Nekaj misli o konceptu prožnosti v geografiji naravnih nesreč // Some thoughts on the concept of resilience in geography of natural hazards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3986/GV86103Keywords:
geografija, geomorfologija, naravne nesreče, prožnost, ranljivost // geography, geomorphology, natural hazards, resilience, vulnerabilityAbstract
Koncept prožnosti se v zadnjem času uveljavlja kot pripomoček za razumevanje pokrajinske stvarnosti. Čeprav so ga uporabljali že v antiki, pojem v sodobnem pomenu izhaja iz fizike, kjer označuje lastnost materiala, da se ob motnji povrne v prvotno lego. V sedemdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja so ga uporabili v biologiji, potem pa je počasi prešel na druge vede. V geografiji se je uveljavil v zadnjem desetletju, zlasti na področju ekonomske geografije, v zadnjem času pa tudi na področju naravnih nesreč. V članku predstavljamo naravno- in družbenogeografske kazalnike s katerimi merimo prožnost pri naravnih nesrečah in iz njih izračunane indekse, ki so nam lahko v pomoč pri razumevanju geografske stvarnosti.
The concept of resilience has recently been gaining ground as a tool for understanding the landscape. Although it was already used in antiquity, the concept in its modern sense derives from physics, where it designates a characteristic of the material that is returns to its original position after a fault. The term was first used in biology in the seventies of the last century, and then it slowly moved to other sciences. It has been established in geography over the last decade, especially in the field of economic geography, and recently in the field of natural hazards. In this paper we present different natural- and social-geographic indicators to measure resilience of natural hazards and from the calculated indices that can help us better understand geographical environment.
References
Adger, N. 2000: Social and ecological resilience: Are they related. Progress in Human Geography 24-3. London. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465
Ainudin, S., Routray, J. K. 2012: Community resilience framework for an earthquake prone area in Baluchistan International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 2. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
Alexander, D. E. 2013: Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13. Katlenburg-Lindau. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
Birkmann, J. 2006: Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. Tokyo.
Brundsen, D. 2001: A critical assessment of the sensivity concept in geomorphology. Catena 42, 2-4. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00134-X
Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. A., von Winterfeldt, D. 2003: A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra 19-4. Oakland. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497
Building our nation's resilience to natural disasters. Australian Business Roundtable for disaster resilience. Barton, 2013.
Campbell, F. C. 2008: Elements of Metalurgy and Engineering Alloys. Materials Park.
Cannon, T. 2008: Reducing people's vulnerability to natural hazards. United Nations University Research Paper 34. Tokyo.
Chen, S. C., Ferng, J. W., Wang, Y. T., Wu, T. Y., Wang, J. J. 2008: Assessment of disaster resilience capacity of hillslope communities with high risk for geological hazards. Engineering Geology 98, 3-4. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.01.008
Cohen, O., Leykin, D., Lahad, M., Goldberg, A., Aharonson-Daniela, L. 2013: The conjoint community resiliency assessment measure as a baseline for profiling and predicting community resilience for emergencies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80-9. New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.009
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., Webb, J. 2008: A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change B: Environmental Hazards 18-4. New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
Ellis, F. 1998: Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. The Journal of Development Studies 35-1. London. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220389808422553
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., Walker, B. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31-5. Stockholm.
Fortune, J., Peters, G. 1995: Learning From Failure - The Systems Approach. Chichester.
Francis, R., Bekera, B. 2014: A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 12-1. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
Galderisi, A., Ferrara, F. F. 2013: Resilience. Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Dordrecht. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_292
Geršič, M., Repe, B., Blatnik, M., Brečko Grubar, V., Kovač, B., Pozvek, N., Seifert, A. 2014: Geografija in rastlinska sukcesija – izbrani primeri iz slovenskih pokrajin. Georitem 23. Ljubljana.
Google Earth Pro 4.3.7284.3916 (beta). Google. Santa Clara, 2010.
