011: 56).Depictions of Zeus-Dionysus as a double faced profile with the double-axe on the reverse became common in the Aegean area from 500 BC.According to Margaret Waites (1923), the double axe was originally a symbol of the great earth-goddess symbolising the union of her male and female elements (Deedes 1935: 211).With the 'masculinisation' of the ancient cults this duality could become reinterpreted as the union of Zeus and Dionysus.This custom of a double-faced Zeus-Dionysus spread later to Italy, Sicily, Central Europe and the British Isles although instead of the double axe on the reverse of the coins appeared either a club, representing the life-giving bow of the Tree of Life, or a horse (sometimes a boar) which are well-recognised fertility symbols.

Xors-Daž'bog as the Eastern-Slavonic reflection of duality concept
Nikos Čausidis (2000) explored the puzzling dual nature of Daž'bog combining both solar and chthonic aspects and proposed the existence of "two Dažbogs: an Estern-Slavic, Solar Dažbog and the chthonic deity of the South Slavs" (2000, 41) stemming from a 'common prototype': "primary male deity" (ibid.).The new interpretation of Xors-Daž'bog as a 'sun fertility hero' and as a Slavonic analogue of the Zeus-Dionysus concept may add clarity to this complicated issue.The parallels with the Iranian triad: 'primo-73 "ХЪРСAДАЖЬБ[ОГ]А". 74"неотъемлимое дополнение к образу Дажьбога-Солнца". 75Recent genetic studies have revealed a remarkable affinity between the modern inhabitants of the Cretan Lasithi Plateau (the centre of the Great Goddess cult) and the Balkan peoples: "Y-STR-based analyses demonstrated the close affinity that R1a1 chromosomes from the Lasithi Plateau shared with those from the Balkans, but not with those from lowland eastern Crete" (Martinez et al. 2007) so the striking resemblance between the ancient Cretan and Balkan fertility cults may not be accidental.
genitor' Z'rvan = Svarog and his sons Ormazd (Ahura Mazda) = Svarožič and Ahriman = Dažbog drawn by Čausidis appear correct but, in my opinion, there is no need to seek the explanation solely in the presumed Iranian76 influence on Slavs as this may be a parallel development of the same ancient base myth.The Indo-Aryan analogue of Xors-Daž'bog could be the Hindu concept of Rudra-Shiva displaying a similar duality: […] Rudra-Śiva is both the god of procreation and destruction.He impersonates the generating power worshipped in the liṅga77 ; similarly he reduces to ashes the god of 'desire' or sexual love, Kāma […].(Charkavarti 1994: 45).Another parallel may be drawn with the Prussian Curcho who, being a fertility deity, also has chthonic features (Kredzys 2009: 293 -294) and the concept of the 'sun fertility hero' in general.
An even more archaic reflection of the ancient duality concept can be found in the Eastern Slavonic vernal and summer rites where the main heroes Kostroma and Jarilo display a mixture of male and female traits.

'Sun fertility hero' and archetype of divine trinity
As already mentioned, the Thracians worshipped the trinity: Dionysus, Ares and Artemis.The concept of trinity is pervasive in the Indo-European mythology.Waites sought its origin in the "idea of a division of the divine nature between a god and a goddess who, together with their child, form a natural trinity, glorifying and repeating on their divine plane the life of the human family" (1923: 34).In the process of 'masculinisation' the female goddess was replaced by the sky-god and the two male elements became perceived as twin-gods: "[w]ith the predominance of the Father, we should expect the development of another double type, this time of two like gods" who in the course of time started to be differentiated by age (ibid.: 39).Waits gave a list of examples of such triple groups of gods in the Greek cults showing this gradual development.
Xors-Daž'bog and the supreme deity Perun form a triad which is reminiscent of the Thracian triad Dionysus, Ares and Artemis where the dual Dionysus-Ares may be paralleled with Xors-Daž'bog.The earlier, female dominated concept of the trinity could have been preserved in one of the most common motifs of the traditional 'tripartite' Slavonic embroidery showing the central figure of a woman and two horse riders (Slavonic analogue of Ashvins/Diouskuri?) with many details (e.g.rhombi with X-form crosses in place of the horses' genitals and between the woman's legs) having clear fertility connotations.
Such vision of the nature of the concept of trinity may also help to understand the Slovene mythological complex Kresnik-Vesnik/Kurent, forming a similar trinity with the mythical Deva/Vesna.
In the Baltic mythology the same idea is easily recognisable in the triple deity group: the sky-god Perkūnas, the young god of streams and nature Patrimpos and the chthonic deity Patulos described as an old bearded man (Ivanov and Toporov 1987;Balsys 2012).