Hartwell, W. T. 2013: Community management of natural hazards. Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Dordrecht. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_72
Hewitt, K. 1997: Regions of Risk: Hazards, Vulnerability and Disasters. London.
Hewitt, K., Burton, I. 1971: The hazardousness of a place: A regional ecology of damaging events. Research Publication 6. Toronto.
Holling, C. S. 1973: Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4. Palo Alto. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
Holling, C. S. 2004: From complex regions to complex worlds. Ecology and Society 9-1. Wolfville.
Höppner, C., Buchecker, M., Bründl, M. 2010: Risk Communication and Natural Nazards. Medmrežje: http://caphaz-net.org/outcomes-results/CapHaz-Net_WP5_Risk-Communication2.pdf (15. 9. 2014).
Klein, R. J. T., Nicholls, R. J., Thomalla, F. 2003: Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Global Environmental Change B: Environmental Hazards 5, 1-2. New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2004.02.001
Komac, B. 2009: Družbenogeografski spomin in naravnogeografski spomin na naravne nesreče. Acta geographica Slovenica 49-1. Ljubljana. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3986/AGS49107
Komac, B., Zorn, M., Kušar, D. 2012: New possibilities for assessing the damage caused by natural disasters in Slovenia: the case of the Real Estate Record. Geografski vestnik 84-1. Ljubljana.
Kozina, J. 2010: Transport accessibility to regional centres in Slovenia. Acta geographica Slovenica 50-2. Ljubljana. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3986/AGS50203
Kulig, J., Hanson, L. 1996: Discussion and expansion of the concept of resiliency, Summary of a think tank.
Lu, P., Stead, D. 2013: Understanding the notion of resilience in spatial planning: A case study of Rotterdam, the Nederlands. Cities 35. Guildford. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
Lunino, F. 2005: Sequence of instability processes triggered by heavy rainfall in the Northern Italy. Geomorphology 66-1. New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.09.010
Major, J. J. 2003: Extreme events and geomorphic resilience insight from response to the cataclysmic 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption. American Geophysical Union Abstract H42J06. Vancouver.
Manyena, S. B. 2006: The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters 30-4. Oxford. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00331.x
Martin, R. 2012: Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography 12-1. Oxford. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr019
Mavhura, E., Manyena, S. B., Collins, A. E., Manatsa, D. 2013: Indigenous knowledge, coping strategies and resilience to floods in Muzarabani, Zimbabwe. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 5. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.07.001
Mikoš, M., Fazarinc, R., Ribičič, M. 2006: Sediment production and delivery from recent large landslides and earthquakeinduced rock falls in the Upper Soča River Valley, Slovenia. Engineering geology 86, 2-3. Oxford. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.02.015
Natek, K. 2002: Ogroženost zaradi naravnih procesov kot strukturni element slovenskih pokrajin. Dela 18. Ljubljana. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4312/1350
Orencio, P. M., Fujii, M. 2013: A localized disaster resilience index to assess coastal communities based on an analytic hierarchy process (AHP). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 3. Amsterdam. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.11.006
Paton, D., Johnston, D. M. 2006: Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Approach. Springfield.
Perrow, C. 1999: Normal Accidents: Living With Highrisk Technologies. Princeton.
Petek, F., Gabrovec, M. 2002: A methodology for assessing the change in land use in Slovenia from the viewpoint of sustainable development. Land Use/Land Cover Changes in the Period of Globalization. Praga.
Price-Robertson, R., Knight, K. 2012: Natural disasters and community resilience. Child Family Community Australia Paper 3. Melbourne.