'Sun fertility hero', Dioscuri and the horse
The intricate relations between the dual nature of Dionysus/Xors/Hṛṣu and the concept of 'Divine Twins' (Dioscuri) could be another promising area of research 78 .This fundamental concept extends beyond the Indo-European mythology (Harris 1913).The West Semitic (Palmyrene) twin-gods 'Arṣû and 'Azîzû appear particularly interesting because of the connection of 'Arṣû, strikingly similar phonetically to Xors, with the pre-Islamic North Arabian deity Ruḍâ "alias Orotalt, locally identified with the Nabataean Dushares, under the name Dionysos, worshipped as the child of god, borne by 'the young girl and virgin' alias Aphrodite -Urania" (Hvidberg-Hansen 2007: 95).
Finally, the well-known association of 'Divine Twins' with horses may be reviewed in the light of the proposed etymology Xors/Hṛṣu.The possible connection of Germanic hros/horse with the name of the legendary Anglo-Saxon Horsa and the Slavonic Xors was first proposed by Faminicyn (1884) but it was rejected out of hand at that time.This theory re-appeared in Chadwick (1946: 86) who dismissed the Iranian origin of Xors as "extremely improbable both in itself and also on philological grounds" (1946: 86, f. .hross, 'a horse'" was indeed one of her notorious "facile identifications" (Puhvel 1974: 81) for which she was rightly criticised by Tixomirov (1975), the parallels she drew between Xors, the phallic fertility god Freyr and the Norse Völsi blót ritual 79 could have been a remarkable insight.Of course, the Slavonic Xors is not a Germanic loan as Chadwick imagined and neither the Germanic horse/hross directly derives from Xors, yet these words may share the same common root 80 going back to the ancient fertility cult. 78For an in-depth analysis of possible relation of Xors-Daž'bog with the 'Dioscuri complex' see Beskov 2008.  7Sacrifice of the penis of a stallion that appears strikingly similar to the Roman 'October Horse' ritual as described in Vanggaard (1997: 89). 80The word 'horse' does not have a reliable etymology.(Boguslavskaja 1972: fig. 25. p. 142).

Conclusion
The traditional explanation of Xors as a late Iranian loan from the Persian xwaršēδ/ xoršid '(radiant) sun', conceived in the early stage of Historical Linguistics, has become an anachronism.It is not viable linguistically and is also a methodological dead-end because defining Xors as an abstract generic 'solar god' or the 'god of the solar disc' does not really explain anything.
Slavonic mythology and pre-Christian religious cults directly continue the Proto-Indo-European and Indo-European traditions so one should view the Slavonic deities not as detached 'exotic' entities or endless 'borrowings' from surrounding peoples but as local developments of the common ancient base-myths.The new etymology of Xors as a relic of the I-E *g̑hers-and the Proto-Indo-Aryan *hrs-/*hrṣ-, preserved to this day in toponyms in the Balkan and Circum-Pontic areas and also in numerous cognates in the principal I-E language branches, integrates Xors-Daž'bog into the mainstream of the pan-European and Eurasian mythology.It also helps to understand the intricate deep connection of the multitude of seemingly diverse Eurasian cults and myths which may all decent to the same fundamental Palaeolithic archetypes of 'Great Mother', 'Divine Marriage' and the eternal 'wheel' of birth and dying repeated at all levels from plants, animals, humans to the seasonal and cosmic cycles.Наряду с лингвистическими есть и культурно-исторические препятствия иранского происхождения теонима 'Хорс' .Несмотря на то, что образ солнца занимает важное место в славянском фольклоре, зачастую солнце представлялось как 'девица' .Однако главной проблемой в теории об иранском происхождении Хорса является вопрос о том, когда и при каких условиях славяне вообще могли заимство вать солнечный культ и название солнечного бога у иранцев.