Raco, M., Street, E. 2012: Resilience planning, economic change and the politics of postrecession development in London and Hong Kong. Urban Studies 49-5. Abingdon. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0042098011415716
Rose, A., Krausmann, E. 2013: An economic framework for the development of a resilience index for business recovery. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 5. Amsterdam. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.08.003
Rouillard, J. J., Reeves, A. D., Heal, K. V., Ball, T. 2014: The role of public participation in encouraging changes in rural landuse to reduce flood risk. Land Use Policy 38. New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.011
Schelfaut, K., Pannemans, B., van der Craats, I., Krywkow, J., Mysiak, J., Cools, J. 2011: Bringing flood resilience into practice: the FREEMAN project. Environmental Science and Policy 14-7. Exeter. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.009
Schouten, M. A. H., van der Heide, C. M., Heijman W. J. M., Opdam, P. F. M. 2012: A resilience based policy evaluation framework: Application to European rural development policies. Ecological Economics 81. New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.004
Tobin, G. 1999: Sustainability and community resilience: The holy grail of hazard planning? Global Environmental Change B: Environmental Hazards 1-1. New York. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1464-2867(99)00002-9
Turconi, L., Nigrelli, G., Conte, R. 2014: Historical datum as a abasis for new GIS application to support civil protection services in NW Italy. Computers and Geosciences 66. Oxford. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.12.008
Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., Norberg, J., Peterson G. D., Pritchard, R. 2002: Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Ecology and Society 6-1. Wolfville.
Weichselgartner, J., Kelman, I. 2014: Geographies of resilience - challenges and opportunities of a descriptive concept. Progress in Human Geography. London. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309132513518834
Woodroffe, C. D. 2006: The Natural Resilience of Coastal Systems: Primary Concepts. Woolongong.
Zehetmair, S. 2012: Societal aspects of vulnerability to natural hazards. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 70-4. Heidelberg.
Zhou, H., Wang, J., Wan, J., Jia, H. 2010: Resilience to natural hazards: A geographic perspective. Natural Hazards 53-1. Dordrecht. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
Zorn, M., Komac, B. 2009: Nekateri učinki bojevanja na naravno pokrajino. Geografski vestnik 81-2. Ljubljana.
Zorn, M., Komac, B. 2011: Škoda zaradi naravnih nesreč v Sloveniji in svetu med letoma 1995 in 2010. Acta geographica Slovenica 51-1. Ljubljana. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3986/AGS51101
Zorn, M., Komac, B., Kumelj, Š. 2012: Mass movement susceptibility maps in Slovenia: The current state. Geografski vestnik 84-1. Ljubljana.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All moral rights are retained by the author for copyright work submitted for publication in Geografskivestnik. The author transfers all material rights to reproduction and distribution in Slovenia and in other countries to the publisher free of charge, without time limit, for all cases, for unlimited numbers of copies, and for all analog and digital media without exception. If the article is not in line with the instructions for publication, the author shall permit the publisher to adapt the article accordingly. The publisher shall ensure that, given sufficient funds for printing, all positively reviewed articles shall be published in Geografski vestnik, generally in the sequence in which they are received and in line with the balanced distribution of articles by section. Commissioned articles may be published at any time regardless of the date they are received.No authorship fee is paid for articles in Geografski vestnik. Authors are entitled to one free copy of the publication.
Za avtorsko delo, poslano za objavo v Geografski vestnik, vse moralne avtorske pravice pripadajo avtorju, materialne avtorske pravice reproduciranja in distribuiranja v Republiki Sloveniji in v drugih državah pa avtor brezplačno, enkrat za vselej, za vse primere, za neomejene naklade in za vse analogne in digitalne medije neizključno prenese na izdajateljico. Če avtorsko delo ni v skladu z navodili za objavo, avtor dovoljuje izdajateljici, da avtorsko delo po svoji presoji ustrezno prilagodi. Izdajateljica poskrbi, da se vsi prispevki s pozitivno recenzijo, če so zagotovljena sredstva za tisk, objavijo v Geografskem vestniku, praviloma v skladu z vrstnim redom prispetja prispevkov in v skladu z enakomerno razporeditvijo prispevkov po rubrikah. Naročeni prispevki se lahko objavijo ne gledena datum prispetja. Članki v reviji Geografski vestnik niso honorirani. Avtorju pripada 1 brezplačen izvod publikacije.
